EGT: Placement, probe source, limits, and even necessary?
My LMA logs EGT and I already have the wires so I was thinking about logging it. Few questions.
I see that #4 runner is the hottest, but near the collector would work also (preferable?). Max temps? I've heard over 1600F is bad, but anyone have a more accurate/realistic number? I found this quickly searching. Seems cheap. Anyone here sell probes? Any Type K sensor. http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalo.../micro5egt.php Lastly, is monitoring EGTs even necessary? Seems like with accurate AFR readings, EGT is kinda, uh "outdated" I guess. (??) Seems to be more of a "safety" thing.. |
IMO egts are nice to know for fine tuning w/o a dyno. One more piece of data to reference when going through logs or tuning.
For a single probe, preferrable location is right at the turbine inlet so you can see a cumulative temp. That should show your peak temp since that's the convergence point of all gas and the point of resistance to exhaust being forced into the turbine housing. You could also place bungs at each runner to check the individual tuning of each cyldiner. Then make four dyno/DL runs, moving the probe between each run. As far as peak EGTs, there's numerous arguments to what is too high. Lots of guys see peaks right at 1600f measured at the turbine intake and don't have problems. mnet EGT post 1 from this thread and another one That looks like the going rate to me for a K sensor. IMO the EGT shows more detail about the combustion- vs. the AFR showing detail on the product of the combustion. Make sense? IOW - the AFR would never show a tune that was over fueled and/or under advanced IF "all" the fuel was being burnt- even though it was being burnt outside of the cylinder- in the manifold. Being able to determine that with an excessive EGT is having the ability to recover available power. For me, I uncovered an over advance that was being knock prevented by over fueling (under 100kpa). High EGTs where the tip off something was wrong. -rob |
Originally Posted by m2cupcar
(Post 55987)
One more piece of data to reference
Originally Posted by m2cupcar
(Post 55987)
For a single probe, preferrable location is right at the turbine inlet so you can see a cumulative temp. That should show your peak temp since that's the convergence point of all gas and the point of resistance to exhaust being forced into the turbine housing. You could also place bungs at each runner to check the individual tuning of each cyldiner. Then make four dyno/DL runs, moving the probe between each run.
Originally Posted by m2cupcar
(Post 55987)
As far as peak EGTs, there's numerous arguments to what is too high. Lots of guys see peaks right at 1600f measured at the turbine intake and don't have problems.
Originally Posted by m2cupcar
(Post 55987)
IMO the EGT shows more detail about the combustion- vs. the AFR showing detail on the product of the combustion. Make sense? IOW - the AFR would never show a tune that was over fueled and/or under advanced IF "all" the fuel was being burnt- even though it was being burnt outside of the cylinder- in the manifold. Being able to determine that with an excessive EGT is having the ability to recover available power. For me, I uncovered an over advance that was being knock prevented by over fueling (under 100kpa). High EGTs where the tip off something was wrong. -rob
|
Braineack, Wideopen, whoever I'm forgetting,
You guys sell probes? |
Don't weld it in. It will fail eventually and need to be replaced. I have mine in the same position as IntrnlStorm on one of the referenced threads.
The one that came with my Zeitronix was open and used to catch little pieces of carbon and shoot way high. Then the gases finally eroded it. I bought a GReddy replacement and it has been fine, albeit slightly slower due to the tip being enclosed(milliseconds) |
I don't sell probes but will have an Autometer EGT gauge and probe setup for sale very soon for around $75. Also, I tapped about 2 inches away from the head on cylinder 4 when I had my Miata.
|
I only have one location at the collector, about 1" from the turbine housing flange. There's too many other things to do before worrying about individual cylinder data. I have a coolant reroute by default anyway. No reports of a hot number 4 from the fwd crowd on the FE3 either.
I'm using the autometer egt/probe and it's worked great. The only hiccup was a shared ground that was causing the egt gauge to flake out. Provided a "solo" ground and it has been perfect ever since. I'm using the clamp to hold it in on an odd shaped collector and it works fine. |
Originally Posted by olderguy
(Post 56021)
Don't weld it in. It will fail eventually and need to be replaced.
|
Originally Posted by m2cupcar
(Post 56039)
There's too many other things to do before worrying about individual cylinder data...No reports of a hot number 4 from the fwd crowd on the FE3 either.
Originally Posted by Wideopentuning
(Post 56024)
I don't sell probes but will have an Autometer EGT gauge and probe setup for sale very soon for around $75.
Just need the probe. |
Originally Posted by UofACATS
(Post 56047)
Amazing. The stuff I don't think about :o
Thats how my autometer one is setup on my civic. From everything I've looked into and been told... the ideal setup is one per cylinder... 2 inches from the head. If not... pick the hotest. On the civic that is cyl3, so I have it 2 inches from the head there... then i can monitor the hottest conditions that will come out of the motor. I'll be running one on my miotta project... just unsure of where... it'll have dual feed rail and coolant reroute... so possibly just in the collector for an overall look. |
I would be interested in your EGT gauge.
hrk |
I was going to weld a bung, but several recommended the clamp and ceramic gasket and it's worked. Saved me the work of removing the header. I think the location depends on what you're after. Agreed a probe per cylinder is ideal. I think knowing the TIT gives a "big picture" of overall engine tune. - rob
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands