Dyno graphs from NE Dyno Day 11/15/08
11-20-2008, 06:59 PM
#1
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
Dyno graphs from NE Dyno Day 11/15/08
While we are still waiting for the guy at ACA Performance to figure out how to email me the DRF files* I figured I would at least put up the scanned printouts. Not ideal since we can't overlap them but you can glean some info from them. Like Tim don't **** around.
Note that in Artie's gutted manifold pulls the x axis is wheel speed, not engine speed.
My Daily Driver: Stock 94 motor with 269k miles on it, GT2554R, BEGi cast manifold, 2.5" ic piping, 18x12x3" core fmic, AbsurdFlow 3" bellmouthed downpipe/exhaust, 14psi
The Machine: Stock 99 motor with a BEGi turbo intake manifold w70mm tb, GT2560R, 2.5" ic piping, 18x12x3" core fmic, AbsurdFlow turbo manifold/3" bellmouthed downpipe/exhaust, 17psi
Artie's 95 with stock 95 motor/99head with GT2560R, 2.5" ic piping, 18x12x3" core fmic, AbsurdFlow turbo manifold/3" bellmouthed downpipe/exhaust, 15psi
Artie's 95 with stock 95 motor/99 head with gutted intake manifold, GT2560R, 2.5" ic piping, 18x12x3" core fmic, AbsurdFlow turbo manifold/3" bellmouthed downpipe/exhaust, 15psi
In summary:
My daily makes 200+ ftlbs of torque from ~3200rpm to about 5700rpm.
The Machine makes it before 3100rpm and holds it out past redline.
Artie crosses the 200ftlb mark just before 3200rpm and can only hold it to ~6700 rpm with stock intake.
With the gutted intake manifold Artie makes 200ftlbs ~100rpm later and just holds it above that mark out to redline.
Note that in Artie's gutted manifold pulls the x axis is wheel speed, not engine speed.
My Daily Driver: Stock 94 motor with 269k miles on it, GT2554R, BEGi cast manifold, 2.5" ic piping, 18x12x3" core fmic, AbsurdFlow 3" bellmouthed downpipe/exhaust, 14psi
The Machine: Stock 99 motor with a BEGi turbo intake manifold w70mm tb, GT2560R, 2.5" ic piping, 18x12x3" core fmic, AbsurdFlow turbo manifold/3" bellmouthed downpipe/exhaust, 17psi
Artie's 95 with stock 95 motor/99head with GT2560R, 2.5" ic piping, 18x12x3" core fmic, AbsurdFlow turbo manifold/3" bellmouthed downpipe/exhaust, 15psi
Artie's 95 with stock 95 motor/99 head with gutted intake manifold, GT2560R, 2.5" ic piping, 18x12x3" core fmic, AbsurdFlow turbo manifold/3" bellmouthed downpipe/exhaust, 15psi
In summary:
My daily makes 200+ ftlbs of torque from ~3200rpm to about 5700rpm.
The Machine makes it before 3100rpm and holds it out past redline.
Artie crosses the 200ftlb mark just before 3200rpm and can only hold it to ~6700 rpm with stock intake.
With the gutted intake manifold Artie makes 200ftlbs ~100rpm later and just holds it above that mark out to redline.
Last edited by paul; 11-22-2008 at 10:46 AM.
Reply
0
0
11-20-2008, 07:22 PM
#5
Now you have me wanting a 99 head and a new intake mani. Good thing I'm broke at the moment.
The only difference between your setup and Artie's is the intake manifold and throttle body right? So he'd pick up another ~25 hp with that.
The only difference between your setup and Artie's is the intake manifold and throttle body right? So he'd pick up another ~25 hp with that.
Last edited by johndoe; 11-20-2008 at 07:41 PM.
Reply
0
0
11-20-2008, 07:55 PM
#6
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
That and I'm a much better driver on the dyno.
I have much shorter and more direct intercooler piping so that may be worth something.
I also run a 99 bottom end vs Artie's 95 bottom end.
My 300hp run was at 14psi, Artie's 278 is in the 15psi range.
I have much shorter and more direct intercooler piping so that may be worth something.
I also run a 99 bottom end vs Artie's 95 bottom end.
My 300hp run was at 14psi, Artie's 278 is in the 15psi range.
Reply
0
0
11-20-2008, 08:37 PM
#11
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
Yup, I posted that in another thread somewhere. I am considering a 2871 not because I want to make more power but because I want to do it with less boost. The 2560 is definitely maxed out at 14-15psi making 365 crank hp.
Reply
0
0
11-20-2008, 08:40 PM
#12
When going to the gutted mani, was Artie's car leaned out, or was that the same tune from the last run with the full manifold? Looks like it was leaned out more on the top end after the first gutted run. Looks like the stock manifold might have made more power with more tuning on the top end given the afr.
What's the compression difference between the 99 and 95 bottom ends? Just trying to pick out the differences.
What's the compression difference between the 99 and 95 bottom ends? Just trying to pick out the differences.
Reply
0
0
11-20-2008, 08:53 PM
#13
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
The car was re street tuned after the manifold swap. Artie's 3rd pull with the stock intake manifold is within .5 afr.
When we swapped the gutted mani on artie's boost dropped 2-3 psi. I guess this is due to more or the air actually getting into the motor instead of building up in the manifold. So for run 2 we brought the boost back up to 15 where it was for the first set of pulls.
cr on 95 is 8.8:1, 99 is 9.5:1
When we swapped the gutted mani on artie's boost dropped 2-3 psi. I guess this is due to more or the air actually getting into the motor instead of building up in the manifold. So for run 2 we brought the boost back up to 15 where it was for the first set of pulls.
cr on 95 is 8.8:1, 99 is 9.5:1
Reply
0
0
11-20-2008, 08:59 PM
#14
hmm i'm not sure the 2871 should be your next turbo with a stock internals motor. i could be wrong but that torque curve is so sweet i'd hate to see it lost with too laggy of a turbo. do they make a gt2860 .86? i wonder how different spool would be between that and a 2871 .64?
Reply
0
0
11-20-2008, 09:37 PM
#15
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
2871 is a newer and better turbo than the 2860. They are supposed to spool equally but the 2871 flows better.
Active VICS vs gutted manifold would have been more interesting. Too bad.
Active VICS vs gutted manifold would have been more interesting. Too bad.
Reply
0
0
11-20-2008, 10:08 PM
#16
I would have loved to see the boost lines along with the AFR's... but can I assume based on the torque curves of all 3 setups, that full boost is reached around 3500rpm? Can I expect the same response from a 2871? How "inferior" is the 2871 spool... are we talking about 200rpm or 500rpm?
Reply
0
0
