Garrett vs EFR at DIYAutotune discussion
06-18-2014, 01:42 PM
#105
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,950
Total Cats: 1,003
well, obviously that's the case. The difference between the 2560 and EFR could be attributed to a little more humidity or a little lower ambient temperature on the two different dyno days.
The noobs have been right all along!
The noobs have been right all along!
Reply
0
0
20psi
06-19-2014, 11:35 AM
#111
dude I made almost identical TQ and HP on same turbo (he is using 6258, and so was I, 2 years ago)
his:
http://i1084.photobucket.com/albums/...9.jpg~original
his:
http://i1084.photobucket.com/albums/...9.jpg~original
Sure, my point/questions though:
1) Why aren't the 6258 cars romping on this particular 2560 car?
2) Why isn't the record breaking 2560 car mopping the floor with the 6258 cars now that is has a magical 6758?
Or did thenuge24 answer it?
Reply
0
0
06-19-2014, 05:48 PM
#112
Then there's this, just to **** everything up even more.
I don't even know what's real anymore.
https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo...9/#post1141624
I don't even know what's real anymore.
https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo...9/#post1141624
I have an Artech ramhorm manifold with my EFR 6258. I made 315WHP @ 12PSI and 323WHP @ 14PSI on a Mustang dyno in El Paso, TX (approx 4000' elevation). I also have a 3" exhaust and 2.75" intercooler pipes with a Precision 600 intercooler. This a a mild steel manifold, not SS.
315WHP and 251TQ at around 12PSI (179kPa)
323WHP / 262WTQ @ 14 PSI
There was a problem with my manual boost controller in the second dyno. I could have made more power. I'm now running EBC.
Moar pics of manifold
315WHP and 251TQ at around 12PSI (179kPa)
323WHP / 262WTQ @ 14 PSI
There was a problem with my manual boost controller in the second dyno. I could have made more power. I'm now running EBC.
Moar pics of manifold
Reply
0
0
09-02-2014, 08:51 PM
#116
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
Well, this car is back to try to make m0ar power out of the EFR. We'll see. I am hopeful for the car's owner because I want nothing but success for him.
Reply
0
0
09-05-2014, 02:40 PM
#118
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
Well the EFR car came back with a new external gate (internal gate was sealed) and a 4" exhaust. It didn't make any more power than last time and still makes less power than the 2560 did.
The car's owner is going to go back through the motor and look for anything that can explain it.
The car's owner is going to go back through the motor and look for anything that can explain it.
Reply
0
0
09-05-2014, 03:59 PM
#120
Elite Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Well the EFR car came back with a new external gate (internal gate was sealed) and a 4" exhaust. It didn't make any more power than last time and still makes less power than the 2560 did.
The car's owner is going to go back through the motor and look for anything that can explain it.
The car's owner is going to go back through the motor and look for anything that can explain it.
LOL @ upgrading to 4" exhaust without first measuring backpressures.
Reply
0
0
