Dynosheet, one year later.
 

So, after initial tuning last year producing 215rwhp, I moved over to a 3" Enthuza setup and now have 233rwhp.

Lost some low-rpm torque, either due to suckier boost control (had EBC back then) or something else.

Don't look at absolute values, they're in Nm and KW. Multiply both by 1.36 to get lbft and rwhp.

looks like you had 207rwhp/213rwtq previously and now 231rwhp/202rwtq.

Definitely better up top, maybe you had a boost spike before.

Note to self: MLV from 2008 and 2009:

look at the timing when you're spooling. first log has it retard fast once in positive pressure, second one slowly drops....could be a clue.

Old spark, new spark (retarded some degrees with detcans):

I wish i had my spark table on my work computer. You would not believe it. I got the timing light out too, just to make sure everything was right.

so noisy.

Old MLV is indeed, said due to crappy exh restrictions and shitty EBC.
Or do you think the 2nd graph is noisy too? Cuz then I call Hustler upon you.

the old one obviously.

It's OK, we can open any of the other 37 threads where someone posted their spark table. Yours will undoubtedly be there already, along with a comment about running 227/261 on a real dyno.:hustler::hustler::hustler:

:laugh::laugh::laugh:

i haz a new spark table with the ABSURDflow hot-parts with V-Bands!!!!

Oh yeah. I forgot. Post it up bitch.

Base timing is at 10* +/- 1* so that shouldn't be an issue.

Analysis so far:
- Timing looks different, spark table not very much so sub 4krpm.
- Boost build up not very different, maybe better even, need to open MLV's again to see.

Turned my MBC a quarter of a turn. Seeing full boost (1 bar, 200kpa) sooner: at 3.5krpm onward (flat road in 4th) instead of 4krpm. Making 200kpa-dead to redline. Going to redyno this winter.