Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. (https://www.miataturbo.net/)
-   DIY Turbo Discussion (https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo-discussion-14/)
-   -   ITBS + plenum + turbo = worthwhile gain? (https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo-discussion-14/itbs-plenum-turbo-%3D-worthwhile-gain-31135/)

N3v 02-04-2009 02:14 PM

ITBS + plenum + turbo = worthwhile gain?
 
alright, I've got another thread that might potentially fire up the flamethrowers, but here goes. The facts are, I'm putting together a forged internals bottom end, but I haven't got pistons yet. Got carillo A rods though.

Basically, I've been studying plenum design and building one, and if I decide to go 9:1 CR or something, in the humble opinions of knowledgable people on this forum, will a plenumed ITB turbo setup show the benefits that it's worth? I could sell the whole setup for probably 1k, but I figure it'll at least be as good as a custom intake manifold, which would have a similar cost I figure.

the setup has 45mm throttle bodies, and a plenum would be attached to my 50mm air horns. If I wanted to dial in more torque, I figure I could add velocity stacks into the runners, but I doubt I'll need to worry about it with a turbo.

I would love to know the diameter of the runners on braineack's setup, for reference. Anyway, happy flaming!

mazda/nissan 02-04-2009 03:57 PM

why flame? ITBs and a turbo is the best its gonna get

Braineack 02-04-2009 03:59 PM

1.75" IIRC.


but of course adding a turbo to an otherwise stock motor will can net you well over 100% power gain easily :P

viperormiata 02-04-2009 04:01 PM


Originally Posted by mazda/nissan (Post 363356)
why flame? ITBs and a turbo is the best its gonna get

seriously. It's a great idea and has been down on alot of different cars with respectable gains.

Rafa 02-04-2009 04:16 PM


Originally Posted by viperormiata (Post 363360)
seriously. It's a great idea and has been done on alot of different cars with respectable gains.

Fixed ;)

Sorry but English is a second language for me so it's twice as complicated to follow :)

patsmx5 02-04-2009 04:30 PM

Depends. If you want top end, it's probably worth it. Stock intake manifold suckssssss. Building custom shit like that always ends up being a bitch though. But if you did it, it would be badass. Most here don't like IRRRRRRRTBS because people with them think they're gonna runs 12's in the 1/4 with their throttle response.

viperormiata 02-04-2009 04:35 PM


Originally Posted by Rafa (Post 363374)
Fixed ;)

Sorry but English is a second language for me so it's twice as complicated to follow :)

haha, its cool man. I'm just using the little time I have in between classes to get my stuff done and not really thinking about my grammar because I keep it gang like that:cool:

Feel free to correct me any time! lol

johndoe 02-04-2009 04:38 PM

I wouldn't want to deal with trying to tune it on my own car but if you got it to work well it would be bad ass.

Saml01 02-04-2009 04:43 PM

If you can get it going consistently and reliably, it will be the shit.

N3v 02-04-2009 07:20 PM


Originally Posted by Braineack (Post 363357)
1.75" IIRC.


but of course adding a turbo to an otherwise stock motor will can net you well over 100% power gain easily :P

awesome. 1.75" = 44.5mm, so it seems like ~45mm is the ideal torque/horsepower tradeoff range. What kind of gains did you see after switching out that manifold from stock?

I'm gonna take my time with this setup, probably run regular ol' itbs while i'm breaking in the motor for a while, while I try to figure out how to do this in the baddest ass way possible, investigate runner sizing, ideal literage of plenum, etc.

Rafa 02-04-2009 07:52 PM


Originally Posted by N3v (Post 363479)
awesome. 1.75" = 44.5mm, so it seems like ~45mm is the ideal torque/horsepower tradeoff range. What kind of gains did you see after switching out that manifold from stock?

I'm gonna take my time with this setup, probably run regular ol' itbs while i'm breaking in the motor for a while, while I try to figure out how to do this in the baddest ass way possible, investigate runner sizing, ideal literage of plenum, etc.

Please keep us updated on your progress! :bigtu:

skidude 02-04-2009 09:58 PM

Ok, maybe a silly question (ok, I know it's silly) but what is the benefit of IRTBs? Faster throttle response is one, but I never thought it was that sluggish to begin with...

mazda/nissan 02-04-2009 10:02 PM


Originally Posted by skidude108 (Post 363545)
Ok, maybe a silly question (ok, I know it's silly) but what is the benefit of IRTBs? Faster throttle response is one, but I never thought it was that sluggish to begin with...

I dunno, all I know is high end cars use them and they look cool and are technically nifty so why not :) (only on FI cars though)

Corky Bell 02-04-2009 10:17 PM

The only difficulty I know of is tuning on vac side. The four tb plates will confuse the vacuum signal to the ecu's map sensor. Instead of a single tb vac of about 20 inches, you are going to find about 10 to 12 inches. Combining the four signals into a damper can might raise that to 13/14.

The consequence is that you must tune the entire span of vac side operation over 12 to 14 inches instead of 20, thus making the incremental changes more coarse and clearly needing a finer calibration.

This is tough on the guys that must have a magic system run perfectly right out of the box.

You are on the right track, it is worth doing.

RdSnake 02-04-2009 10:46 PM

maybe, run the whole thing using a MAF sensor....

N3v 02-04-2009 11:26 PM


Originally Posted by Corky Bell (Post 363560)
The only difficulty I know of is tuning on vac side. The four tb plates will confuse the vacuum signal to the ecu's map sensor. Instead of a single tb vac of about 20 inches, you are going to find about 10 to 12 inches. Combining the four signals into a damper can might raise that to 13/14.

The consequence is that you must tune the entire span of vac side operation over 12 to 14 inches instead of 20, thus making the incremental changes more coarse and clearly needing a finer calibration.

This is tough on the guys that must have a magic system run perfectly right out of the box.

You are on the right track, it is worth doing.

The difficulties you're talking about are also present with NA IRTBs, but I figured it'd be easier to tune on a 'closed' system, where the ITB's aren't just sucking whatever is on the end of the runners (small atmospheric pressure or temp changes) I dunno though, I guess I'll figure it out as I go along.

18psi 02-05-2009 12:33 AM

sounds like an interesting project with badass potential. make sure you take lots of pics:)

Miatamaniac92 02-05-2009 12:42 AM

Can be done successfully, search JeremyS on the pointy board.
His homepage

His top speed run, I don't know what he was running at the time though.
MX-5 Miata Forum - View Single Post - Fastest Miata?

ITB's are on my long term projects list.


Chris

nicacus 02-05-2009 02:03 AM

Why not go quad turbo with each fed into an individual throttle body...
Best of all worlds.. no lag and awesome throttle response

akaryrye 02-05-2009 02:35 AM

4 tiny turbos would take just as long as one turbo 4 times as big ... well actually i think it would be worse due to the way the exhaust pulses would be hitting the turbines. Think about it, instead of 1800cc to power a turbo, now for each you have 450cc.


whatever, you were just joking anyway, and i ruined it lol.

mazda/nissan 02-05-2009 06:34 AM

My Home Page

I find myself posting this site yet again :)

(not my homepage btw)

nicacus 02-05-2009 10:19 AM


Originally Posted by akaryrye (Post 363644)
4 tiny turbos would take just as long as one turbo 4 times as big ... well actually i think it would be worse due to the way the exhaust pulses would be hitting the turbines. Think about it, instead of 1800cc to power a turbo, now for each you have 450cc.


whatever, you were just joking anyway, and i ruined it lol.

Dude if the Veyron can do it a Miata can do it better

N3v 02-05-2009 12:34 PM

i was thinking about doing twin turbos just for the awesome factor, where each one is on it's own system and is fed into two ITB runners. seems expensive, and twice as many points of failure. But it sure would be one engine bay packed to the gills with awesome.

Braineack 02-05-2009 12:38 PM

just dont forget a balance tube.

skidude 02-05-2009 02:07 PM


Originally Posted by N3v (Post 363803)
i was thinking about doing twin turbos just for the awesome factor, where each one is on it's own system and is fed into two ITB runners. seems expensive, and twice as many points of failure. But it sure would be one engine bay packed to the gills with awesome.

What about a cross? the turbo hooked to cylinders 1,2 feed 3,4 and the turbo running off 3,4 feed 1,2... No idea if there would be any benefit, but it might add to the cool factor.

The_Pipefather 02-05-2009 04:07 PM

Tune the spark and fuel maps using a Mustang 5.0 MAF sensor. The calibration values are already available in megasquirt. I am unsure of how you would do boost control and other MAP based functions without a MAP sensor though.

Saml01 02-05-2009 04:35 PM


Originally Posted by The_Pipefather (Post 363913)
Tune the spark and fuel maps using a Mustang 5.0 MAF sensor. The calibration values are already available in megasquirt. I am unsure of how you would do boost control and other MAP based functions without a MAP sensor though.

Hybrid Alpha N?

Isnt that what its for?

flier129 02-05-2009 04:41 PM

I didnt know u were planning to run a turbo itb setup or was this a recent thought?

ill be there whenever i can to snap pics! actually need to post up the pics i havd of ur setup when i get home.

The_Pipefather 02-05-2009 04:42 PM


Originally Posted by Saml01 (Post 363935)
Hybrid Alpha N?

Isnt that what its for?

MAF is a way more elegant and reliable way of doing it. You have a single air inlet on a turbo car anyway, might as well use it to measure airflow directly.

BTW not a single OEM uses speed-density these days.

N3v 02-05-2009 05:28 PM


Originally Posted by flier129 (Post 363940)
I didnt know u were planning to run a turbo itb setup or was this a recent thought?

ill be there whenever i can to snap pics! actually need to post up the pics i havd of ur setup when i get home.

I'm always playing around with ideas. last week I was thinking high compression and nitrous, which would work and get me all the power i'd want on the street, then well into turbo power on the track, but turbos are just really damn fun, and an itb turbo setup would be monstrous. I don't have anything here at school besides my car and its current setup. I need to gather parts for my engine build though, cause I'm getting paranoid about the condition of my current shit. I need a job like yesterday.

I'm gonna toy around with the idea of using a mustang 5.0 MAF in my setup, it would instantly make tuning a snap. I don't really trust my current IAT sensor anyway, which is installed into the #1 runner, literally an inch and a half from the engine head.

Braineack 02-05-2009 06:03 PM


Originally Posted by skidude108 (Post 363846)
What about a cross? the turbo hooked to cylinders 1,2 feed 3,4 and the turbo running off 3,4 feed 1,2... No idea if there would be any benefit, but it might add to the cool factor.


I just worry about unequal pressure, so a balance tube for the tow manifolds would make sure all cylinders see the same amount of boost. it's common in TT v6 and v8 setups.

RdSnake 02-05-2009 07:52 PM

idle would suffer with hybrid alpha n. off boost would be in alpha n while on boost would be in speed density.
ideally, i would like to tune idle in speed density, above 85 kpa in alpha n (which is how i have my itb setup) and boost in speed density. it doesnt seem doable that way. so, maf might be the best option with "boost sensing" for timing retard during boost.

Midtenn 02-05-2009 09:20 PM


Originally Posted by Miatamaniac92 (Post 363619)
Can be done successfully, search JeremyS on the pointy board.
His homepage

His top speed run, I don't know what he was running at the time though.
MX-5 Miata Forum - View Single Post - Fastest Miata?

ITB's are on my long term projects list.


Chris

I talked with Jeremy about his setup sometime ago and he basically told me the complexity of the system wasn't worth the gains. All in all a well designed single TB setup would do just as well. Plus with a turbo, you really don't hear the ITB's. :)

N3v 02-06-2009 03:59 PM

well, i don't really care, I already have the ITB's. I'll just do it for the cool factor. It might flow better because the pressure is being regulated right at the runners, and it might also have better response. I really don't know though. What is certain though, is that it'd be beastly. As long as it performs as well as an aftermarket manifold I'll be happy.

93mimi 02-06-2009 04:13 PM

If you try the setup, please let us know how it comes along.

The_Pipefather 02-06-2009 04:26 PM

Don't be too disappointed if you find less gains than say, bumping the boost up by 2 psi, which is a lot easier to do.

Midtenn 02-07-2009 10:46 AM


Originally Posted by N3v (Post 364518)
well, i don't really care, I already have the ITB's. I'll just do it for the cool factor. It might flow better because the pressure is being regulated right at the runners, and it might also have better response. I really don't know though. What is certain though, is that it'd be beastly. As long as it performs as well as an aftermarket manifold I'll be happy.

Well that was kind of how Jeremy came to it. He purchased a former CSP car that had the ITB's and a bunch of other parts. Took what he needed, so other parts to friends, and then sold the car itself (making money in the end).

flier129 02-07-2009 07:27 PM

5 Attachment(s)
ITB whoring time!

Attachment 208382
Attachment 208383
Attachment 208384
Attachment 208385
Attachment 208386

mazda/nissan 02-07-2009 08:33 PM

lol what happened to your carbon fiber plate?

musanovic 02-07-2009 11:49 PM


Originally Posted by flier129 (Post 365036)
ITB whoring time!

all this car needs is a turbo now


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands