Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. (https://www.miataturbo.net/)
-   Dynos and timesheets (https://www.miataturbo.net/dynos-timesheets-21/)
-   -   99 BEGi S4 (https://www.miataturbo.net/dynos-timesheets-21/99-begi-s4-32444/)

Ben 03-08-2009 12:07 AM

99 BEGi S4
 
1 Attachment(s)
This is a 99 10AE equipped with a standard BEGi S4 and Xede. Xede is at default, out of the box settings. IE, super rich (10:1 going to 9.x:1) and super weak timing. Stock midpipe/cat, Racing Beat axle back.
Running wastegate only, no boost controller of any sort, appx 11.5 psi. Pulls taken on a mustang dyno and results are not corrected.
For comparison, other cars that ran today
-96 N/A, 80whp
-1.6 M45 car, 120whp.
-99 MP62, 140whp
-94 FM2L 2560, 170whp
-02 FM2H 2560, 170whp

So I'm pretty happy.

Glowing manifold pictures and video coming soon.

NA6C-Guy 03-08-2009 12:19 AM

Cant see shit. is that 192 peak? Good numbers I guess for right out of the box.

samnavy 03-08-2009 03:26 AM

WOW! Close to 200whp on a Mustang Dyno with the stock mid-cat is sweet. Is the S4 stock with a 2560? The curves look fairly streetable too.

RotorNutFD3S 03-08-2009 03:47 AM

To answer your question Sam, yes, 2560.

Glowing Manifold Video:


NA6C-Guy 03-08-2009 05:13 AM

Fuckin whicked!!!

y8s 03-08-2009 11:33 AM

i wouldn't run that car in that configuration long. besides melting shit in the engine bay, that heat is building up because there's a problem (clog?) downstream. there's free power in that bitch somewhere!

GT3man2001 03-08-2009 12:32 PM

All of those numbers look very low. Because of the Mustang Dyno?

y8s 03-08-2009 01:18 PM


Originally Posted by GT3man2001 (Post 379051)
All of those numbers look very low. Because of the Mustang Dyno?

yeah it appears that their numbers would compare with a dynojet better if you add 20%. so ben's 192 is really more like 230ish.

and another thought on my comment on the glowing mani... it may not be clogged exhaust so much as just the untuned xede. not enough advance or fuel or who knows.

kotomile 03-08-2009 01:37 PM

I'm thinking a combination of restriction and tune.

Good #s for that configuration any Ben! I'm sure there's a LOT of power to be had in uncorking the exhaust and dialing in some timing and less fuel!

Ben 03-08-2009 06:31 PM


Originally Posted by y8s (Post 379041)
i wouldn't run that car in that configuration long. besides melting shit in the engine bay, that heat is building up because there's a problem (clog?) downstream. there's free power in that bitch somewhere!

I agree completely that there's more power to be made, and less torque to be lost over 6200. The stock midpipe isn't helping things. Neither are the default settings in the Xede. As far as the possibility of melting shit, watch Paul's videos of the machine on the dyno. He's not having any issues.

Here is the timing map as provided by BEGi:
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/7079/timing1.jpg


This is the actual timing map I run. It's the same in boost, but I have changed all of what I perceive to be vac cells to 0. This eliminated the highly annoying P0300 that would trigger over and over as I would drive.

http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/8660/timing.jpg

I wish I had a table with the stock timing map so that I could see actual timing values instead of offset. I also wish I could corelate the y axis airflow values to actual MAP values. To atleast get me started.


This is the fuel map that came from BEGi and has not been touched by me. It's fat everywhere, and richer than 10:1 up top.
http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/9633/mafg.jpg


Less restrictive exhaust and better ignition are coming, followed by tuning. And perhaps an ECU swap to adaptronic if it's deemed viable.

Ben 03-08-2009 06:39 PM

Sometime I'll figure out how to use this camera and get nice pics. Until then,
http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/3826/pict0093v.jpg
http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/730/pict0094c.jpg
http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/2270/pict0095c.jpg

Ben 03-08-2009 06:42 PM


Originally Posted by GT3man2001 (Post 379051)
All of those numbers look very low. Because of the Mustang Dyno?

The dyno operator told us to expect low numbers. He said that their dyno reads low, even as far as mustang standards go.
Ultimate numbers aren't hugely important though.

Ben 03-08-2009 08:37 PM

started tweaking a little. went back to Bell's base timing map and added just a little in boost. pulled some fuel at idle and in boost. made all the difference in the world.

http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/16/timingnew.jpg
http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/9217/mafnew.jpg


*assuming that Y value 30 is 100kpa.

y8s 03-08-2009 10:31 PM

btw ben, you can get an OBDII scanner and find out what your timing is on the car side.

Corky Bell 03-08-2009 10:33 PM

With most ferrous metals involved with cars, cherry red is somewhere around 1100F. The EGT is seldom below that when under boost or cruising hard. If that manifold wasn't glowing cherry red, something is bad wrong. It doesn't hurt anything and all nearby components are quite well protected.

Sleeper_MX5 03-08-2009 10:38 PM

damn...that mani scares me...it will crack if it keeps doing that.

ZX-Tex 03-08-2009 11:06 PM

The S4 manifold is braced to the motor mount.

hustler 03-09-2009 12:05 AM


Originally Posted by Corky Bell (Post 379245)
With most ferrous metals involved with cars, cherry red is somewhere around 1100F. The EGT is seldom below that when under boost or cruising hard. If that manifold wasn't glowing cherry red, something is bad wrong. It doesn't hurt anything and all nearby components are quite well protected.


Originally Posted by Sleeper_MX5 (Post 379248)
damn...that mani scares me...it will crack if it keeps doing that.

http://smiliesftw.com/x/facepalmsmiley1ti3.gif

y8s 03-09-2009 10:17 AM


Originally Posted by Corky Bell (Post 379245)
With most ferrous metals involved with cars, cherry red is somewhere around 1100F. The EGT is seldom below that when under boost or cruising hard. If that manifold wasn't glowing cherry red, something is bad wrong. It doesn't hurt anything and all nearby components are quite well protected.

my tubular mild steel doesn't glow like that. it glows some at the collector but not nearly that bright. this is at 250 rwhp or so.

m2cupcar 03-09-2009 10:42 AM

y8s - isn't your manifold using far thicker material? Like sched 10 vs. something like 16ga. stainless on the BEGI mani? I wonder if anybody watched mine while it was on the dyno- I know it's 16ga. stainless (or mostly stainless ;) ).

Stephanie Turner 03-09-2009 02:41 PM


Originally Posted by Ben (Post 379182)
*assuming that Y value 30 is 100kpa.

Y value is engine load. Typically, 30 is where it hits boost, but that is not a given.
Stephanie

y8s 03-09-2009 02:58 PM


Originally Posted by m2cupcar (Post 379393)
y8s - isn't your manifold using far thicker material? Like sched 10 vs. something like 16ga. stainless on the BEGI mani? I wonder if anybody watched mine while it was on the dyno- I know it's 16ga. stainless (or mostly stainless ;) ).

it's pretty beefy. i think sch10. it seems about .1" wall-ish.



you can see it get a little red deep down in there...

wildfire0310 03-09-2009 05:26 PM


Originally Posted by m2cupcar (Post 379393)
y8s - isn't your manifold using far thicker material? Like sched 10 vs. something like 16ga. stainless on the BEGI mani? I wonder if anybody watched mine while it was on the dyno- I know it's 16ga. stainless (or mostly stainless ;) ).

I know I didn't even think to see if your manifold was glowing. It doesn't help that your manifold isn't out in the open like Ben's. That and we were all wondering if you were going to put down more power then the Protege.

cueball1 03-09-2009 05:33 PM

Gotta get a decent exhaust on that! A high flow cat and a decent diameter - 2 1/2" or larger.

If you haven't already, put some heat wrap around the cruise cable where it's against the heat sheild. I froze up 2 of them cooking them on track days. With that glow on the dyno you can see why. Some extra heat wrap around the cable took care of it.

ftjandra 03-09-2009 05:37 PM


Originally Posted by m2cupcar (Post 379393)
y8s - isn't your manifold using far thicker material? Like sched 10 vs. something like 16ga. stainless on the BEGI mani? I wonder if anybody watched mine while it was on the dyno- I know it's 16ga. stainless (or mostly stainless ;) ).

I was standing right there next to your car, but I didn't pay any attention to the manifold. I was looking at the real-time hp readout on their computer waiting for the adjustable cam gears to do their magic, lol.

--Ferdi

Ben 03-09-2009 05:53 PM

Jason (enthuza) is going to be hanging on to my car for a few days and making an exhaust. We need to get our schedules together. No rush or timeline set. I told him I wanted something wicked, 3", and dual, and he's got a blank slate from there.

If I can get this freakin xede to datalog, I will actually start some real tuning.

Rob, I did not see your mani glow.

cueball1 03-09-2009 06:13 PM

Nice on the exhaust. I've got an s4 system using Enthuza high flow cat and only a single 2 1/2". The sound is great and my 2860 spools great with it. Should make a huge difference. I went with an early model, 94, to avoid the headaches of piggy back since I have to DEQ.

Tune and exhaust and I'd expect at least another 40hp at that boost level.

Ben 03-09-2009 06:23 PM

no 240 mustang rwhp is not reasonable with only exhaust and tune. 240 dynojet, no problem, I am there or close after the slight tweaks from yesterday.

cueball1 03-09-2009 06:36 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 207558

That's my 94 on a mustang running just under 11lbs. A stock cat has to be a huge restriction. I'm likely completely wrong but I'm betting you'll be suprised when you get that breathing and running right.

Ben 03-09-2009 06:48 PM

Really, really impressive. You've got the potato, I've got the 2560, so I won't be putting down as high of numbers as you.

However, your chart makes me want a potato. Damn.

You've also got a MS don't you?

cueball1 03-09-2009 07:28 PM

Yea, Megasquirt. I gave up the comfort of the NB chassis to get the lack of DEQ trouble and a higher level of control by being OBD1. Paul has proven the 2560 to be a awesome up to 300hp. It's a great turbo for mid 200 levels and I'd guess that's why you went that way. No reason not to expect more of yours.

I'm obviously no turbo guru or wealth of knowledge and likely embarassing myself by thinking you could gain so much. You made good Mustang numbers pig rich and plugged up. I'm just anxious to see what happens when you get the new exhaust and better tune going.

y8s 03-09-2009 07:35 PM


Originally Posted by cueball1 (Post 379602)
http://i184.photobucket.com/albums/x...ustangdyno.jpg

That's my 94 on a mustang running just under 11lbs. A stock cat has to be a huge restriction. I'm likely completely wrong but I'm betting you'll be suprised when you get that breathing and running right.

dont show this graph to hustler...

what exhaust and A/R turbine are you running?

hustler 03-09-2009 07:45 PM


Originally Posted by y8s (Post 379618)
dont show this graph to hustler...

what exhaust and A/R turbine are you running?

probably a tubular manifold. I'm still making 20whp/40wtq more. I already told you that my dyno rpm isn't accurate too. 4k = 1BAR

What is everyone's obsession with my dyno shit?

y8s 03-09-2009 08:27 PM

it's just me

cueball1 03-09-2009 09:07 PM

Y8's. That's just mean!

My set up is the standard S4 tubular with the potato on it. 2 1/2" enthuza with a high flow cat.

Hustler is doing just fine. He'll get used to his current power level and start upping the boost by this fall is my guess. He's used to VW's and all the reliability headaches. Once he gains some confidence in the built motor he'll turn up the screws.

Seriously the power my car made seems to be an anomaly for the set up. I'm thinking of getting it back on the dyno soon now that I have a little more MS knowledge under my belt.

Ben 11-30-2009 03:20 PM

Alright kiddos, going back to the dyno on Thursday with the DIYPNP MS2.

I know I can't top Paul Rein's Machine, but dammit we're gonna try to give him some competition.

Ben 11-30-2009 03:42 PM

Realizing I never posted it here, this is my last run. This run has 3" exhaust compared to stock midpipe with RB 2.5" duals in the previous run. ~12 psi on the dynapack. I hope to beat this Thursday.

http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/17/scan0006mm.jpg

cueball1 11-30-2009 03:56 PM

Nice numbers for 12psi. Stock internals?

Ben 11-30-2009 03:59 PM

Wastegate only and yes.

Ben 12-03-2009 07:05 PM

Had a very frustrating day at the dyno.

Not all of it was bad though. The horrible rattling noise coming from the front of the motor ended up being not serious.

Without boost control, and with the wastegate actuator holding the gate tight, car made 12 psi and 200 ft lbs before 3000 rpm on the dynapack dyno. Unfotunately it creeped to 17 psi by 4800. 17 is the magic number that overboost protection comes in and kills the power. Had 220 rwhp at the cutoff. These numbers put me in line to make power similar to Paul's Machine, which pleases me.

To keep boost at reasonable levels, we had to set the actuator rod to full loose. Spool suffered significantly. 10 psi at 3500, slow creep to 14 by 7000. Ended the day with 245 whp at 7000, at 86% duty cycle on RC550 injectors. 12.5:1 a/f up top, could not make it any richer.

Luckily I can fix the spool problem with boost control, and I've got an MTuned fuel rail. I'll also pick up a 250HP fuel pump.

245 sounds a bit low, but the fact that I'm running out of fuel with 550s says a lot. Since we were out of fuel, and it was already 5pm, we didn't even adjust timing. After the boost control and fuel upgrades, I'll try again. I don't expect to hit Paul's numbers, but I am going to get close. I credit it to the bottom mount turbo and straight downpipe.

We also did scope the LS2 truck coils, which are little monsters. Optimal dwell is 4.5 ms wasted spark. When I get a CAS and start running sequential, I'll bring them to 5.5 ms.

Savington 12-03-2009 07:16 PM

245whp on 550s at 86% screams dying fuel pump. Leave the fuel rail stock, upgrade the pump, and go back.

Ben 12-03-2009 07:25 PM

I don't disagree at all, but I already own the rail. Figure I'll do the rail and the pump at the same time and only smell like fuel once. The filter has already been replaced.

NAshowdown95 12-03-2009 07:37 PM

Good luck with the pulls after fuel upgrades. Interested in seeing final numbers with some Ign timing.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:00 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands