Rand Paul voted against it
http://www.wbko.com/news/headlines/R...8.html?ref=128 instead of listing all those who betrayed us i will list those who have stood by us Coburn (R-OK) Harkin (D-IA) Lee (R-UT) Merkley (D-OR) Paul (R-KY) Sanders (I-VT) Wyden (D-OR) |
Why was the Senate hell bent on passing this turd anyway?
|
because they want more power to do whatever they want
take out political enemies or whatever who knows certainly not actual terrorist considering the definition of a terrorist according to the patriot act it is clearly a law prime for abuse what i am wondering is why would these men not want more power? |
Originally Posted by jared8783
(Post 802198)
because they want more power to do whatever they want
take out political enemies or whatever who knows certainly not actual terrorist considering the definition of a terrorist according to the patriot act it is clearly a law prime for abuse what i am wondering is why would these men not want more power? |
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 802239)
So, when is "owning a firearm" going to get me prosecuted with this law?
it is when you commit any crime that could be considered dangerous to human life that one could legally consider you a terrorist and since these new powers are exempt from the freedom of information act then what is to stop them from abusing their power and detaining someone who hasn't fit the legal definition of a terrorist oh i almost forgot the reason this is being made into a big deal is because there will be NO PROSECUTION so no your not gonna get prosecuted just simply locked away til they feel like lettin ya out that is if they ever feel like it |
Originally Posted by jared8783
(Post 803116)
who said anything about owning a firearm?
it is when you commit any crime that could be considered dangerous to human life that one could legally consider you a terrorist and since these new powers are exempt from the freedom of information act then what is to stop them from abusing their power and detaining someone who hasn't fit the legal definition of a terrorist oh i almost forgot the reason this is being made into a big deal is because there will be NO PROSECUTION so no your not gonna get prosecuted just simply locked away til they feel like lettin ya out that is if they ever feel like it He doesn't need to threaten anyone with it. |
i think this is a definition that the vast majority of us could agree that our law should use to define terrorism
The use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims. |
|
http://www.infowars.com/indefinite-d...o-obamas-desk/
Looks like they as passing a law that allows the us govt to imprision you indefinitely if they subjectively decide you are an "enemy" |
blaen99 be sure to check out brains link ^^
it now seems obama no longer intends (that is if he even did in the first place) on vetoing this i heard lars larson on the radio the other day talking saying to someone that only four americans have met this definition before he said he had an expert,former prosecuter talk about it on his show here is the clip http://soundcloud.com/thelarslarsons...ccarthy-on-the he says only four americans in ten years fit the definition of enemy combatant and not all terrorists fit the definition first of all lars can you seriously clarify something like this in 1:09? wtf second i can't take anyone seriously when they don't reference specific sections of the bill i skimmed the bill but did not find it when i get some time i will look some more but from what i understand the definition of enemy combatant is somewhere else but first i gotta look at the bill and see if it truly only applies to enemy combatants and if being a domestic terrorist according to sec.802 of the patriot act makes you an enemy combatant then yeah this bill is fucked up and regardless of everything i just typed even if the definition is extremely as it is claimed to be it is still in direct violation of the constitution and that is disgusting |
Yeah, don't start me on that.
Intellectually, I know there's no point in Obama veto'ing it except for political theatre purposes due to how many votes it passed in the Senate (92-7 IIRC?!?), so... But emotionally it's like "EFF YOU OBAMA". Ugh. |
one thing congress cna always agree on is how to fuck you.
|
|
well it is official now
obama has signed the law one more thing we can add to his list of lies imo this is one of the worst ones http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...MPLATE=DEFAULT |
i like this guy
his attitude is hilarious and he usually has a very good point and he is a big RP supporter |
Actually the NDAA is null and void, not that this will keep them from using it. Any law or act which opposes the constitution or the bill of rights is null and void. This has been won in supreme court over and over and over.
|
i propose we all move to canada, and start a massive canadian miata club.
|
Originally Posted by redturbomiata
(Post 822475)
i propose we all move to canada, and start a massive canadian miata club.
|
Originally Posted by 1slowna
(Post 822474)
Actually the NDAA is null and void, not that this will keep them from using it. Any law or act which opposes the constitution or the bill of rights is null and void. This has been won in supreme court over and over and over.
not saying you are wrong but there are obviously other things that violate the constitution that are in place patriot act |
Well apparently some states are fightin back on this NDAA pile of crap
here is an article about what virginia did about it http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews...tes-join-fight |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:44 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands