DIY Turbo Discussion greddy on a 1.8? homebrew kit?

GT2871 AR .86 for 1.6. Keep or return?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2016, 12:48 AM
  #1  
Del
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Del's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 11
Total Cats: 2
Default GT2871 AR .86 for 1.6. Keep or return?

I got a good deal on a China GT2871 with a .64 AR hot side for my 1.6. Unfortunately when I got the new turbo, it had a .86 AR hot side instead of the .64 AR it was listed as. The turbo is on the big side for my 1.6. Do you guys think I should try to return the .86 AR for a .64 AR or try it out. My current setup is a T28, megasquirt, and injectors. Runs good. Looking to upsize my turbo but not have massive turbo lag. Not my daily driver.

Thanks,

Del
Del is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 01:06 AM
  #2  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

It will not spool well in the slightest.
Savington is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 01:21 AM
  #3  
Del
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Del's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 11
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Savington
It will not spool well in the slightest.
That's what I was thinking. I may be able to send it back and get a GT2860 .64 AR instead. Think that it would spool okay with my 1.6?

The turbo I have now has a .86 AR hot side and a .42 AR cold side. Not sure of the wheel sizes. Feels a little laggy but doesn't run out of boost.
Del is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 03:32 AM
  #4  
Newb
 
Wade5k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
Posts: 15
Total Cats: -3
Default

Would you be interested in a Twisted motion gt2871 with better specs?
Wade5k is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -2 Leave a negcat
Old 05-26-2016, 09:14 AM
  #5  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by Wade5k
Would you be interested in a Twisted motion gt2871 with better specs?
this is not a want to buy thread
and your 2871 is not any better
at all

Last edited by 18psi; 05-26-2016 at 10:12 AM.
18psi is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 10:09 AM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (6)
 
ryansmoneypit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: A cave in Va
Posts: 3,395
Total Cats: 456
Default

You need a 2560.
ryansmoneypit is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 10:13 AM
  #7  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

I guess it depends on his definition of "lag".
but I'd agree with Ryan that anything past a 2560 on a 1.6 is going to be laggy

chinachargers especially so since they tend to come on really lazy
18psi is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 10:18 AM
  #8  
Newb
 
Wade5k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
Posts: 15
Total Cats: -3
Default

Noted. And why so serious? But in theory shouldn't it be since it has the AR number he was looking for?
Originally Posted by 18psi
this is not a want to buy thread
and your [crappy] 2871 is not any better
at all
Wade5k is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 10:23 AM
  #9  
mkturbo.com
iTrader: (24)
 
shuiend's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 15,176
Total Cats: 1,680
Default

Because a 2871 on a 1.6 is a stupid idea and will spool horribly. No AR will fix that.
shuiend is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 10:26 AM
  #10  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Not that serious, just don't like opening the "new threads" to see you offering your stuff to everyone and their mother.

As for the last part: it might be a teensy bit quicker to spool than his current one, but likely won't make any difference at all since that's not his main problem. Like Lars said
18psi is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 11:04 AM
  #11  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by shuiend
Because a 2871 on a 1.6 is a stupid idea and will spool horribly. No AR will fix that.
This is the correct answer
Savington is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 11:04 AM
  #12  
Newb
 
Wade5k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Midwest City, Oklahoma
Posts: 15
Total Cats: -3
Default

Sorry about that lol I changed my setup up and realized I'm sitting on quite a few extra parts. And wandered out of the WTB section when exploring the forum.

And I agree with you guys on going with the smaller turbo I thought I wanted bigger power then the GT2554 gave me but 2 months into the 2871 and Im learning power definately is nice but spool was more important to me. Just didn't know what OPs goal with the car was
Originally Posted by 18psi
Not that serious, just don't like opening the "new threads" to see you offering your stuff to everyone and their mother.

As for the last part: it might be a teensy bit quicker to spool than his current one, but likely won't make any difference at all since that's not his main problem. Like Lars said
Wade5k is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 01:58 PM
  #13  
Del
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Del's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 11
Total Cats: 2
Default



Thanks guys and thanks for not roasting me on my first post. GT2560 it will be. It's actually going in a project car that is hopefully several hundred pounds lighter than a stock Miata. should be fun. Almost done. I'm picking up the chassis and body panels from the powdercoater tomorrow. Here are a few pictures of what was one of my Miatas. These are pre Powdercoat, bare metal.
Attached Thumbnails GT2871 AR .86 for 1.6.  Keep or return?-80-img_20160501_123249_893803258af77488fca871874d9c77bf16ca3af0.jpg  
Del is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 02:01 PM
  #14  
Junior Member
 
.one lane's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Signal Hill, CA
Posts: 257
Total Cats: 13
Default

Wasn't there a user on here that ran a 2871r on his 1.6 powered RX7? Anyways his peak hp was pretty crazy (I think it was a relatively stock motor?), but about 2k of useable powerband before redline.
.one lane is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 02:08 PM
  #15  
Del
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Del's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 11
Total Cats: 2
Default

Pictures



Attached Thumbnails GT2871 AR .86 for 1.6.  Keep or return?-80-img_20160501_123032_5b19d7652c04fcad499f59e9c1681b4d971fc83e.jpg   GT2871 AR .86 for 1.6.  Keep or return?-80-img_20160501_123142_78669702508886d06adcf1e7067d04c39fe68200.jpg   GT2871 AR .86 for 1.6.  Keep or return?-80-img_20160501_123813_4679ce3273fa0848432d211b25573a85efa7eb8d.jpg  
Del is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 02:08 PM
  #16  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by Del
[IMG]https://www.miataturbo.net/attachment.php?attachmentid=172559&dateline=146428 5521[IMG]

Thanks guys and thanks for not roasting me on my first post. GT2560 it will be. It's actually going in a project car that is hopefully several hundred pounds lighter than a stock Miata. should be fun. Almost done. I'm picking up the chassis and body panels from the powdercoater tomorrow. Here are a few pictures of what was one of my Miatas. These are pre Powdercoat, bare metal.
that's going to be a LOT of fun
18psi is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 02:26 PM
  #17  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by .one lane
Wasn't there a user on here that ran a 2871r on his 1.6 powered RX7? Anyways his peak hp was pretty crazy (I think it was a relatively stock motor?), but about 2k of useable powerband before redline.
I ran a 0.86a/r 2871R on a VVT 1.8L motor and didn't think the response was terribly impressive. It made decent power down low, but that was owed to E85 and tons of timing. I've driven 0.86a/r GT2860RS 1.6L cars and it was even worse than my 2871R 1.8L. I can't imagine how laggy a 2871R 1.6L car would feel.

The 2560R is a far better choice.
Savington is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 02:30 PM
  #18  
Junior Member
 
.one lane's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Signal Hill, CA
Posts: 257
Total Cats: 13
Default

Greg's 2554r with the billet wheel did some impressive numbers as well.

Just playing devils advocate
.one lane is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 05-26-2016, 02:56 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
mmmjesse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 574
Total Cats: 44
Default

is your current t28 a ball bearing unit? From my understanding, a 2560 is a t28? 2560s/t28 journal bearing and 2560r/t28r ball bearing?
mmmjesse is offline  
Old 05-26-2016, 03:13 PM
  #20  
Del
Newb
Thread Starter
 
Del's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 11
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by mmmjesse
is your current t28 a ball bearing unit? From my understanding, a 2560 is a t28? 2560s/t28 journal bearing and 2560r/t28r ball bearing?
No, It's not a ball bearing unit. It's a little confusing because my existing turbo has a .42 AR compressor / cold side housing and a .86 AR Hot side Turbine housing. I figure the .86 Hot side is not great for spooling so I would like to go smaller. Here is a picture of the tag from the china turbo that's on the car now.
Attached Thumbnails GT2871 AR .86 for 1.6.  Keep or return?-80-20160422_020147_e1f1d3c88de30fff9ad655dedfbb562676c50214.jpg  
Del is offline  


Quick Reply: GT2871 AR .86 for 1.6. Keep or return?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 AM.