ITBS + plenum + turbo = worthwhile gain?
alright, I've got another thread that might potentially fire up the flamethrowers, but here goes. The facts are, I'm putting together a forged internals bottom end, but I haven't got pistons yet. Got carillo A rods though.
Basically, I've been studying plenum design and building one, and if I decide to go 9:1 CR or something, in the humble opinions of knowledgable people on this forum, will a plenumed ITB turbo setup show the benefits that it's worth? I could sell the whole setup for probably 1k, but I figure it'll at least be as good as a custom intake manifold, which would have a similar cost I figure. the setup has 45mm throttle bodies, and a plenum would be attached to my 50mm air horns. If I wanted to dial in more torque, I figure I could add velocity stacks into the runners, but I doubt I'll need to worry about it with a turbo. I would love to know the diameter of the runners on braineack's setup, for reference. Anyway, happy flaming! |
why flame? ITBs and a turbo is the best its gonna get
|
1.75" IIRC.
but of course adding a turbo to an otherwise stock motor will can net you well over 100% power gain easily :P |
Originally Posted by mazda/nissan
(Post 363356)
why flame? ITBs and a turbo is the best its gonna get
|
Originally Posted by viperormiata
(Post 363360)
seriously. It's a great idea and has been done on alot of different cars with respectable gains.
Sorry but English is a second language for me so it's twice as complicated to follow :) |
Depends. If you want top end, it's probably worth it. Stock intake manifold suckssssss. Building custom shit like that always ends up being a bitch though. But if you did it, it would be badass. Most here don't like IRRRRRRRTBS because people with them think they're gonna runs 12's in the 1/4 with their throttle response.
|
Originally Posted by Rafa
(Post 363374)
Fixed ;)
Sorry but English is a second language for me so it's twice as complicated to follow :) Feel free to correct me any time! lol |
I wouldn't want to deal with trying to tune it on my own car but if you got it to work well it would be bad ass.
|
If you can get it going consistently and reliably, it will be the shit.
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 363357)
1.75" IIRC.
but of course adding a turbo to an otherwise stock motor will can net you well over 100% power gain easily :P I'm gonna take my time with this setup, probably run regular ol' itbs while i'm breaking in the motor for a while, while I try to figure out how to do this in the baddest ass way possible, investigate runner sizing, ideal literage of plenum, etc. |
Originally Posted by N3v
(Post 363479)
awesome. 1.75" = 44.5mm, so it seems like ~45mm is the ideal torque/horsepower tradeoff range. What kind of gains did you see after switching out that manifold from stock?
I'm gonna take my time with this setup, probably run regular ol' itbs while i'm breaking in the motor for a while, while I try to figure out how to do this in the baddest ass way possible, investigate runner sizing, ideal literage of plenum, etc. |
Ok, maybe a silly question (ok, I know it's silly) but what is the benefit of IRTBs? Faster throttle response is one, but I never thought it was that sluggish to begin with...
|
Originally Posted by skidude108
(Post 363545)
Ok, maybe a silly question (ok, I know it's silly) but what is the benefit of IRTBs? Faster throttle response is one, but I never thought it was that sluggish to begin with...
|
The only difficulty I know of is tuning on vac side. The four tb plates will confuse the vacuum signal to the ecu's map sensor. Instead of a single tb vac of about 20 inches, you are going to find about 10 to 12 inches. Combining the four signals into a damper can might raise that to 13/14.
The consequence is that you must tune the entire span of vac side operation over 12 to 14 inches instead of 20, thus making the incremental changes more coarse and clearly needing a finer calibration. This is tough on the guys that must have a magic system run perfectly right out of the box. You are on the right track, it is worth doing. |
maybe, run the whole thing using a MAF sensor....
|
Originally Posted by Corky Bell
(Post 363560)
The only difficulty I know of is tuning on vac side. The four tb plates will confuse the vacuum signal to the ecu's map sensor. Instead of a single tb vac of about 20 inches, you are going to find about 10 to 12 inches. Combining the four signals into a damper can might raise that to 13/14.
The consequence is that you must tune the entire span of vac side operation over 12 to 14 inches instead of 20, thus making the incremental changes more coarse and clearly needing a finer calibration. This is tough on the guys that must have a magic system run perfectly right out of the box. You are on the right track, it is worth doing. |
sounds like an interesting project with badass potential. make sure you take lots of pics:)
|
Can be done successfully, search JeremyS on the pointy board.
His homepage His top speed run, I don't know what he was running at the time though. MX-5 Miata Forum - View Single Post - Fastest Miata? ITB's are on my long term projects list. Chris |
Why not go quad turbo with each fed into an individual throttle body...
Best of all worlds.. no lag and awesome throttle response |
4 tiny turbos would take just as long as one turbo 4 times as big ... well actually i think it would be worse due to the way the exhaust pulses would be hitting the turbines. Think about it, instead of 1800cc to power a turbo, now for each you have 450cc.
whatever, you were just joking anyway, and i ruined it lol. |
|
Originally Posted by akaryrye
(Post 363644)
4 tiny turbos would take just as long as one turbo 4 times as big ... well actually i think it would be worse due to the way the exhaust pulses would be hitting the turbines. Think about it, instead of 1800cc to power a turbo, now for each you have 450cc.
whatever, you were just joking anyway, and i ruined it lol. |
i was thinking about doing twin turbos just for the awesome factor, where each one is on it's own system and is fed into two ITB runners. seems expensive, and twice as many points of failure. But it sure would be one engine bay packed to the gills with awesome.
|
just dont forget a balance tube.
|
Originally Posted by N3v
(Post 363803)
i was thinking about doing twin turbos just for the awesome factor, where each one is on it's own system and is fed into two ITB runners. seems expensive, and twice as many points of failure. But it sure would be one engine bay packed to the gills with awesome.
|
Tune the spark and fuel maps using a Mustang 5.0 MAF sensor. The calibration values are already available in megasquirt. I am unsure of how you would do boost control and other MAP based functions without a MAP sensor though.
|
Originally Posted by The_Pipefather
(Post 363913)
Tune the spark and fuel maps using a Mustang 5.0 MAF sensor. The calibration values are already available in megasquirt. I am unsure of how you would do boost control and other MAP based functions without a MAP sensor though.
Isnt that what its for? |
I didnt know u were planning to run a turbo itb setup or was this a recent thought?
ill be there whenever i can to snap pics! actually need to post up the pics i havd of ur setup when i get home. |
Originally Posted by Saml01
(Post 363935)
Hybrid Alpha N?
Isnt that what its for? BTW not a single OEM uses speed-density these days. |
Originally Posted by flier129
(Post 363940)
I didnt know u were planning to run a turbo itb setup or was this a recent thought?
ill be there whenever i can to snap pics! actually need to post up the pics i havd of ur setup when i get home. I'm gonna toy around with the idea of using a mustang 5.0 MAF in my setup, it would instantly make tuning a snap. I don't really trust my current IAT sensor anyway, which is installed into the #1 runner, literally an inch and a half from the engine head. |
Originally Posted by skidude108
(Post 363846)
What about a cross? the turbo hooked to cylinders 1,2 feed 3,4 and the turbo running off 3,4 feed 1,2... No idea if there would be any benefit, but it might add to the cool factor.
I just worry about unequal pressure, so a balance tube for the tow manifolds would make sure all cylinders see the same amount of boost. it's common in TT v6 and v8 setups. |
idle would suffer with hybrid alpha n. off boost would be in alpha n while on boost would be in speed density.
ideally, i would like to tune idle in speed density, above 85 kpa in alpha n (which is how i have my itb setup) and boost in speed density. it doesnt seem doable that way. so, maf might be the best option with "boost sensing" for timing retard during boost. |
Originally Posted by Miatamaniac92
(Post 363619)
Can be done successfully, search JeremyS on the pointy board.
His homepage His top speed run, I don't know what he was running at the time though. MX-5 Miata Forum - View Single Post - Fastest Miata? ITB's are on my long term projects list. Chris |
well, i don't really care, I already have the ITB's. I'll just do it for the cool factor. It might flow better because the pressure is being regulated right at the runners, and it might also have better response. I really don't know though. What is certain though, is that it'd be beastly. As long as it performs as well as an aftermarket manifold I'll be happy.
|
If you try the setup, please let us know how it comes along.
|
Don't be too disappointed if you find less gains than say, bumping the boost up by 2 psi, which is a lot easier to do.
|
Originally Posted by N3v
(Post 364518)
well, i don't really care, I already have the ITB's. I'll just do it for the cool factor. It might flow better because the pressure is being regulated right at the runners, and it might also have better response. I really don't know though. What is certain though, is that it'd be beastly. As long as it performs as well as an aftermarket manifold I'll be happy.
|
5 Attachment(s)
ITB whoring time!
Attachment 208382 Attachment 208383 Attachment 208384 Attachment 208385 Attachment 208386 |
lol what happened to your carbon fiber plate?
|
Originally Posted by flier129
(Post 365036)
ITB whoring time!
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands