Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

1.8L build, aiming for ~275whp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-2013, 12:21 PM
  #101  
Junior Member
 
Hungry-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 65
Total Cats: -2
Default

Why are people recommending FM stage 2 clutch when they are meant for over 300whp? Wouldn't it be be unnecessary heavy clutch pedal for his power level?
(I am asking because I am doing a build very close to the OP's and just ordered a FM stage 1 happy meal... Do I need to change to the stage 2 happy meal?)
Hungry-R is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 01:07 PM
  #102  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

pedal feels stock and can handle almost anything you throw at it.


turn down the disrepect and stop questioning us.
Braineack is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 01:29 PM
  #103  
Junior Member
 
Hungry-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 65
Total Cats: -2
Default

I don't mean to disrespect anyone.
I was wondering because I have ordered the stage 1 FM happy meal for my car that I am building with the similar power goals as the op.

Since people were recommending the stage 2 clutch, I was thinking maybe there was something wrong with the stage 1 clutch from FM that I can not seem to bring up by searching.

I was just going by what fm said on their site about stage 2 being
...for "Serious HP" cars only. Pedal effort is substantial, so if you don`t have 300 hp or more...
So the recommendation is that I should change my order from FM level 1 to FM level 2 happy meal?

Thank you for answering my noob questions...
Hungry-R is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 01:32 PM
  #104  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

if you really don't plan to exceed the 275whp the stg1 should be ok
if later you get the itch for more, and most do, then it won't hold up too long above that.

so basically yes and no
18psi is offline  
Old 03-11-2013, 01:49 PM
  #105  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Stg1 is fine. But driving both, I wouldn't call the FM2 effort substantial, I'd call it a little heavier. the ACT XT was substantial, the Clutchnet Dual-Diaphragm Stg3 was SUBSTANTIAL, the FM2...hardly noticed.
Braineack is offline  
Old 03-12-2013, 05:01 PM
  #106  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Lee04vr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Virginia Beach, Va
Posts: 139
Total Cats: 5
Default

Pedal pressure on the FM level 2 clutch is not bad at all anyone who thinks that is a heavy clutch pedal has never driven a cobra mustang.
Lee04vr is offline  
Old 03-12-2013, 05:35 PM
  #107  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

hell, even a Mustang GT.
Braineack is offline  
Old 03-12-2013, 05:39 PM
  #108  
Elite Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Ryan_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 2,568
Total Cats: 217
Default

I DD with an FM2 clutch and I don't even mind it in heavy traffic. It is heavier than stock but you get use to it in no time and I think it has better feel to it, as in the point of engagement is much easier to feel in the pedal.
Ryan_G is offline  
Old 03-15-2013, 11:23 PM
  #109  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mazdaspeeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 916
Total Cats: 70
Default

Car is done and while the clutch is stiffer, it's totally doable and once you get some miles on it, gets easier. Car runs great too and just got tuned for 12psi on the stock turbo while I wait for my EFR manifold to arrive. The fun continues!
Mazdaspeeder is offline  
Old 04-12-2013, 07:56 PM
  #110  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
Default

updates? I'm about to purchase a bunch of parts, and our builds are looking quite similar
psyber_0ptix is offline  
Old 04-13-2013, 08:36 AM
  #111  
Senior Member
 
timk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,278
Total Cats: 37
Default

Did you have problems with the main studs and the MBSP?
timk is offline  
Old 04-13-2013, 10:16 AM
  #112  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mazdaspeeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 916
Total Cats: 70
Default

Yes, the machine shop cut the MBSP like so to fit them. They also de-burred the MBSP for me





Attached Thumbnails 1.8L build, aiming for ~275whp-182353_450040318392954_865591516_n.jpg   1.8L build, aiming for ~275whp-252391_450040025059650_342422484_n.jpg  

Last edited by Mazdaspeeder; 04-13-2013 at 10:27 AM.
Mazdaspeeder is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quinn
Cars for sale/trade
6
10-23-2016 07:58 AM
LucaCarMods
Build Threads
11
02-14-2016 06:13 AM
Rick02R
WTB
3
01-03-2016 07:18 PM
shooterschmidty
Engine Performance
8
09-30-2015 10:28 PM
Rhidell
Meet and Greet
1
09-27-2015 09:42 AM



Quick Reply: 1.8L build, aiming for ~275whp



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 PM.