Is this racist?
In response to the current ecomonic situation:
"If Bill Clinton had been in the White House and had failed to address this problem, we probably would be marching on the White House." - CBC Chairman Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) Is this Stockholm? |
das wasis
|
Racist? no...is this:
What was the best part about the million man march? Only 5 guys missed work. |
But that statement clearly displays his and the CBC's objection to Obama's policies that hurt the Black community. Yet because of, presumabily, his skin color, he chooses to downplay his anger.
He follows that quote with "There is a less-volatile reaction in the CBC because nobody wants to do anything that would empower the people who hate the president." To me it sounds like a bunch of bullshit and they don't want to admit a black person could be an utter failure, know that he could enact genocide on the black community, and still get away with 99% of the black vote. It a fucking shame to the black community that the democratic party manipulated them into believing they give a fucking rat's ass about them. They were bought and paid for, and htey don't want to admit they are still slaves to the system. Yet, every year we'll see these same familes burst into tears when their childern don't win the lotto for a school voucher or have to stand in bread lines to find work...but you know each and every one of them will vote democratic because they dont know two shits that they are voting for their own demise. Democrats ruined the black family. |
In for glorious thread.
Going off our political threads track record we should hit 100 pages by the end of the week. I wonder what kinda bullshit a certain *cough* few on here that defended him before are going to come up with this time. You can only use so many excuses before no one listens to you anymore. |
Our president is black.
Umad? |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 772984)
Democrats ruined the black family.
|
Originally Posted by DangBroski
(Post 773006)
Our president is black.
Umad? yes, but not because he's black. apparently you cant read, if anything should be taken away from my post is that I have empathy for the black community. |
Originally Posted by DangBroski
(Post 773006)
Our president is black.
Umad? |
Originally Posted by thirdgen
(Post 773007)
I was walking around at a sale the other day and I saw a book that was titled "If democrat's had brains, they'd be republican's". I don't care enough to read it, but for all you hardcore replublican supporters, perhaps it would be worth looking into.
|
This is racist:
http://sadhillnews.com/wp-content/up...-hill-news.jpg NAACP covers up statue of George Washington at rally so that it doesn't offend anyone. Try to have a rally in the shadow of the MLK monument in DC for any cause you like and propose covering it up. Go ahead, I dare you. I double dog dare you. Damarice (banned above) demonstrated the level of absolute genius that the black zombie voters are famous for. If the white people all voted for Obama's opponent because he was white, how would that be different than all of the black people voting for Obama because he was (half) black? Because all accounts are that nearly every single black person that voted went for Obama. How much more racist could you possibly be? And to make it worse all of them will vote for him again next time just because he is black. Grape Kool-Aid anyone? And when the black zombie voters (thanks to liberal thought pattern indoctrination) hear any challenges to any policy or action taken by Obama they are heavily outgunned on facts because they know nothing, so they scream 'racist'. They don't need anything but race to support their man. And they don't need to read a book or the newspaper because that's not telling them anything they need to know. They just need to know who is black and who isn't. Fucking racists. I actually enjoy engaging in policy conversations with black zombies that love Obama for no reason they can quantify. Then after a couple of minutes of quizzing I finally ask them, "Did you just want to see a black man become president?" to which the invariable answer is affirmative. And some of these people have advanced college degrees. Racist as hell. |
So glad that whiney fucking retard finally got banned
|
|
look up institutional racism. it's the loophole.
its only racist if youre a majority or in control. |
|
1 Attachment(s)
|
There's no way that THAT GUY is making fun of THAT GIRL.
|
if you take that guys hands away from his face it could easily be a sexual harassment poster
|
if the guy turned into a cup it could easily turn into an epic 2 girl 1 cup video as well.
|
So what I see in the poster is the institutional leftist discrimination against blue collar whites. "Hey, uncultured white construction worker. You are most likely to be disrespectful to Asians because you are not enlightened like me. I have a liberal arts degree in something that ends in 'Studies'."
|
So, you are saying that construction workers are on the right, and that the left discriminates against blue collar work?
:popcorn: This ought to be good. |
Is it racist that they made the Asian-looking woman eating with chopsticks?
|
Is it racist that they made the person to be racially abused Asian? So sick of this white people can't be victims of racism. I see it all the time... WHITEBOY.
|
Is it racism that I was created in the image of The Lord and my genetic pedigree inspired The Holocaust? Behold my genetic supremacy, Hustler The Aryamehr.
|
You wanna see racist? Watch TV. Look at the ads. Your local Home Depot is frequented by black family (with black dad. Yeah, right), and asians, and single (empowered) black chick and oh, by the way, white guy. Maybe some old white lady doing gardening.
You see the ads, you'd think the USA was 75% black, 20% asian, and maybe 2% plain old white people. Blacks are ALWAYS portrayed as the typical family with mom, dad and 2 kids (one boy, one girl, of course). They are ALWAYS portrayed as wearing yuppie middle class clothing, and being the perfect family. If white guys are shown, they're the evil contractors trying to rip you off, being fat slobs, and showing butt crack. Because, after all, it would be racist for anyone to object to such a typical suburban family, but the minorities scream bloody murder if the same commercial was made the other way around. White males, if shown at all, are the object of derision, being ignorant fools. |
Where is the "lady chinky eyes" reference in this thread? I know it saw it somewhere on this forum.
|
blackpeoplemeet.com
christianmingle.com (lol) WHY NO PAGANSINGLES.COM? |
discrimination? affirmative action
|
Originally Posted by blaen99
(Post 817429)
So, you are saying that construction workers are on the right, and that the left discriminates against blue collar work?
:popcorn: This ought to be good. First, ignoring the content of the question and mounting a personal attack: "You must be a part of the liberal arts intelligentsia or someone who sympathizes with their worldview and therefore no points you make can be seriously considered and must be dismissed offhand." Second, establish my rationale as being irrational: "You can't prove to me that anything I said is false because everything I believe is true simply because I believe it is true. I won't be dissuaded by your facts because I know what I know and you are wrong." I know you had high expectations. Was that good? |
lol @ people thinking liberals work in general.
|
Originally Posted by Gearhead_318
(Post 817562)
blackpeoplemeet.com
christianmingle.com (lol) WHY NO PAGANSINGLES.COM?
Originally Posted by bigx5murf
(Post 817856)
discrimination? affirmative action
|
Originally Posted by sixshooter
(Post 817425)
So what I see in the poster is the institutional leftist discrimination against blue collar whites. "Hey, uncultured white construction worker. You are most likely to be disrespectful to Asians because you are not enlightened like me. I have a liberal arts degree in something that ends in 'Studies'."
Originally Posted by sixshooter
(Post 817881)
For fun I have decided to employ two common modern leftist debating techniques in answering your question.
First, ignoring the content of the question and mounting a personal attack: "You must be a part of the liberal arts intelligentsia or someone who sympathizes with their worldview and therefore no points you make can be seriously considered and must be dismissed offhand." Second, establish my rationale as being irrational: "You can't prove to me that anything I said is false because everything I believe is true simply because I believe it is true. I won't be dissuaded by your facts because I know what I know and you are wrong." I know you had high expectations. Was that good? So, the left discriminates (Institutional discrimination, remember?) against blue collar workers (Or, if you will, blue collar work). The first half of my statement is true. Or are you claiming that you did not say the following above? So what I see in the poster is the institutional leftist discrimination against blue collar whites Uh oh. Did I catch you doing something against the left, and then proceeded to do the same thing on the right - and you took exception when I used that behavior on the right? |
You guys really entertain me with the political correct approach towards your politics and I really do care about who is in charge of the US cause it really does influence the whole ------ globe....but on a lighter note .....you guys think you have a problem with Obama....our country is being run by a president whom.....;
1.SAYS TO THE PRESS IN PUBLIC AS A COMMENT ON A RAPE CHARGE THAT HES NOT SCARED OR AFFRAID OF AIDS CAUSE HE TOOK A COLD SHOWER AFTER SEX?????:facepalm: 2.Has several wives LEGITAMATELY??????:bowrofl: 3.Blames every problem inthe current regime on a regime thats nearly extinct for almost twenty years now...:vash: 4.Our currency dropped in value by almost 150% 5.Is killing (litterally) and taxing with affirmative action, a MINORITY group (less than 10% of the population) 6.Managing to pass legislation that entitles them to reposses land with claims without compensation to the rightfull owner thereoff....becoming a serious Zimbabwe threat... 7.Where you get shot in your own home by trespassers wanting to rob you without the police or any kind or form of the authorities even bothering show up after several desperate phone calls....(multiple occasions and when you do reach the police they tell you they only have a single patrol car and its currently undergoing repairs)this is in the third largest city in the country.... Just for your enjoyment and to realise that your not really as far gone as you think....but food for thought!happy new year and blessing to all fellow miata fans! |
Wow Oldschool, you have my utmost condolences.
I just argue in here for fun and to pass the time. I.e., I only get into it hot and heavy with Brainy 'cause I respect the hell out of the dude and it's fun to argue with him, not because of any overriding political bent. I can't speak for anyone else, but it would seriously surprise me if I was the only one. |
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 817916)
lol @ people thinking liberals work in general.
Come on underachievers Come on all you underpass believers We’ll give you the skill for street livin’ It feels pretty great to just give in, so just give in Dropouts, repeat offenders We’ll take the weary, weak, the street bartenders Show ‘em the best times are on the street Satisfaction through the thrill of defeat, ain’t it sweet Once you stop yourself from caring About owning stuff, that’s when you wanna start sharing Cuz all the things we want are cheap or free I define success as not working and I live like a king We’ve got no competition We’ve got no accomplished mission We just wanna live and let others live Of course we’ll take anything you wanna give, so ------- give Come on, dance like a retard Life’s an endless party not a punch card I don’t understand some people’s drive Let’s just ---- and drink and be alive, not just survive. |
I think there is some confusion between racism and prejudice in this thread. But still lul read.
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 772976)
Is this Stockholm?
/swede |
Originally Posted by Sentic
(Post 818090)
I don't get this, care to explain?
/swede |
it made more sense 4 months ago when it happened...
|
Originally Posted by blaen99
(Post 818014)
"institutional leftist discrimination against blue collar whites".
So, the left discriminates (Institutional discrimination, remember?) against blue collar workers (Or, if you will, blue collar work). The first half of my statement is true. Or are you claiming that you did not say the following above? Inversely, since the left discriminates against blue collar work, this would mean that they (blue collar workers) would typically be on the right. Uh oh. Did I catch you doing something against the left, and then proceeded to do the same thing on the right - and you took exception when I used that behavior on the right? And I never said that the left discriminates against blue collar work. Do not manufacture things that you may perceive but that I haven't said. That is yet another straw man. The left enjoys the fruits of the blue collar work that they have successfully unionized into funding their causes. The elites still look down upon them as proles. And yes, the vast majority of non-union, non-minority, blue collar workers are right-leaning. And I can't make heads or tails of your last couple of sentences but if it was based on attacking me for the false premise you attributed to me just before it, go ahead and knock that straw man down with a vengeance. |
I'm totally cool with being stereotyped as a racist redneck. White skin, guns, Jesus.
|
Originally Posted by sixshooter
(Post 818478)
Do I have to say rednecks for you to understand it? I was trying not to but there it is. The liberals in academia and their pointy-headed followers look down on blue collar workers and think they are all racist rednecks, including the union trolls that are also in their party. They look at them as the "useful idiots" of their political movement, which is a term widely attributed to Vladimir Lenin but that doesn't appear in any of his published works.
And I never said that the left discriminates against blue collar work. Do not manufacture things that you may perceive but that I haven't said. That is yet another straw man. The left enjoys the fruits of the blue collar work that they have successfully unionized into funding their causes. The elites still look down upon them as proles. And yes, the vast majority of non-union, non-minority, blue collar workers are right-leaning. And I can't make heads or tails of your last couple of sentences but if it was based on attacking me for the false premise you attributed to me just before it, go ahead and knock that straw man down with a vengeance. Before I respond and to try to calibrate my response, do you believe there is also a leftist bias in universities? |
"I guess it's more interesting to imagine this conflicted situation here and a strong woman. But that's been an image that people have tried to paint of me since the day Barack announced [he would run for president] - that I'm some angry black woman," |
1 Attachment(s)
|
Originally Posted by Gearhead_318
(Post 817562)
WHY NO PAGANSINGLES.COM?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands