Current Events, News, Politics Keep the politics here.

The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2012, 12:47 PM
  #1481  
Newb
 
Alameda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 33
Total Cats: -1
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
yeah the dude is nuts. I dont even know why he ran for pres. or how he's come so far.
The GOP candidates this election year remind me of the democrats in '04. There isn't really anybody to get excited about. If things stay the way they are, Obama shouldn't have a problem getting reelected, for better or for worse.
Alameda is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 12:51 PM
  #1482  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

Originally Posted by Alameda
The GOP candidates this election year remind me of the democrats in '04. There isn't really anybody to get excited about. If things stay the way they are, Obama shouldn't have a problem getting reelected, for better or for worse.
Paul's the only one worth a ----, and well, we know how well he's doing.
blaen99 is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 12:55 PM
  #1483  
Newb
 
Alameda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 33
Total Cats: -1
Default

Originally Posted by blaen99
Paul's the only one worth a ----, and well, we know how well he's doing.
Paul is the only candidate who stands up for things that should never be in question. (e.g. civil liberties). While I don't agree with him totally on things like the federal reserve, I really love that he has a budget that will actually CUT the deficit. All the other candidates want to do a lot of bush era fiscal policy, i.e. cut revenues and increase spending.

TLR Ron Paul has my vote, he get's the fundamentals right.
Alameda is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 01:00 PM
  #1484  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

And what do you know. As a result, the GOP and sponsors do their best to sink Paul.

Blah.
blaen99 is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 01:56 PM
  #1485  
Newb
 
crimson_yachiru's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sarasota
Posts: 41
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by blaen99
Paul's the only one worth a ----, and well, we know how well he's doing.
Not sure if someone has already posted this:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-215_162-...s-the-unbound/

For those of you who haven't watched the West Wing, I'll tell you a little story: The democrats went to the convention without a nominee, and with three people with large numbers of delegates. After the first fairly symbolic vote, the delegates became unbound and free to vote for whomever they wished. So the guy who was chosen did not have the most delegates.

Here's to hoping for a brokered convention, because RP is the only candidate paying attention to the fact that votes in primaries don't win you the nomination. The delegates win the nomination.
crimson_yachiru is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 02:10 PM
  #1486  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

So long as it's not Santorum or Gingrich, I'm fine with whoever becomes president.

Those two are....

Romney's to the left of Obama, Paul's actually pro-civil liberties (And is the best of all of our options), and Obama isn't crazy. Gingrich and Santorum? Full on insanity. As in if they become president, we're gonna be looking longingly at the Bush years for the wars we'll get into.

Goddamn, it's sad how much the bar has been lowered. "Which president won't get us into a massive amount of wars" as a criteria? wtf?
blaen99 is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 02:28 PM
  #1487  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
jared8783's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 4
Default

i have no reason to think that any of the potential candidates will do anything different from one another other that Ron Paul.

what i mean is that a sell out is a sell out. if a sell out is in office his actions are according to the highest bidder
jared8783 is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 02:40 PM
  #1488  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
gearhead_318's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,966
Total Cats: 21
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
yeah the dude is nuts. I dont even know why he ran for pres. or how he's come so far.
I'm glad we can agree on something. I don't know who is worse, Santorum, Palin or Trump.
gearhead_318 is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 06:01 PM
  #1489  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
gearhead_318's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,966
Total Cats: 21
Default

More Santorum:

"I don't believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute," Santorum, a devout Catholic, said in an interview from Michigan on ABC's "This Week."
http://news.yahoo.com/santorum-says-...164307440.html
gearhead_318 is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 07:53 PM
  #1490  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

You forgot the worst part, Gearhead.

adding that he was sickened by John F. Kennedy's assurances to Baptist ministers 52 years ago that he would not impose his Catholic faith on them.
Let me reiterate. Santorum is sickened that Kennedy said he would not impose his Catholic faith on Baptists.

(Edit) You know what? I take it back. I hope Santorum becomes President now. It will take that much to get America to wake the ---- up.
blaen99 is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 09:01 PM
  #1491  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
gearhead_318's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,966
Total Cats: 21
Default

Santorum as president would send us into the dark ages, I can't believe that somebody would say something like that. I wonder how much the Catholic Church has/will donate to his campaign.

That being said I don't think he'll be president. I think don't think moderates will vote for him, and therefor he will not get the nomination. I think Romney is the safe bet for GOP nominee.
gearhead_318 is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 09:09 PM
  #1492  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

But that's the thing, Gearhead. At this point, I'm starting to think it'll take dark ages to get people to wake the hell up.
blaen99 is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 10:15 PM
  #1493  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/th...ative-rhetoric

Jon Stewart successfully made me lol in this.
blaen99 is offline  
Old 02-26-2012, 10:58 PM
  #1494  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-epi...bruce-bartlett

I'm shocked. People who are closely tied to Ronald Reagan are calling the current Republicans insane?
blaen99 is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 11:35 AM
  #1495  
Boost Czar
Thread Starter
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

peace in the middle east:


Last edited by Braineack; 10-08-2019 at 09:48 AM.
Braineack is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 11:39 AM
  #1496  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
mgeoffriau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
Default

Win their hearts and minds? Mission accomplished!
mgeoffriau is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 03:43 PM
  #1497  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Scrappy Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 2,799
Total Cats: 179
Question

Originally Posted by blaen99
You forgot the worst part, Gearhead.

Let me reiterate. Santorum is sickened that Kennedy said he would not impose his Catholic faith on Baptists.
I tried a quick search but I can't find a primary source quote for that (i.e. the exact words in which he says he is "sickened"). The closest I could find was this:

The New York Times
“What kind of country do we live in that says only people of nonfaith can come into the public square and make their case?” Mr. Santorum said on the ABC News program “This Week.”

“That makes me throw up,” he said, adding later, “I don’t believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute.”
Scrappy Jack is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 03:44 PM
  #1498  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

Originally Posted by Scrappy Jack
I tried a quick search but I can't find a primary source quote for that (i.e. the exact words in which he says he is "sickened"). The closest I could find was this:
So, saying he'd throw up isn't close enough to sickened for your taste mang?
blaen99 is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 04:50 PM
  #1499  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
blaen99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,611
Total Cats: 25
Default

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/25/op...pagewanted=all

Girding my loins for massive flamewar on this.
blaen99 is offline  
Old 02-27-2012, 05:02 PM
  #1500  
Elite Member
iTrader: (7)
 
mgeoffriau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 7,388
Total Cats: 474
Default

Why? Who are you expecting to argue that point?
mgeoffriau is offline  


Quick Reply: The Current Events, News, and Politics Thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 PM.