Vashthestampede

iTrader: (17)

^^^^

They may as well be rolled in dollar bills.

To date I've saved $4500 since I quit smoking.

gearhead_318

iTrader: (1)

Because Obama was the first one to tax cigs.

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

that's not how you are supossed to interperate it...

gearhead_318

iTrader: (1)

I think there are two ways of looking at it. One is that cigs are expensive, the other has to do with the Obama logo with "Taxes" written under it.

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

i guess it depends how far you scroll down your window...

gearhead_318

iTrader: (1)

...

blaen99

iTrader: (6)

BWAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH



Bristol Palin is now the spokesperson for the "no sex before marriage" campaigners.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

John Stuart Mill proclaimed that bad examples are necessary for all of us to learn from.

blaen99

iTrader: (6)

Dude. Bristol ------- Palin. Doing a PSA against premarital sex.

And the ad, oh god....

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

I don't see the problem.

blaen99

iTrader: (6)

trollface.jpg, eh Brainy?

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

no.


is it because it's bristol palin, or because it's a girl who "could" of had her life ruined by having a baby when she was 16 or whatever?

gearhead_318

iTrader: (1)

Exactly.

blaen99

iTrader: (6)

Did you watch the video, Brainy? It's on the level of epic trolling that....



is on.

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

do you also post weight watcher commericals where fat celebrities advertise the product?

or where paula deen, who has diabetes, is the spokesperson for a diebetes drug?

gearhead_318

iTrader: (1)

I was agreeing w/ you.

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

ive seen it. dude is old and is a spy for the vietkong. hell, i can't even remember my own name at times.

lol at the end, whoever wrote text in blue needs to think about one thing: 87,897,000 Americans are not in the labor force - 19.1% real unemployment.

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

sorry i cant keep you two straight.

blaen99

iTrader: (6)

19.1% real unemployment, eh? So, do we get to look at other president's numbers then Brainy?

You are trying to use one number for the rest, and another for Obama if you want to argue that.

Seriously, to try to argue that we should use different unemployment numbers under Obama then we have for every president since Bush Sr/Clinton is disingenuous at best.

P.S. The U6 number in 2001 was over 20%. U6 doesn't mean much in this context.

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

it doesn't matter about them. all that matters is the current rate is bonkers and not good.


but your facts are wrong:

7.3 7.4 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.9 7.8 8.1 8.7 9.3 9.4 9.6

u6 rate jan - dec 2001. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics


Unemployment Rate - U6 - 1994 - 2012