Notices
DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

Turbo manifold styles- Absurdflow lowmount vs ramhorn, which for maximum power?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 01:16 AM
  #81  
ARTech's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 526
Total Cats: 10
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by sixshooter
Fluid dynamics favors a design with the fewest bends from a drag and loss of impulse energy standpoint. You want very few 90s and no 180s if you want to maximize the effect of energy pulses on the turbine and not slamming into a corner and being dissipated as heat or rebounding. I don't have access to the fluid dynamics programs that some of you were using for intake manifold design, but many of the same principles are applicable. I recall that each 90 creates as much drag as 20 feet of straight pipe of the same diameter. If you must bend, use wide sweeping arcs.
You're ignoring one very important factor, merge angle. That is the reason a ramhorn outperforms other designs. It's the only manifold design I've made so far that pulls a vacumm (exhaust scavenging) on the non firing runners. Any other manifold does the opposite. Packaging, makes it impossible to make a low merge angle manifold without introducing bends, many of them, so for best flow, low merge angle is more important than the amount of bends. And as mentioned earlier in the thread, just take a look as some of the top performing engines in any type of racing. They can't all be wrong.

As far as spool, shorter runners=faster spool. Full race, with their extensive experience in manifold building, agrees, even though saying otherwise would help their sales. They have no reason to lie. Sorry Bob, but I think you're wrong on that one. There may be other factors contributing to your fast spool, if it is indeed faster with the same displacement.

A low angle merge manifold with the shortest possible runners is the ticket. Tim, your designs look awesome. Have you started working on one yet?
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 01:39 AM
  #82  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by ARTech
A low angle merge manifold with the shortest possible runners is the ticket. Tim, your designs look awesome. Have you started working on one yet?
Hopefully Tim starts working on one for me sometime at the beginning on March.
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 08:46 AM
  #83  
Faeflora's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

So. Will your car be ready for spring dyno day?
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 10:52 AM
  #84  
TurboTim's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,033
Total Cats: 425
From: Chesterfield, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by ARTech
Tim, your designs look awesome. Have you started working on one yet?
Thanks buddy. Besides the cleaned up CAD models I haven't done anything more.
Old Feb 5, 2011 | 11:58 AM
  #85  
shuiend's Avatar
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 15,235
Total Cats: 1,700
From: Charleston SC
Default

Originally Posted by Faeflora
So. Will your car be ready for spring dyno day?
Only if yours is.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AnotherDamnMiata
DIY Turbo Discussion
26
Nov 19, 2015 11:34 PM
Andifer
Miata parts for sale/trade
8
Sep 23, 2015 05:43 PM
tottestad
WTB
0
Sep 22, 2015 08:07 AM
tottestad
Miata parts for sale/trade
18
Sep 14, 2015 07:52 PM
AnotherDamnMiata
WTB
13
Sep 11, 2015 10:56 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:52 AM.