sixshooter

iTrader: (12)

Lol @ trying to run away like a little bitch when the cops got there. You want to hold a bus full of people hostage? You may not get officer beat walker asking you to please climb off the bus. You may get the SWAT team in tactical gear treating you like a terrorist hijacker. Laying in the street to block movement of a bus climbing on a bus from a legal standpoint. They did it wrong because ignorant. They did it at all because ignorant. Lol.

z31maniac

That was fantastic! It's too bad they didn't kick the s--- out of more of those a-------.

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

I don't think there are that many Black Africans getting killed by police is such numbers in the USA that it constitutes the label genocide.

Now, black Americans, shooting other black Americans on the other hand:

that static doesn't say how many of those blacks were African, but im assuming it was a low number...

shuiend

iTrader: (24)

California wants to quit the USA

Do they not realize the south tried to do this a while back, and were stomped on and it is not allowed. They can vote for it all they want, but it has been decided that once you go USA, you never go back. Also everyone there is afraid of guns, so how do they actually plan on fighting against the US for their freedom?

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

i think that's why they've been trying so hard to disarm us...

bahurd

iTrader: (8)

More BS by some 'activist' group who feels the need to protest instead of running for an actual office and trying to affect change via the democratic process. Doesn't matter the side of the fence...

capitalcrew

Eh, let em go. Presidential elections would start looking a lot different.

stratosteve

iTrader: (1)

Any discussions on sanctuary cities? It should be very interesting how this administration handles those cities.

Immigration fails under the fed. So can the feds force those cities into following federal law? Legally, I dont know. But they can pull back federal funding because the cities arent following federal law. That is a large chunk of change.

bahurd

iTrader: (8)

I recall an article that said in the Dem controlled states basically his threat to withhold funding was a pipe dream. Obviously in Rep held states the Governor/Legislature has more direct impact (can't find the article now).

Edit: http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-bl...ly-to-threaten

Edit: http://ktla.com/2017/01/27/trumps-th...t-he-cant-win/

stratosteve

iTrader: (1)

Interesting, thanks.

Funny how most libs were ok with Obama writing EO's for all the things because reasons and now they shout, noooooooo the prez cant work around congress etc.

bahurd

iTrader: (8)

Like Obama and all the presidents who preceded him with EO, my stance has always been they're legal unless struck down by the federal courts. It's how our system of checks and balances works.

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

thats because his EOs were violating law and order... something liberals love to do.

the president sets policy, our policy is currently dont let terrorists into the country unless they've been fully vetted.

remember, president Trump took an oath to:

support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic


and unlike liberals, some people take oaths seriously. There is nothing unconstitutional about preventing refugees into our country before being vetted. 1. they arent american citizens and therefore have no constitutional protections and 2. they have to be granted access (and they were just denied)

inb4 "but were are nation of immigrants" "correct, legal immigrants, bro".

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

milo "the white nationalist" gets it:

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

more ideal role models of the left:

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

willing to bet they still want free stuff provided by the hard working.

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

**** your local judge with no jurisdiction:

Customs agents ignore judge, enforce Trump?s travel ban: ACLU | New York Post

kaisersoze

iTrader: (8)

Probably just as funny as all the conservatives who bitched and moaned about executive overreach and how it was unconstitutional are totally fine when their tiny handed leader does it.
Same way that conservatives spent 8 years saying obama(elected by an actual majority of the popular vote) was illegitimate, born in kenya, calling him a muslim when he is obviously a christian. Now we have a president not elected by popular majority who has no demonstrable evidence that he is a christian( has actually had cameos in soft core **** and might be sex offender). But now we have to come together to support him right. He's our president right. see cognitive dissonance works in both directions.

bahurd

iTrader: (8)

Federal judge so of course she has jurisdiction over a federal statute.

shuiend

iTrader: (24)

Braineack

iTrader: (62)

The morally superior tolerant left: