DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

My downpipe (because no one looks at my other thread)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2008, 12:11 AM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
cjernigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
Default My downpipe (because no one looks at my other thread)

So as my first tig project for the car I decided to build my own downpipe. I had planned to use all stainless tubing but ran out. The two sections of tubing on the flex section are aluminized.

Don't mind the large haze sections on the stainless or the convexity of some welds. No I didn't backpurge and yes my fitment between tubes wasn't exactly perfect. Thus a couple places of burn through that had to be dealt with.

I have pretty much learned every lesson I can think of concerning this kind of tubing fabrication that comes to tig welding fitment, bolted down flanges, marking your **** correctly and w/e you can think of I did it or thought about doing it before catching myself. So it was a wild ride and i'm glad to be done with it.

The tubing is all from racing solutions columbia river mandrel bendings and so are the flanges. Flex, bungs, and 2-3" transition is from verocious.
I used 2.25" tubing off the flange and transitioned to 3" as you can see with the WG dumping back in after the transition.








cjernigan is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 12:32 AM
  #2  
Junior Member
iTrader: (14)
 
jtpaintballwdp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Aldie, VA
Posts: 280
Total Cats: 0
Default

looks pretty damn good
jtpaintballwdp is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 01:05 AM
  #3  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Dark Wanderer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Québec, Canada
Posts: 403
Total Cats: -1
Default

What's the use for the 3 npt ring? Wideband and?
Dark Wanderer is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 01:07 AM
  #4  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
cjernigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
Default

Stock narrowband to keep CEL's away.
Wideband at 12 o-clock because its runs through the shifter hole.
Dyno wideband just in case I want to thread one in precat instead of post cat in the tailpipe.
cjernigan is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 01:59 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
airbrush1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Baltimore Maryland
Posts: 1,038
Total Cats: 9
Default

Looks good for your first TIG job, only thing I can see being an issue is how the WG tube connects at a rather sharp angle and very close to the turbine exit. Might not be optimal for flow.
airbrush1 is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 05:09 AM
  #6  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (9)
 
crashnscar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 929
Total Cats: 9
Default

so now the million dollar question..... does it fit?

begi
crashnscar is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 06:23 AM
  #7  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
cjernigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
Default

I need to widen one of the holes in the turbo flange a little otherwise it fits fine. I'll post pictures of fitment when i get time to finish the install.
cjernigan is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 08:56 AM
  #8  
I'm Miserable!
iTrader: (1)
 
SloS13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 853
Total Cats: 1
Default

very nice job.
SloS13 is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 08:57 AM
  #9  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,485
Total Cats: 372
Default

Looks good to me. WG reentry at the expansion seems logical. I went with 3 o2 bungs also - and just plugged the dyno port. Did you consider drill n tap for egt on the mani before install. You can always plug and use later.
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:05 AM
  #10  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
TurboTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,892
Total Cats: 399
Default

I'm glad you did the TIG work yourself. Keep practicing, it'll be worth it!
TurboTim is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:24 AM
  #11  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
zarish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 219
Total Cats: 0
Default

Looks pretty good man. Good Job!!
zarish is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:27 AM
  #12  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,485
Total Cats: 372
Default for discussion sake

Still thinking about the reentry of the wg tube and wondering what's ideal. It makes sense that reentry at the expansion would work since the main flow of exhaust is expanding at that point, but on the flip side is it creating more disturbance in the flow because it's entering during this expansion? What's ideal? Would a greater angle be more desirable? That would create a larger entry port - and in the image below would also enhance the reentry (at the price of a tighter exit from the wg) since the wg pipe is transitioning at the same angle as the dp. I realize that space plays a part- and a side mount will have less room. But I've got a top mount and plan to add an ewg port at some point. Comments from the experts?

m2cupcar is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:33 AM
  #13  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

since he's doing it just out of the transition into 3" i think it's a good spot. I doubt you'd notice any difference between the two spots above. anything is better than my T3.
Braineack is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:35 AM
  #14  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Atlanta93LE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 2,195
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by m2cupcar
Comments from the experts?
Originally Posted by Braineack
since he's doing it just out of the transition into 3" i think it's a good spot.
Brain, he said experts.
Atlanta93LE is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:38 AM
  #15  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

oh yeah. duh
Braineack is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:15 AM
  #16  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

the experts say it's 100x harder to make the wg line that long and still have it fit... at least when your WG is on top of the manifold. chad has no excuse.
y8s is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:36 AM
  #17  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,485
Total Cats: 372
Default

Originally Posted by y8s
...at least when your WG is on top of the manifold...
what about the number 4 runner? Chad's last wg pipe was about 10x longer, but that came from the rear of the turbine housing so it was easy.
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:41 AM
  #18  
y8s
2 Props,3 Dildos,& 1 Cat
iTrader: (8)
 
y8s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fake Virginia
Posts: 19,338
Total Cats: 573
Default

it's just too damn tight in there to snack two pipes. i'm a rookie here!
y8s is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 11:49 AM
  #19  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
m2cupcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,485
Total Cats: 372
Default

I suppose the DPs that do have a merge that far down are utilizing the additional space created by the smaller 2.5" dp diameter
m2cupcar is offline  
Old 05-12-2008, 11:52 AM
  #20  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Saml01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 5,710
Total Cats: 3
Default

How about sending the WG dump back into the intake for some DEI action?
Saml01 is offline  


Quick Reply: My downpipe (because no one looks at my other thread)



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:54 AM.