Build Threads Building a motor? Post the progress here.

Laur3ns going AbsurdFlow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-2013, 11:09 AM
  #61  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
Nickle anti-seize.
I'm using that (copper based) and grease on all the flanges, so it's not a friction issue.
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 06-14-2013, 02:37 PM
  #62  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

lightly tighten the vband, hit the flange or the clamp with a hammer and tighten again.


Vbands without gaskets will always leak a little bit, but there shouldnt be very much if the flange was decked after welding and clamped while welding.
shlammed is offline  
Old 06-17-2013, 03:15 PM
  #63  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Today, the Wilwood 11.75" kit came in. The one with the radial mount calipers and they are HUGE. There is so much more beef in these compared to the lug mount DLs, they should be awesome. I mainly went for the radials because they offer more clearance/wheel choice.

Also, I'm wrapping the oil/water lines and wastegate signal lines with one million degrees heat wrap. I'm using a Pierburg boost solenoid valve, used by many OEMs and Subaru/ProDrive, et al.

Originally Posted by shlammed
lightly tighten the vband, hit the flange or the clamp with a hammer and tighten again.
Thanks, will try.
Attached Thumbnails Laur3ns going AbsurdFlow-wp_20130616_011.jpg   Laur3ns going AbsurdFlow-wilwood-radial.jpg  
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 06-18-2013, 05:15 PM
  #64  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

New hubs mounted in the rear, as well as the ASTs.

Also, new front LCAs came in. need to transfer the ES bushes from the current LCAs. Glad the new ones came with no bushings installed.
Attached Thumbnails Laur3ns going AbsurdFlow-wp_20130618_011.jpg   Laur3ns going AbsurdFlow-wp_20130618_013.jpg   Laur3ns going AbsurdFlow-wp_20130618_014.jpg  
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 06-23-2013, 04:33 PM
  #65  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Dyno time tomorrow!

ASTs are mounted, base ride height set. New front LCAs and tie rods.Initially the front shocks were very low and it looked like a CR.net car with 5+* degrees of static camber. My NB subframe has slight 'adjustments' for more camber.

Goals for tomorrow are:
- Leak down test
- Rewrite ECU map. Main maps: RPM vs Throttle% and secondary maps: RPM vs MAP. Currently the compensation map is based just on MAP.
- Retune fuel (probably lean compared to previous setup)
- Retune spark, aiming for 250rwhp
- Tune EBC for 0.8, 1.0 and 1.2bar boost (11.5, 14.5 and 17.5psi)
- Tune tip-in/out
- Tune idle
Attached Thumbnails Laur3ns going AbsurdFlow-wp_20130623_006.jpg  
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 06-23-2013, 04:53 PM
  #66  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Mobius's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,468
Total Cats: 365
Default

Awesomeness inbound. Looking great.
Mobius is offline  
Old 06-23-2013, 05:55 PM
  #67  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Oscar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bolton, UK
Posts: 3,022
Total Cats: 120
Default

Add tune hot start to the list. Cranking for minutes at a time gets old real fast every time you stall it
Oscar is offline  
Old 06-23-2013, 09:41 PM
  #68  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Originally Posted by Oscar
Add tune hot start to the list. Cranking for minutes at a time gets old real fast every time you stall it
And hot post start enrichment. Having the car turn over and start great cold but require you to keep on the gas pedal a touch for the next 2 minutes after a hot start also sucks.
Leafy is offline  
Old 06-24-2013, 09:58 AM
  #69  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Default

Wow, this build has picked up a lot of momentum lately. When is the start of your next season?
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Old 06-24-2013, 10:09 AM
  #70  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by Laur3ns
This scares me:

GT2860RS Spin - YouTube
I think that's normal. Also, remember this bearing has a metal cage so it's going to supposedly make more noise. Maybe call Owens and see what they say.
Originally Posted by Laur3ns
Oil drain has oil, so I am probably overreacting. I feel better about it than I did last night.
Also, how tight are those v-bands supposed to be? I think I still have a slight exhaust leak somewhere.

I've already killed one on the test pipe Luckily I had a spare. Hand tools only.
Take the flanges apart and check them for soot/leaks. The metal will burn away if you have a leak. The wastegate will be a huge bitch to get seated and you will need to use a deadblow. Connect the dump-tube and then the WG to the manifold. The Turbo should be pretty easy to line-up.
hustler is offline  
Old 06-28-2013, 11:39 AM
  #71  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Dyno results are in, and I'm happy.
at 0.8bar (11psi) I'm making what my GT2560R was doing at 1.1bar (16psi), which is 255rwhp.

This run is at 1.0bar (14.5psi) and I'm making 228lbft wheel torque and 277rwhp.

The 1.2-1.3bar maps show that I make more torque, but not much more hp, so I probably run into TB/intake limits there.
Attached Thumbnails Laur3ns going AbsurdFlow-mx99t-absflow-1.0bar.jpg  
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 06-28-2013, 12:01 PM
  #72  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

nice looking curve, just as expected.
Braineack is offline  
Old 06-28-2013, 12:46 PM
  #73  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Will post comparison to 2560 later.
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 06-28-2013, 12:55 PM
  #74  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by Laur3ns
Dyno time tomorrow!

ASTs are mounted, base ride height set. New front LCAs and tie rods.Initially the front shocks were very low and it looked like a CR.net car with 5+* degrees of static camber. My NB subframe has slight 'adjustments' for more camber.

Goals for tomorrow are:
- Leak down test
- Rewrite ECU map. Main maps: RPM vs Throttle% and secondary maps: RPM vs MAP. Currently the compensation map is based just on MAP.
- Retune fuel (probably lean compared to previous setup)
- Retune spark, aiming for 250rwhp
- Tune EBC for 0.8, 1.0 and 1.2bar boost (11.5, 14.5 and 17.5psi)
- Tune tip-in/out
- Tune idle
The attached picture looks SO SICK
Originally Posted by Laur3ns
Will post comparison to 2560 later.
The curve looks very good, 'grats.

Very interested in overlay of the 2 turbos
18psi is offline  
Old 06-28-2013, 02:07 PM
  #75  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

I love that I have only 12-14% driveline loss. That is on a 4WD dyno, so F+R. That is: line bored crank, twin clutch, rebuild Quaife box, rebuild Torsen, rebuild axles, bearings and hubs.
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 06-28-2013, 02:17 PM
  #76  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

how did they measure drivetrain loss, did they pull the motor and then engine dyno it alone before/after the chassis dyno then do some basic math?
Braineack is offline  
Old 06-28-2013, 02:26 PM
  #77  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Haven't found the best data files for GT2560R@1.1bar (16psi) vs GT2860RS@0.8bar (11.5psi), but:
- at 3000rpm the make the same boost and torque
- from >3100rpm the 28 takes off in terms of torque.

So, the 94BP w/2560 on a BEGI log spools slightly worse than a 99BP w/GT2860RS on AbsurdFlow... so you can have your cake and eat it too!

The funny part is that the 28 at 11psi is sleeping and only comes alive at 15psi+
Attached Thumbnails Laur3ns going AbsurdFlow-mx99t-gt2560%401.1-vs-gt2860rs%400.8.jpg  
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 06-28-2013, 02:28 PM
  #78  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Here's 0.8bar/11.5psi, 1.0bar/14.5psi, 1.2bar/17.5psi and 1.3bar/19psi.
You can see at 1.2bar+ I'm making more torque, but not more hp. Must be the throttle body/intake.
Attached Thumbnails Laur3ns going AbsurdFlow-mx99t-absflow-0.8bar.jpg   Laur3ns going AbsurdFlow-mx99t-absflow-1.0bar.jpg   Laur3ns going AbsurdFlow-mx99t-absflow-1.2bar.jpg   Laur3ns going AbsurdFlow-mx99t-absflow-1.3bar.jpg  
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 06-28-2013, 02:38 PM
  #79  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
how did they measure drivetrain loss, did they pull the motor and then engine dyno it alone before/after the chassis dyno then do some basic math?
Neither. The first run is that they run the car up to redline (but not under power, just to get up to the rpm) and let it coast till idle. The dyno calculates loss (knowing it's own loss) and uses it in subsequent runs.

Produces this graph:
Attached Thumbnails Laur3ns going AbsurdFlow-driveline-loss-graph.jpg  
Laur3ns is offline  
Old 06-28-2013, 02:42 PM
  #80  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
Laur3ns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Enschede, NL
Posts: 2,053
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Laur3ns
Must be the throttle body/intake.
Here is 1.0 vs 1.3:
Attached Thumbnails Laur3ns going AbsurdFlow-mx99t-absflow-1.0bar-vs-1.3bar.jpg  
Laur3ns is offline  


Quick Reply: Laur3ns going AbsurdFlow



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 PM.