Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-05-2018, 03:53 PM
  #12801  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,026
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by bahurd
The SC in it's 1898 United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 disagreed.
The Supreme Court often disagrees, interprets the constitution in new ways, etc. That's kind of the whole reason for having the Supreme Court in the first place.

That said, many people (myself included) often speculate as to the intent of the people who authored the Constitution and its amendments, wish for some kind of context in which to interpret them, etc. This happens to be one of those rare cases in which the person who actually authored a constitutional amendment also penned a very concise essay which explains specifically how it was intended to be read. The author of the 14th amendment made it clear that it does not apply to people who are already citizens of another country.



Originally Posted by bahurd
You mean immigration in general? Or the hordes of babies being born by those illegals?
I assume that he means the erosion of the foundations of the republic, by chipping away at the validity of the constitution.

Eg: claiming that the 1st (or 2nd, or 14th, or whatever) amendment is "outdated" or "doesn't really apply to this situation."

It's not about immigration, it's about the sanctity of the constitution itself.

Joe Perez is online now  
Old 11-05-2018, 04:39 PM
  #12802  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
bahurd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,381
Total Cats: 314
Default

Pretty good article on the 14th, how/why it came to be. Court cases that evolved from it: Analyzing Birthright Citizenship as Declared (Not Established) by the Fourteenth Amendment. Too bad the amendment authors didn't specifically exclude those here illegally or born to those here illegally.

Last edited by bahurd; 11-05-2018 at 06:13 PM.
bahurd is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 08:35 AM
  #12803  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
buffon01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,609
Total Cats: 13
Default

Originally Posted by Joe Perez
The Supreme Court often disagrees, interprets the constitution in new ways, etc. That's kind of the whole reason for having the Supreme Court in the first place.

That said, many people (myself included) often speculate as to the intent of the people who authored the Constitution and its amendments, wish for some kind of context in which to interpret them, etc. This happens to be one of those rare cases in which the person who actually authored a constitutional amendment also penned a very concise essay which explains specifically how it was intended to be read. The author of the 14th amendment made it clear that it does not apply to people who are already citizens of another country.
What about citizens of other countries with legal entry, are they then subject to jurisdiction?
buffon01 is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 08:39 AM
  #12804  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
buffon01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,609
Total Cats: 13
Default

Originally Posted by bahurd
You mean immigration in general? Or the hordes of babies being born by those illegals? Interesting statistics: White Students are Now the Minority in U.S. Public Schools
With the population of LA being higher than a few states put together, isn't this study a bit skewed?
buffon01 is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 09:03 AM
  #12805  
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
 
Joe Perez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,026
Total Cats: 6,592
Default

Originally Posted by buffon01
What about citizens of other countries with legal entry, are they then subject to jurisdiction?
Not in the sense in which "subject" means "one who lives in the territory of, enjoys the protection of, and owes allegiance to a sovereign power or state" (source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/subject)

"Allegiance to a sovereign power or state" is the key article here. A citizen of the UK, residing in the US on a work visa or holding a Legal Permanent Resident card, is still considered to be a subject of, and owing allegiance to, the British Crown. As such, they do not have the same rights, within the US, as a US citizen. If they wish to become a US citizen, they are required to renounce their allegiance to any foreign nation. (Source: Code of Federal Regulations Title 8, Chapter V, Subchapter C, §1337.1.)

Aliens residing in the US (as with US citizens residing in a foreign country) are required to obey the laws of the area in which they reside. They are not, however, granted all of the rights and privileges which are afforded to a citizen. To name a few examples, citizens are (with a few exceptions, such as disenfranchisement) permitted to vote, eligible to run for public office, entitled to receive social services, able to hold a passport from the country of residence, entitled to access the consulate offices of that country when traveling abroad, eligible for public-sector employment, and immune from deportation. These are not extended to non-citizens, regardless of the legality of their residency.



EDIT: I just realized that the Oath of the Presidency, from Battlestar Galactica, contains a phrase which is lifted directly from the US Oath of Allegiance which is the final step in the process of obtaining US Citizenship. To wit: "...without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion..."

So that's kind of cool in a nerdy way.
Joe Perez is online now  
Old 11-06-2018, 09:08 AM
  #12806  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

#neverforget

Braineack is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 09:12 AM
  #12807  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Braineack is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 09:17 AM
  #12808  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default












Braineack is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 09:22 AM
  #12809  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

how to socialist, 2018:

“In a modern, moral and wealthy society, no person should be too poor to live,” Ocasio-Cortez said when asked to define her Democratic Socialism. “We should treat healthcare, housing, and education as rights,” she said, adding, “I believe we should guarantee a basic level of human dignity in America.”

Jorge Ramos then asked specifically about several of her proposals. “Medicare for all, is it too expensive?” Ramos asked.

“No, people often say, like, how are you going to pay for it and I find the question so puzzling because ‘How do you pay for something that’s more affordable? How do you pay for cheaper rent?’ You just pay for it. We’re paying more now.”
https://hotair.com/archives/2018/11/...sals-puzzling/

she really is that dumb...
Braineack is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 09:28 AM
  #12810  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

fake news from FL:

https://deadline.com/2018/11/msnbc-g...MN2jjsqe98jqq4



this aired monday night.
Braineack is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 12:41 PM
  #12811  
Junior Member
 
BGordon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 196
Total Cats: 24
Default

It isn't the biggest or most flashy subject but I am sure hoping the Marijuana legalizing measures pass in the various states that have it on the ballot.
6 more years before I retire and have to decide which of the legal states to move to.
Sure want more choices.
Doubt Oklahoma will make it legal by the because we are such a backwards state.
BGordon is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 12:45 PM
  #12812  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

i got to vote if we take out another big *** loan to pay for another stupid *** project.
















Braineack is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 12:53 PM
  #12813  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Erat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Posts: 5,677
Total Cats: 800
Default

It will be legalized here in Michigan. Bet.
Erat is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 01:09 PM
  #12814  
Elite Member
 
z31maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
Default

Originally Posted by BGordon
It isn't the biggest or most flashy subject but I am sure hoping the Marijuana legalizing measures pass in the various states that have it on the ballot.
6 more years before I retire and have to decide which of the legal states to move to.
Sure want more choices.
Doubt Oklahoma will make it legal by the because we are such a backwards state.
Well, yeah. The front running R for governor, doesn't even vote himself and made his nut on very questionable lender practices.

I was surprised we even got medical to pass. Speaking of, I need to find a doctor and get my card.

And recreational was pulled from the ballot thanks to the group forging signatures to try to get it on.
z31maniac is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 02:46 PM
  #12815  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
triple88a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 10,454
Total Cats: 1,799
Default

Everyone keeps talking about democrats but I've yet to see my taxes lowered after trump took office.. Unfortunately I'm not the top 1% sooooo.
triple88a is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 02:47 PM
  #12816  
Junior Member
 
BGordon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 196
Total Cats: 24
Default

I feel for you Maniac.
My guess is that Oklahoma will be in the bottom half to actually legalize it, which is why I am making preparations to move to another state after retirement.
Rather than actually voting for either of the garbage candidates for guv I just took the easy way out and voted straight party on the ballot.
I also vote to get rid of every judge even though they all get re-elected.

If it does become legal before I retire it will be simple remain living here.
A guy has to be prepared for the worst even as I am hoping for the best.
Guarantee I am not moving way North to any of the states voting on it this time.
BGordon is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 02:50 PM
  #12817  
Junior Member
 
BGordon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 196
Total Cats: 24
Default

Have you done your 2018 taxes yet?
In theory you should be getting the benefit this year but for most it doesn't show up till we file.
I can't do mine till early next year.
Revisit the subject about a month after submitting yours and see if you still have the same attitude.
BGordon is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 05:48 PM
  #12818  
Elite Member
 
z31maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 3,693
Total Cats: 222
Default

Originally Posted by triple88a
Everyone keeps talking about democrats but I've yet to see my taxes lowered after trump took office.. Unfortunately I'm not the top 1% sooooo.
I'm not in the top 1%, or even close. I'm very solidly middle class in a relatively cheap state to live in.

The tax cut basically offset the cost of adding my girlfriend to my health insurance for the year, roughly $140/month IIRC.
z31maniac is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 05:59 PM
  #12819  
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,177
Total Cats: 1,681
Default

I voted straight ticket Lawrence Snead, except for one choice. I may have to drop running MKTurbo to become the City of Goose Creek's Coroner. We had a vote for soil and water district commissioner and I voted Green for that one. Mostly because I voted for Nader.
shuiend is offline  
Old 11-06-2018, 06:31 PM
  #12820  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Erat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Detroit (the part with no rules or laws)
Posts: 5,677
Total Cats: 800
Default

Made sure to vote for the black republican here.


In all honestly, i did vote for John James.
Erat is offline  


Quick Reply: The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:34 PM.