DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

gt28rs vs 19T vs 16g: getting parts ready

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2010, 10:38 AM
  #61  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
spoolin2bars's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: south texas
Posts: 1,415
Total Cats: 10
Default

you make me laugh with your "real" dyno ****. you still don't get it huh. someday maybe.
spoolin2bars is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 11:00 AM
  #62  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by spoolin2bars
you make me laugh with your "real" dyno ****. you still don't get it huh. someday maybe.
What the FACT that loaded dynos read lower than dynojets? therefore 300rwhp on a proper mustang would be something like 320rwhp on a dynojet? is that what?
Braineack is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 12:36 PM
  #63  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
What the FACT that loaded dynos read lower than dynojets? therefore 300rwhp on a proper mustang would be something like 320rwhp on a dynojet? is that what?
12% difference on a Mustand or DD compared to a Dynojet in my experience. Anyone who's used a "real dyno" agrees that load dynos are "real," and Dynojets are failaids.

I may get on a dynojet tomorrow, hopefully I don't break it with my massive, intoxicating torque.
hustler is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 12:45 PM
  #64  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

you must have such a small *****...oh wait I know this.
Braineack is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 01:30 PM
  #65  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
you must have such a small *****...oh wait I know this.
What I lack in girth I make-up for in homosexual pig lust. You're a dirty sow and with any luck I'll reward you with my glorious scat payload.
hustler is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 01:41 PM
  #66  
Junior Member
 
94blackmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: maine
Posts: 221
Total Cats: -1
Default

guys the dyno is just a tool to help you get the most out of your car. they all read different to a point. Yes a load dyno is going to be lower. But for the purpose of tuning they both work.
94blackmx5 is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 01:42 PM
  #67  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
webby459's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 1,461
Total Cats: 4
Default

Originally Posted by 94blackmx5
guys the dyno is just a tool to help you get the most out of your car. they all read different to a point. Yes a load dyno is going to be lower. But for the purpose of tuning they both work.
Never ever bring reason into an argument on here.

**** off.
webby459 is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 02:13 PM
  #68  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by 94blackmx5
guys the dyno is just a tool to help you get the most out of your car. they all read different to a point. Yes a load dyno is going to be lower. But for the purpose of tuning they both work.
I get what you're trying to say here, but you can't fully tune a car on a Dynojet. They are absolutely worthless IMO.
Savington is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 02:38 PM
  #69  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Gotpsi?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Central, TX / Bay area, CA
Posts: 1,260
Total Cats: 5
Default

We need to start a 1.6/W big turbo club on here. must have at least 2860 to join
Gotpsi? is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 02:42 PM
  #70  
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
miatauser884's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,959
Total Cats: 11
Default

I thought dynojets were good??? In ground chassis dyno Dynojet 224X 2wd In-Ground Chassis Dyno was what mine was tuned on. Why are they crap?

I'm just going to drive to Atlanta to get my car tuned next time.
miatauser884 is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 04:16 PM
  #71  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
shlammed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kingston, Ontario
Posts: 2,910
Total Cats: 51
Default

Originally Posted by Gotpsi?
We need to start a 1.6/W big turbo club on here. must have at least 2860 to join
member #2.
i have 2860.
shlammed is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 04:50 PM
  #72  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by djp0623
I thought dynojets were good??? In ground chassis dyno Dynojet 224X 2wd In-Ground Chassis Dyno was what mine was tuned on. Why are they crap?

I'm just going to drive to Atlanta to get my car tuned next time.
Let me guess, they just did pull after pull after pull without any driveability tuning?

I spend 30 minutes at the beginning of every dyno session with the load-bearing function, going through 80% of the fuel map (everything under 5500rpm and ~150kpa) and dialing in the AFRs at every RPM and load range. 90% of the benefit of a dyno is in this - what would take you like 3-4 hours to get perfect on the road (or a couple dozen VEA logs) can be done in 30 minutes on a dyno - and 3-4 hours assumes you have a driver who knows EXACTLY what needs to be done, and brakes good enough that you can hold 4-5psi at 5000rpm in 3rd gear without melting the crap out of them. The cars I tune roll off the dyno with perfect driveability, every time.

The rest of the time can be done on a Dynojet, but who cares, because it can also be done on highway onramps.

The only Dynojets worth anything are the load-bearing ones, and if your operator isn't bragging about that then he probably doesn't have it (and doesn't want you know that he's too cheap/stupid to have it).
Savington is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 08:20 PM
  #73  
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
levnubhin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Let me guess, they just did pull after pull after pull without any driveability tuning?

I spend 30 minutes at the beginning of every dyno session with the load-bearing function, going through 80% of the fuel map (everything under 5500rpm and ~150kpa) and dialing in the AFRs at every RPM and load range. 90% of the benefit of a dyno is in this - what would take you like 3-4 hours to get perfect on the road (or a couple dozen VEA logs) can be done in 30 minutes on a dyno - and 3-4 hours assumes you have a driver who knows EXACTLY what needs to be done, and brakes good enough that you can hold 4-5psi at 5000rpm in 3rd gear without melting the crap out of them. The cars I tune roll off the dyno with perfect driveability, every time.

The rest of the time can be done on a Dynojet, but who cares, because it can also be done on highway onramps.

The only Dynojets worth anything are the load-bearing ones, and if your operator isn't bragging about that then he probably doesn't have it (and doesn't want you know that he's too cheap/stupid to have it).


I wish we lived closer to each other.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
levnubhin is offline  
Old 01-15-2010, 09:24 PM
  #74  
Junior Member
 
94blackmx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: maine
Posts: 221
Total Cats: -1
Default

Originally Posted by webby459
Never ever bring reason into an argument on here.

**** off.
i do as i please, and always will. i might not be a turbo guru, but if i have something to say it will get said.
94blackmx5 is offline  
Old 01-16-2010, 05:32 PM
  #75  
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
miatauser884's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,959
Total Cats: 11
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Let me guess, they just did pull after pull after pull without any driveability tuning?

I spend 30 minutes at the beginning of every dyno session with the load-bearing function, going through 80% of the fuel map (everything under 5500rpm and ~150kpa) and dialing in the AFRs at every RPM and load range. 90% of the benefit of a dyno is in this - what would take you like 3-4 hours to get perfect on the road (or a couple dozen VEA logs) can be done in 30 minutes on a dyno - and 3-4 hours assumes you have a driver who knows EXACTLY what needs to be done, and brakes good enough that you can hold 4-5psi at 5000rpm in 3rd gear without melting the crap out of them. The cars I tune roll off the dyno with perfect driveability, every time.

The rest of the time can be done on a Dynojet, but who cares, because it can also be done on highway onramps.

The only Dynojets worth anything are the load-bearing ones, and if your operator isn't bragging about that then he probably doesn't have it (and doesn't want you know that he's too cheap/stupid to have it).
He did soem normal cruise rpms before doing the longer pulls and adjusting spark/fuel.

Trackmasters, Inc
miatauser884 is offline  
Old 01-16-2010, 05:33 PM
  #76  
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
miatauser884's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,959
Total Cats: 11
Default

Originally Posted by levnubhin
This Saturday! Same dyno.
What's the good word? Post those numbers!
miatauser884 is offline  
Old 01-16-2010, 06:56 PM
  #77  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by djp0623
He did soem normal cruise rpms before doing the longer pulls and adjusting spark/fuel.

Trackmasters, Inc
Did the dyno hold him at a certain RPM, or did he just cruise along with no load on the motor and adjust stuff?
Savington is offline  
Old 01-16-2010, 08:34 PM
  #78  
Elite Member
iTrader: (30)
 
levnubhin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by djp0623
What's the good word? Post those numbers!

279 whp / 270 wtq (on a Mustang dyno) boost peaks at 22 and then tapers to 20. I'm happy but I want 300's now and it isn't gonna happen with my lack of flow. My cast mani and 2.5" dp need to go. Soon as I get them replaced I'll be going back. I'm also going to need an intake manifold to cure the massive torque drop to red line. But I'm happy, the car is a blast to drive and it still has plenty more potential.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
levnubhin is offline  
Old 01-16-2010, 09:18 PM
  #79  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Phil, would a .86 Garrett housing fit on your turbo? Nobody has done a direct comparison yet.
Savington is offline  
Old 01-16-2010, 11:48 PM
  #80  
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
miatauser884's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,959
Total Cats: 11
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
Did the dyno hold him at a certain RPM, or did he just cruise along with no load on the motor and adjust stuff?
I'd love to tell you I had a clue, but I don't. It ran great after the tune. However, I am convinced that for my next tune I want to seek an establishment a little more dedicated to miatas and MS. I've put too much money into everything to "go with the flow"

So, give me your recommendations for tuners withing 4 hrs of huntsville, AL. This would include Atlanta, Memphis, Knoxville, Chattanooga, Birmingham, etc.

However, since my diypnp came from Atlanta, Atlanta seems like a logical choice.
miatauser884 is offline  


Quick Reply: gt28rs vs 19T vs 16g: getting parts ready



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 AM.