DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Is 3" all the way a good thing!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2007, 12:28 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
mxdrift's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 119
Total Cats: 0
Default Is 3" all the way a good thing!!

Hello, I can't figure out if i should go with 3" downpipe all the way or 2.5".
What the difference besides more air flow and looks.
mxdrift is offline  
Old 10-14-2007, 12:42 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
fmowry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Severn, MD
Posts: 1,907
Total Cats: 6
Default

cost, exhaust volume, and fitting are the negatives of 3 inch vs 2.5.

Frank
fmowry is offline  
Old 10-14-2007, 12:58 PM
  #3  
Newb
 
nuvolarossa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Italy, €urope.
Posts: 22
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fmowry
exhaust volume
You mean exhaust noise?

I'm the same boat.
at start I was tempted to do all 3" for future upgrades... but now I think that 2,5" is more than enough for what I want:gay:
nuvolarossa is offline  
Old 10-14-2007, 01:31 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Al Hounos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Knoxville
Posts: 1,168
Total Cats: 0
Default

didn't we JUST have a thread about this?
Al Hounos is offline  
Old 10-14-2007, 01:56 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
mxdrift's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 119
Total Cats: 0
Default

ohh sorry i didn't check to see if there was one
mxdrift is offline  
Old 10-14-2007, 02:38 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Kelly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sammamish, Washington
Posts: 1,396
Total Cats: 0
Default

3" isn't really any louder with all things being equal. You can have a near silent but well flowing 3" system.
Kelly is offline  
Old 10-14-2007, 10:34 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
Tesseracter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 0
Default

corky says that your downpipe MUST start at the size of your turbo outlet flange, and should only increase from there at no more than 15 degrees at a time. a sudden change in size, and therefore pressure, will result in a turbulent flow, and therefore more drag, making it less efficent than a smoothly changed diameter pipe.

after that, 3" would be better(no exhaust would be best) but a 2.5" system that is smoother with less restrictions would be better than a 3" system with shitty welds and lots of bends.
Tesseracter is offline  
Old 10-14-2007, 10:47 PM
  #8  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

I don't think it matters. Hondas make 700+whp with 3" turbo back exhausts. I doubt "turbulent" flow is a concern in their minds when it comes to the exhaust.
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 10-14-2007, 11:39 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Al Hounos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Knoxville
Posts: 1,168
Total Cats: 0
Default

Is there any dyno proof of corky's theory? I don't doubt the theory, but I do doubt that the turbulence has any noticeable negative effect on flow in a real-world application.
Al Hounos is offline  
Old 10-14-2007, 11:48 PM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

There is no dyno proof as far as I know. As far as I'm concerned there is no such thing as non-turbulent flow exiting a turbine.
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 10-15-2007, 12:47 AM
  #11  
Miotta FTW!
iTrader: (24)
 
Splitime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Posts: 4,290
Total Cats: 31
Default

Originally Posted by Tesseracter
corky says that your downpipe MUST start at the size of your turbo outlet flange, and should only increase from there at no more than 15 degrees at a time. a sudden change in size, and therefore pressure, will result in a turbulent flow, and therefore more drag, making it less efficent than a smoothly changed diameter pipe.

after that, 3" would be better(no exhaust would be best) but a 2.5" system that is smoother with less restrictions would be better than a 3" system with shitty welds and lots of bends.
I have a 3" vband welded to the turbine housing of my t3 60/63 and I can make 15psi just past 3500rpm on my honda 1.6l.

I'm all for 3" as soon as you can get it. To me its the best compromise of size/cost/fitment/sound etc...
On that note... I won't run any turbo car with less than 3" at this point.

Did I mention that the 3" off the turbo and all the way back... is on my beater?
Splitime is offline  
Old 10-15-2007, 12:50 AM
  #12  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Toyota Supras start at 4" downpipes, and they make 5" and even 6" downpipes. You want a 3" downpipe.

BEGI's 2.75" DP starts at 2.25" or so and steps up slowly like Corky talks about to the end size. You can have them make it into a 3" DP at the end for another $30 or so. Order up a 3" Enthuza setup, and the car will be nice and quiet and flow very nicely.
Savington is offline  
Old 10-15-2007, 03:09 PM
  #13  
Newb
 
BEGITechRep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 29
Total Cats: 0
Default

Avoid turbulence (easier said than done).
Avoid steps and abrupt transistions in size.
Mandrel-bent pipes.
Swage the pipes so pipe inlets fit "over" the previous pipe's outlet.
Avoid sharp turns or protruberances.
Use quality catalytic convertor and muffler.
Reduce backpressure as much as possible after the turbo.
Separate the wastegate flow from the main flow.
Don't forget you have to fit all of that under the car and into the engine compartment. The larger everything is the more likely the exhaust will bang on the frame under cornering or when the engine torques. Mazda Competition's racing motor mounts helped my car significantly.

My system that Corky custom-built for me?
Downpipe entry: 4 inches square area
Downpipe to cat: 4.9 inches square
Mid-pipe: 7.1 inches square
Muffler inlet: 8 inches square
Exhaust outlet: 9.6 inches square

And...he guaranteed me at least one horsepower increase over stock. Pretty good deal in my book....

Barry
PS. I'm still waiting to hear confirmation from Corky about the final details of the Bonneville Streamliner on which he modified the intercooling system. The fellow who ran that Streamliner and another one (the guy makes a good living) at Bonneville set a new class record and, first time at Bonneville, became the 8th fastest human on wheels. Corky does good work.

Now...time for me to get back to work.
BEGITechRep is offline  
Old 10-15-2007, 03:33 PM
  #14  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

yep sounds like my new setup:

turbo is 2.25" outlet
DP 2.5" steps to 2.75"
test pipe 2.75" steps to 3.0"
catback 3.0" to the tip.
Braineack is offline  
Old 10-15-2007, 03:35 PM
  #15  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

Mines gonna be 3" turbo back.
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 10-15-2007, 03:36 PM
  #16  
Newb
 
Joey94R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cartersville, GA
Posts: 36
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BEGITechRep
And...he guaranteed me at least one horsepower increase over stock. Pretty good deal in my book....
Just wondering...How much did that one guaranteed horsepower cost? for more than one guaranteed horsepower
Joey94R is offline  
Old 10-15-2007, 03:38 PM
  #17  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

Originally Posted by neogenesis2004
Mines gonna be 3" turbo back.


you mean: 4" to 3" turbo back. :gay:
Braineack is offline  
Old 10-15-2007, 04:09 PM
  #18  
Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
neogenesis2004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,413
Total Cats: 20
Default

thats what i said :P
neogenesis2004 is offline  
Old 10-15-2007, 04:30 PM
  #19  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
PAT!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 464
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Toyota Supras start at 4" downpipes, and they make 5" and even 6" downpipes. You want a 3" downpipe.

BEGI's 2.75" DP starts at 2.25" or so and steps up slowly like Corky talks about to the end size. You can have them make it into a 3" DP at the end for another $30 or so. Order up a 3" Enthuza setup, and the car will be nice and quiet and flow very nicely.
I used to make a turbo kit for the MKIV Supra, 3.1 inch ID on the DP, if I remember correctly. Which was an exact match for the turbine outlets we used. No difference on a car making 913 to the wheels when we switched to a 4 inch downpipe.
PAT! is offline  
Old 10-15-2007, 06:13 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
 
Tesseracter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 0
Default

Thanks BEGITechRep and others for stepping in and helping me out. Maximum boost and the BEGI website is fresh in my mind, but since I dont have a turbo yet, I feel like I dont have any real rep points here. when someone starts spouting their HP PSI details at me, ive got nothing to go on, unless they have tried scientific studies with various sized pipes.

i also am aiming for a similar goal as corky's engineering goal, which is the most HP per PSI, not total PSI. once I get my system up and running, then I can start bouncing numbers back when people say "ZOMG, ive got 30 more HP than you running 15 more PSI!!!1"
Tesseracter is offline  


Quick Reply: Is 3" all the way a good thing!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 PM.