(Quick Fab) China Manifold Replacement
26 Attachment(s)
Despite all the warnings I, like so many others, purchased a chinafold.
I need to learn the hard way, that's just how I am. So i finally I got tired of the mess I was creating under my hood with failed reinforcement attempts. This was the last straw. I've been meaning to place an order with Stahl for some mandrel pieces and the flanges, for a proper header build, but I've been procrasterbating allot lately. So on my day off, armed with my welder, some 2" aluminized pipe, and a crush bender, i started to craft my own. I started by making a jig: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378258972 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378258972 my plan was to reuse the flanges: (cut and cleaned them up a bit) https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378258972 I was weary about using the flanges with the mild steel. I figured that would be my weak point. The bender limited me to a 6" radius bend( to wide for a manifold). My solution was to bend the pieces, cut the radius's short, then swell the ends to maintain a constant radius of about 2". By all means this is not the right way to do this, this is just a temporary solution brought on by weeks of frustration. My original plan was to create a log manifold but i got carried away. https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378258972 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378258972 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378258972 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378258972 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378258972 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378258972 Like i said earlier this is not correct way to fabricate a manifold. I took no consideration for the runner length. I just made sure the collector wasn't creating a mess of turbulence between 1 and 4. After it was welded together i was able to port the flanges quite a bit to accommodate the larger runners. Comparing the 2 manifolds: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378258972 My welds started to get sloppy towards the end. It was pushing midnight and I was getting tired. installed: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378258972 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378258972 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378258972 I header wrapped it shortly after this photo. All in all it was a fun experience, and I now have a nice jig to work with when the real parts get here. So far Its been almost 1k miles and no cracks. Which is better than the chinafold did. The tone of the exhaust is much different than before. Most likely because of the size and unequal length of the runners. Its much deeper now and has a subaru boxer rumble at 4k rpm and up. Very unique in my opinion. I will be taking it to the drag strip tomorrow night to see how my time will be effected by this new custom addition. p.s. Power seems just as good, if not better than before, but its hard to say since its been a hot couple of days. Hope this was a somewhat interesting read for everyone. |
1 Attachment(s)
|
you could have made the collector shorter to give the runners a little more radius and a straighter shot to the turbo but its better than some of the other manifolds ive seen here.
|
Originally Posted by ThunderKunt
(Post 1050075)
its better than some of the other manifolds ive seen here.
|
...Wow..
Dann |
Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
(Post 1050484)
Really? Show me one.
And that's by no means dissing you OP. Good job with building something for yourself. With probably $10 in material there, it is good practice for when the nice good stuff comes. Which i hope turns out nothing like this. haha |
I give you props for doing it, but I wish you tried a little harder.
|
Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
(Post 1050484)
Originally Posted by ThunderKunt
(Post 1050075)
its better than some of the other manifolds ive seen here.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...icture011-jpeg |
I'd prefer that one.
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1050509)
I'd prefer that one.
|
Lol! I'm waiting for "nothing is good enough for you guys". I can't wait to post pics of my new setup so I can get props for trying, but critized at the same time.
Props on making that jig. What type of welder did you use? Obviously it was mig, but I mean, was it a small 110v unit? |
Given the nature of the project being a quick temporary fix I thought it was a success. Definitely an entertaining read with the funny pictures. I feel like if I actually tried with my current fabrication abilities I would end up with a product similar to or worse in quality especially if I did it all in one day.
|
Originally Posted by cyotani
(Post 1050512)
why? the 1 and 4 runners are perpendicular to the turbo inlet and inline with eachother. While not pretty, at least the OP doesn't have exhaust gases flow opposing each other
But if that's your argument for what makes one better than the other, I suggest you look closely at OP's #1 and #4 as well. |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1050519)
they aren't flowing "into" each other; they won't collide like atoms and explode. #1 and #4 don't fire at the same time so it doesn't even matter.
But if that's your argument for what makes one better than the other, I suggest you look closely at OP's #1 and #4 as well. edit: OP's isn't much better but that second manfold almost looks like it directs the exhaust gas away from the turbo. The OP's is at least partially angled toward the turbo |
true: I had a log manifold once, the turbo wouldn't spool; the exhaust clogged the outlet like I clog my toilet.
|
Originally Posted by cyotani
(Post 1050520)
tyou'll get very inefficient turbulent flow at the collector
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1050521)
true: I had a log manifold once, the turbo wouldn't spool; the exhaust clogged the outlet like I clog my toilet.
Clearly the clog is key to peak power. |
I'm going to be in OC next week. has i can the old manifold?
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1050521)
true: I had a log manifold once, the turbo wouldn't spool; the exhaust clogged the outlet like I clog my toilet.
but still: log mani < random manifold < OP manifold < all other well designed manifolds? Also last time I had toilet clogging problems my land lord told me to keep a tree branch in the bathroom and poke at the stool till it goes down (true story). |
Well there's your problem. Stop putting your stool in the toilet.
|
I completely disagree with you cyotani.
Dann |
Originally Posted by nitrodann
(Post 1050544)
I completely disagree with you cyotani.
Dann I never said I was right, just trying to have an intellectual conversion about manifolds. that greater than statment was a question if you haven't noticed... |
I answered :)
Dann |
So i'm curious why go with such oversized pipes?
Btw wb Dann |
Originally Posted by nitrodann
(Post 1050550)
I answered :)
Dann |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1050519)
they aren't flowing "into" each other; they won't collide like atoms and explode. #1 and #4 don't fire at the same time so it doesn't even matter.
But if that's your argument for what makes one better than the other, I suggest you look closely at OP's #1 and #4 as well. |
Thanks 888a, I actually have no idea why I was banned, but its MT, you get that.
The issue is the wall thickness of the pipes and the amount of weld protruding inside these pipes, and the fact that it has a much higher surface area. So in essence, its larger and lets more heat escape lowering efficiency by lowering enthalpy, and I doubt it flows as nice as the smooth insides of the basic log manifold. Dann |
Anything here flows better than the steampipe log with the outlet hole cut in it. Hell, a cast log flows better than the steampipe logs because there is some attempt at directing the outlet gasses.
|
I'm not sure if you are refuting what I'm saying because you genuinely considered it and think something different or if you are just being facetious.
Dann |
Originally Posted by nitrodann
(Post 1050576)
I'm not sure if you are refuting what I'm saying because you genuinely considered it and think something different or if you are just being facetious.
Dann Whoa. Shit. Cool it with the big words. I don't know what they mean so i'm forced to take offense at them. |
so then?
|
Originally Posted by nitrodann
(Post 1050559)
The issue is the wall thickness of the pipes and the amount of weld protruding inside these pipes, and the fact that it has a much higher surface area.
So in essence, its larger and lets more heat escape lowering efficiency by lowering enthalpy, and I doubt it flows as nice as the smooth insides of the basic log manifold. Dann got it, I was more just considering flow pathway. |
1 Attachment(s)
Typically i don't post things I've created for the first time, but I felt happy with the outcome.
I gained quite a bit of knowledge just making this "diaper" of a manifold. When I order the pieces for the new manifold more time and effort will be placed into it. Plus I now have a jig and that was the most important part, now I can take my time with the new one. It does look like a diaper now: or the scarecrows head from the batman cartoons: https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1378423474
Originally Posted by triple88a
(Post 1050552)
So i'm curious why go with such oversized pipes?
Btw wb Dann I'm not sure why I decided to go with 2" pipe, originally I was planning on 1.75" but I just kept bending the 2".
Originally Posted by thirdgen
(Post 1050514)
Lol! I'm waiting for "nothing is good enough for you guys". I can't wait to post pics of my new setup so I can get props for trying, but critized at the same time.
Props on making that jig. What type of welder did you use? Obviously it was mig, but I mean, was it a small 110v unit?
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1050526)
I'm going to be in OC next week. has i can the old manifold?
Just let me know when your in town and you can swing by the shop to get it. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:41 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands