Notices
Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

No more Twinkies for you!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 12:10 PM
  #1  
NA6C-Guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 44
From: Birmingham Alabama
Default No more Twinkies for you!

Goddamn it union workers, you've gone and done it now. **** where you sleep why don't you. You forced yourself and your fellow 18,500 workers out of a job and forced an American icon to be lost forever. Twinkies, Ho-Ho's, Ding Dongs, Sno *****, all gone!!! Hostess made a mean coffee cake as well. ******* greedy bastards, they probably already made twice what they were worth. Though honestly I have no idea what the union dispute was over.

Oh, and Wonder bread is another lost icon.
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 12:12 PM
  #2  
ies's Avatar
ies
Newb
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 23
Total Cats: -2
Default

Oh nose!
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 12:15 PM
  #3  
NA6C-Guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 44
From: Birmingham Alabama
Default

Not that I particularly liked any of their snack cakes more than any other over sweetened, over processed snack cake, but still. It's pretty ******* iconic, the products they made.
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 12:18 PM
  #4  
18psi's Avatar
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,482
Default

oh noes, how will we ever go into a sugar coma again?
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 12:20 PM
  #5  
NA6C-Guy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,930
Total Cats: 44
From: Birmingham Alabama
Default

Actually, upon further reading, seems that the company is only being liquidated. I'm sure someone will buy it and keep it alive, with non union workers this time...

I still find it amazing that a company of this size, in this day and age could just be gone like that. You would seem with all of the government support all of these useless companies get, they could have had some sort of safety net...? I don't really know or care, just found the news sort of interesting. 18,500 more employees to further saturate the market and make jobs that much harder for some people to find.
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 12:26 PM
  #6  
palmtree's Avatar
Junior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 275
Total Cats: 5
From: College Station, TX
Default


Well when the zombie apocalypse comes, Tallahassee will really never get his beloved Twinkies...
Attached Thumbnails No more Twinkies for you!-no-more-twinkies-tallahassee-sad-_685189b6663c9463bee8be85e646a3f1.jpg  
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 12:45 PM
  #7  
ies's Avatar
ies
Newb
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 23
Total Cats: -2
Default

Won't somebody please think of the children?
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 12:50 PM
  #8  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Eh, can't really blame them. How long do you think Hostess was going to keep running anyway? Take a pay cut now so they can just lay you off next year when they file for bankruptcy again?

Besides, our free-trade agreements were far more damaging to the confectionery industry than unions could ever be.
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 01:18 PM
  #9  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
Besides, our free-trade agreements were far more damaging to the confectionery industry than unions could ever be.
You think Chinese labor killed the Twinkie?

Open your eyes, man. Once the US accepted the rule of a central bank and abandoned the gold standard in the early 20th century, the demise of our snack foods industry was inevitable. I'm amazed they managed to hold on this long with nothing but worthless fiat money to work with. The soft drink industry isn't far behind.
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 01:25 PM
  #10  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

No, it has more to do with the sugar tariffs that tripled the price of sugar overnight.

I know because my family owns a candy factory in Chicago, and have since moved all but the sugar-free production over to China. Not because of labor costs (though obviously that helps).

Now the price of sugar is going up in China, so they are looking elsewhere now, I forget where.
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 01:33 PM
  #11  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

And what do you think CAUSED the price of sugar to increase?

The Federal Reserve bank.


How can you people not see that EVERYTHING which goes wrong is the fault of the Federal Reserve?

Stub your toe? Blame Bernacke.

Neighbor's dog shitting in your lawn? Blame Bernacke.

Car won't idle on right on cold mornings? Blame Bernacke.

Got Herpes? Blame Hustler. Then blame Bernacke.
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 01:39 PM
  #12  
bbundy's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

I have serious doubts that workers desiring a living wage and reasonable benefits is the reason for hostess to declare bankruptcy, makes a nice scapegoat however.
I hope they will be replaced with smaller companies making tasty treats with locally grown and less processed ingredients.
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 01:40 PM
  #13  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Ah, I got you.

Well **** Ben Bernake for forcing us to buy US sugar (which by the way the US can't actually meet it's own demands for sugar). Also **** him for pushing Ethanol as an alternative fuel despite its utter uselessness for everything besides high-boost cars, which also raised the price of corn syrup so we couldn't even just use more corn syrup rather than sugar.
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 01:44 PM
  #14  
bbundy's Avatar
Elite Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,502
Total Cats: 146
From: Anacortes, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
And what do you think CAUSED the price of sugar to increase?

The Federal Reserve bank.


How can you people not see that EVERYTHING which goes wrong is the fault of the Federal Reserve?

Stub your toe? Blame Bernacke.

Neighbor's dog shitting in your lawn? Blame Bernacke.

Car won't idle on right on cold mornings? Blame Bernacke.

Got Herpes? Blame Hustler. Then blame Bernacke.
I suspect you can blame the corn lobby for sugar tariffs. I’m sure they are also working with Monsanto to make GMO high fructose corn syrup as addictive as Tobacco. Profit at all costs.
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 01:45 PM
  #15  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

The Federal Reserve secretly controls the corn industry.


On a more serious note however:


How the hell do you go bankrupt selling sugary snacks to fat people with poor impulse control?

I mean, that's almost a joke. Like the common expressions "It's as easy as selling cold beer to people in hell" or "It's like calling the inbound shipping department at a hobby and craft store in Reno."


I'm going to start using that expression. "Techsalvager is such a retard, he couldn't figure out how to make money selling Twinkies to fat people."
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 01:46 PM
  #16  
Splitime's Avatar
Miotta FTW!
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,290
Total Cats: 31
From: Chicagoland, IL
Default

Originally Posted by thenuge26
No, it has more to do with the sugar tariffs that tripled the price of sugar overnight.

I know because my family owns a candy factory in Chicago, and have since moved all but the sugar-free production over to China. Not because of labor costs (though obviously that helps).

Now the price of sugar is going up in China, so they are looking elsewhere now, I forget where.
What? Where... I want to visit and reap some free MT candy.
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 02:11 PM
  #17  
dstn2bdoa's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 988
Total Cats: 8
From: Big Bear Ca
Default

Unions didn't kill that company, human nature and greed killed it.

Years ago land owners and large business owners abused their power and greedily abused their employees. Therefore unions were born.

Unions gained power and greedily abused their employers.

As long as humans are involved in this process their inherent greed will cause it to succeed and then subsequently fail.
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 02:31 PM
  #18  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez

How the hell do you go bankrupt selling sugary snacks to fat people with poor impulse control?

Triple the price of sugar overnight, and then have US producers fail to meet demand anyway! It's not that hard. Oh yeah also obviously the price of corn syrup has gone through the roof also.
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 02:57 PM
  #19  
Joe Perez's Avatar
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 34,381
Total Cats: 7,504
From: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Default

I understand the supply-side constraints.

What I don't understand is why Hostess cannot simply pass those costs along to the consumer. It's not like their target demo is going to stop buying Twinkies just because the price went up by 20 cents.

Snack-food production is not a regulated market. There are no price controls. Manufacturers may elevate prices in response to increased production cost, and then observe the resultant shift in demand. This is how capatalism works. (Listen to me, I sound like friggin' Jason...)
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 04:29 PM
  #20  
thenuge26's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
From: Indianapolis
Default

Haha, sorry. Anything having to do with corn or sugar prices always rustles my jimmies.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:58 AM.