Originally Posted by Toddcod
(Post 567493)
I love THIS!
I'm a huge gun lover... But I won't carry one for daily etc. If you pull a gun you ay have to use it. I'm to pretty for jail. HA ha. |
Originally Posted by browning
(Post 566392)
hand guns are banned in some bigger cities like dc chicago ect... even if you are defending yourself against deadly force. it is still a felonly and you will go to jail.
|
believe it or not, dumb fuck liberals like me agree that the DC gun ban was unconstitutional. it's just not my cause.
|
^^^ Hey, I thought you moved it here so you didn't have to read it??... :inout: Face it, deep down you know you want to be a conservative... :)
It makes me feel great to know that I work my ass off to pay for the fat lazy welfare whore up town that has spawned 10 kids b/c she gets more cash per head. Like she's a subsidized meat farmer... of which most will land in jail or be slaughterd on the streets... |
CWP is the way to go for this one... Fair warning, if you see me pull it on someone in a situation that calls for it is being used. With me being 5'6" and 140 lbs, I think I would be in the realm to claim self-defense.
|
Originally Posted by magnamx-5
(Post 567511)
actualy the supreme court overturned the DC handgun ban a few yrs ago man where the hell have you been?
|
*digging through politics section*
for what it's worth, if there was a DISincentive to have more than a kid or two, there wouldn't be so many babies on welfare or anywhere else. those damn rugrats use up resources worse than your hummer. |
Originally Posted by y8s
(Post 578676)
for what it's worth, if there was a DISincentive to have more than a kid or two, there wouldn't be so many babies on welfare or anywhere else. those damn rugrats use up resources worse than your hummer. I hear people talk about "parenting licenses" which I have a really big problem with, but could see a financial barrier being effective without too much government intrusion or added bureaucracy. People tend to take better care of things that cost them. Realizing they have to pay taxes on another kid, rather than being rewarded and subsidized baby making machines, may spur more to not only have less kids than they can afford and manage to raise, but be better parents of the kids they do have. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands