Originally Posted by Faeflora
(Post 684773)
Ahh Tim, so is that the twinscroll mani you said you would CAD out for me? ;)
Are all the runners actually equal length? Looks like some are not :ohnoes:
Originally Posted by Faeflora
(Post 684775)
Oh and for non twinscroll, #3 is pretty sick and my favorite other than twinscroll but it looks like it comes off the head a decent distance. looks like the turbo would hit the subframe?
|
What runner length are you aiming for with the designs?
What I'd be looking for is equal length above all else, and the longest runners that can package. Edit: And... looking for AC compatability. No PS though. Hard mode! |
Equal length + long runner + A/C = essentially impossible.
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 684803)
Equal length + long runner + A/C = essentially impossible.
|
A/C P/S? Bla. With enough time...
TS silly! http://www.inoneear.com/outtheother/...0collector.jpg Time for bed. |
No, no need for P/S.
|
AC and PS and long tubes!?
http://gallery.y8s.com/d/22198-2/waterlines03.jpg shit son, I been doin that so long it's been discontinued. (dont think they are equal length tho) |
Yeah.... that's... not what I'm looking for. x.x
|
Originally Posted by y8s
(Post 684812)
AC and PS and long tubes!?
shit son, I been doin that so long it's been discontinued. (dont think they are equal length tho) |
1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 191255
If the last tubes had a nice U in them and the turbo was sitting lower and futher back, I could see a longer tube header working fine with AC. Certainly not in the low mount spot of the Absurdflow setup, but doable. It's a greddy, and obviously not perfect, but just as an idea. Moved a bit further down and further forward, actually... lots forward without PS would be possible. |
Fluid dynamics favors a design with the fewest bends from a drag and loss of impulse energy standpoint. You want very few 90s and no 180s if you want to maximize the effect of energy pulses on the turbine and not slamming into a corner and being dissipated as heat or rebounding. I don't have access to the fluid dynamics programs that some of you were using for intake manifold design, but many of the same principles are applicable. I recall that each 90 creates as much drag as 20 feet of straight pipe of the same diameter. If you must bend, use wide sweeping arcs.
|
you could just make an absurdflow absurd mount and put the collector above the left front wheel
|
Originally Posted by sixshooter
(Post 684941)
Fluid dynamics favors a design with the fewest bends from a drag and loss of impulse energy standpoint. You want very few 90s and no 180s if you want to maximize the effect of energy pulses on the turbine and not slamming into a corner and being dissipated as heat or rebounding. I don't have access to the fluid dynamics programs that some of you were using for intake manifold design, but many of the same principles are applicable. I recall that each 90 creates as much drag as 20 feet of straight pipe of the same diameter. If you must bend, use wide sweeping arcs.
http://www.absurdflow.com/miata/stan...absurdflow.jpg
Originally Posted by y8s
(Post 684951)
you could just make an absurdflow absurd mount and put the collector above the left front wheel
|
5 Attachment(s)
Here is whats on my car.
1-1/4” schedule 40 pipe from head flange to turbo flange the equal lenght runners are 16.6” long Note the Dyno-plot. Heavy on low and mid rage torque spools a GT3071R quickly not a top end only shape at all. Definately not AC/PS compatable. Bob |
Very nice! It is weird that when I look at your .jpg's I instinctively try to rotate them to get a different view? haha. What software was that modeled in?
|
Originally Posted by TurboTim
(Post 684987)
Very nice! It is weird that when I look at your .jpg's I instinctively try to rotate them to get a different view? haha. What software was that modeled in?
Things to note the turbo is shifted forward and is mounted very low. If it was centered between the 4 runners the outlet of the compressor would be pointing right at the steering shaft U-joint and wouldnt fit well. Bob |
What size A/R on the 3017 bbundy and who made the manifold?
Also Tim could you possibly replicate that thing. That low end torque is godly. Beat my t2554 by a metric shitton. |
Originally Posted by shuiend
(Post 684997)
What size A/R on the 3017 bbundy and who made the manifold?
Also Tim could you possibly replicate that thing. That low in torque is godly. Beat my t2554 by a metric shitton. -Wheel: 56.5mm w/ 84 trim -Housing: 0.64 a/r Compressor -Wheel: 71mm w/ 56 trim -Housing: .50 a/r Internally wastegated. I made the manifold myself. It’s lasted almost a year without messing with it now that I switched to Inconel studs. I made it before there were V-bands available. Bob |
Originally Posted by shuiend
(Post 684997)
What size A/R on the 3017 bbundy and who made the manifold?
Also Tim could you possibly replicate that thing. That low end torque is godly. Beat my t2554 by a metric shitton. |
Originally Posted by Faeflora
(Post 685046)
Note that his engine is a stroker. Kinda like comparing apples to apples dipped in cocaine.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands