Originally Posted by Atlanta93LE (Post 240691)

See you in 2 minutes.

Originally Posted by Braineack (Post 240684)

if that were the case, then why have i been arguing that all day.

im spent, im going home to get laid. and yes my wife is hot. fuck all you.

:bowrofl:

Originally Posted by Braineack (Post 240596)

yep, youtube videos for all your turbo information. There are plenty of hondas making 650rwhp with a Stage I .63 A/R T3 turbine.



no. because the a/r has a lot to do with ultimate power output, like i posted the graph of previously. If i wanted to make shit tons of power, I'd choose a larger A/R and possible go with a stage higher turbine wheel. This lessens the overlap of the blades on the wheel to further reduce backpressure and increase the velocity. It's all a compromise. Since I chose overall performance me T3 utilizes a .48 A/R, if I want top end only for that 2000RPM powerband, I'd go with a .63 and make more power per psi. If I went with a larger turbine and a larger a/r, chances are it may not spool at all.

Originally Posted by Joseph Davis

I sprayed a 100 shot of nitrous across a stage 5 wheel with .63 housing, it started choking in the low 600 range and the car went full rich since the engine couldn't breathe enough air to burn the fuel provided by the injectors and nitrous jet. If I'd had the time I could have set up secondary mappings to pull fuel past 7500 rpms (where it went rich) when the nitrous was flowing and might have hit 650+. Probably wouldn't have been worth the time it took, though.