2560 on a 99 motor at 14psi with MSPNP 300hp - 241ft/lbs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-04-2008, 06:52 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
soflarick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Floriduh
Posts: 884
Total Cats: 0
Default

Can you post the timing map? I was curious about that torque dip. That is some stupid power/torque. Good for you.
soflarick is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 06:57 PM
  #22  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
I have a similar dip in torque at 4K (as well as other Megasquirted miatas). Did you start with a DIY timing map and work from there? I suspect we need more timing around there.

can you send me that .drf file?
basically the bottom four rows ARE the DIY PNP timing settings. From 75kpa and up i kinda copied TurboTim's timing map.

here it is scott. http://www.miatamx5.com/dynoruns/12-....miata_003.drf

that rest are obviously in the same directory

Last edited by paul; 01-04-2008 at 07:08 PM.
paul is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 07:03 PM
  #23  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by soflarick
Can you post the timing map? I was curious about that torque dip. That is some stupid power/torque. Good for you.
paul is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 07:06 PM
  #24  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
Default

Originally Posted by Loki047
More Timing STAT!!!

Stock superflow head?
its a stock 99 head on a stock 99 block. currently the VICs is not hooked up so it's sitting in whatever position it sits in at rest. i gotta work on that.
paul is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 08:27 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
soflarick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Floriduh
Posts: 884
Total Cats: 0
Default

If the solenoids are not operating, then the butterflies are in the open position. A vacuum has to be applied to the solenoid to close the butterflies. I had a 99 intake on my engine with the 99 head, operated the VICS via the Hydra ECU. Removed the head for a BRP R4 intake.

On another note, I ran WAY more timing on my engine with the MP62. I've been told the SC can take more timing than a turbo.
soflarick is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 08:49 PM
  #26  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
Default

open is what it would be in low rpms for more torque?
and closed above 5200 for more air flow?

or do i have that backward?
paul is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 08:59 PM
  #27  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

holyfuckingshit. My car is going to be bad.
hustler is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 09:01 PM
  #28  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by paul
the 99's are supposed to handle less due to the higher compression pistons. some say with a good tune it'll be fine. we shall see.
this makes me want to not send my motor for machine work and just run it as is.

With that kinda power, my gt2860rs might be overkill.

what rpm made 8psi?

Last edited by hustler; 01-04-2008 at 09:17 PM.
hustler is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 09:05 PM
  #29  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by paul
open is what it would be in low rpms for more torque?
and closed above 5200 for more air flow?

or do i have that backward?
the longer runners are for low rpm. I can't remember if that's open or closed. Watch a vid of the 787b...its awesome.

Your **** is going to be ******* fast, and make boost sooner if you just pinned it at tdc.
hustler is offline  
Old 01-04-2008, 09:44 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
soflarick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Floriduh
Posts: 884
Total Cats: 0
Default

Butterflies closed at rpm below 5200 and open above. Seems Mazda opened them early, online research and helping one guy on a dyno showed that opening them at 5600 was best.
soflarick is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 06:58 PM
  #31  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
TurboTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,892
Total Cats: 399
Default

Originally Posted by paul
open is what it would be in low rpms for more torque?
and closed above 5200 for more air flow?

or do i have that backward?
You have it backwards. Hence the need for a vacuum canister...as you go WOT the vacuum in the canister keeps the actuator "closed" until you hit the 5200 or 5600 crossover, then the solenoid opens or closes or whatever and the actuator "opens".
TurboTim is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 07:09 PM
  #32  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
Default

What if I just did a mechanical solenoid powered by the MS? Anyone know of something suitable?
paul is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 07:20 PM
  #33  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
TurboTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,892
Total Cats: 399
Default

Oh! yeah that'd be a great idea actually. I know mcmaster has a few 12V solenoids that have decent stroke. go see how much that vacuum canister actuator moves (probably around .5 inch I'd guess) and go look up an electric version on mcmcaster.
TurboTim is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 07:26 PM
  #34  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
Default

i got one in the living room on the spare 99 head. brb...
paul is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 07:38 PM
  #35  
Elite Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Stealth97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canton, Ga
Posts: 2,156
Total Cats: 66
Default

F'n nice. Great numbers.
Stealth97 is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 08:00 PM
  #36  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
Default

here are the butterflies when no vacuum is applied, they are open


here are the butterflies when vacuum is applied, they are closed


here here is how much the actuator arm moves, 1/2" just as Tim guessed


here is the vacuum solenoid


contrary to what some people believe/say these butterflies do not vary the length of the intake runners by redirecting air. in fact what they do is open an additional resonance chamber, much like the external helmholtz resonance chamber found on the intake crossover tubes of the earlier Miatas which is beneficial at low rpm/low velocity intake charge.


now where are these mechanical/electrical solenoids?
paul is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 08:07 PM
  #37  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

so you just needs these to open these at a certain rpm? that's an easy mod!

use the MS to switch the solenoid to ground at whatever RPM, and they'll open. or does the solenoid close with v12?
Braineack is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 08:36 PM
  #38  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Toddcod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,829
Total Cats: 0
Default

Do you have any pic's of the turbo? Im trying to figure out which Garret turbo is on the FM kit I got. I looked at the garrett website. But it would be nice to see one setup. Especially one pushing LT1 Horsepower!
Toddcod is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 09:20 PM
  #39  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Point Pleasant, NJ
Posts: 2,957
Total Cats: 2
Default







paul is offline  
Old 01-06-2008, 09:31 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
soflarick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Floriduh
Posts: 884
Total Cats: 0
Default

Paul, there are 2 solenoids in the VICS system, your photos show both, all you need is an rpm switch to control the electric solenoid operation to feed vacuum or not to the solenoid controlling the butterflies. My Hydra does this, as the BRAIN said the MS will, or you could run an MSD rpm switch or something like that.

Like you said, the VICS doesn't shortcut the intake runners, it opens the butterflies to allow air from a small port into the system. I helped dyno test an N/A 2000 Miata engine, only had a header and exhaust on it, with a 1.6l AFM. The dyno showed the engine ran best when the VICS opened the butterflies at 5600rpm. It was easy to see the difference on the dyno graphs. Even with the 1.6l AFM, the car made 129rwhp with only a Fuji 4/1 header and simple Supertrapp exhaust. The Supertrapp was very restrictive when running street quiet, street disks reduced power to 119. I think a straight through with a Magnaflow would have kept the power at 129. Pretty sweet for an otherwise stock engine.

If you don't want to run the VICS, I've read that keeping the butterflies closed will afford best power at low and little sacrifice up top.
soflarick is offline  


Quick Reply: 2560 on a 99 motor at 14psi with MSPNP 300hp - 241ft/lbs



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 PM.