Why so little compression?
Shitty gas? |
Originally Posted by Full_Tilt_Boogie
(Post 833730)
Why so little compression?
Shitty gas? |
2 Attachment(s)
|
I did notice some components missing; most notably the ATI damper and a crank scraper. Budget issues? Also why no VVT?
Anyway, great numbers. Really eager to see what this baby does with more tuning, a better manifold and E85. |
Originally Posted by Reverant
(Post 833733)
I did notice some components missing; most notably the ATI damper and a crank scraper. Budget issues? Also why no VVT?
Anyway, great numbers. Really eager to see what this baby does with more tuning, a better manifold and E85. |
Oh yeah, ARP head and main studs.
|
what is the bracket between the radiator and engine supporting, an oil cooler of some sorts? or?
plenty of room for the Rotrex |
Originally Posted by mx594m
(Post 833740)
what is the bracket between the radiator and engine supporting, an oil cooler of some sorts? or?
plenty of room for the Rotrex |
So, what kind of power are you hoping to generate with fi?
I've noticed that you list 300 whp as a safe limit with the 85.5 mm pistons, but with the use of e85, I'd wager you are hoping to get to 400ish? |
Flat timing above 6500?
|
Originally Posted by glade
(Post 833755)
So, what kind of power are you hoping to generate with fi?
I've noticed that you list 300 whp as a safe limit with the 85.5 mm pistons, but with the use of e85, I'd wager you are hoping to get to 400ish? |
Oh how Id love to see this thing mated to a borg on e85.
Also, and this may be a dumb question, but: what is the big dip in hp/tq at 3800ish? |
I have an 11.5:1, knife crank, 85mm bore, ported 99 head in the garage. It's really sad because it needs a car, VVT head, and MS3x. I should also note that its not "my engine", lol.
It will be interesting to see what my stock VVT engine does on sweet, Texas 93-octane. I wonder how it will compare. Are you det limited or did you see MBT at peak efficiency range? I love peak-efficiency at ~6000rpm, lol. |
Originally Posted by emilio700
(Post 833760)
I'm not set on a power number. To reach the lap time and race goals I have for the car I think it will need 350-400whp. If we have a bore related problem we will build another one with smaller pistons, 11.0:1 and a VVT head.
|
Originally Posted by Faeflora
(Post 833759)
Flat timing above 6500?
For those asking questions about the tune, power band and such, it only has a rough tune now. It will get some other hardware and a lot more tuning so don't read too much into where it is now. |
This thread burns my ass. If we had the knowledge we had today when I bought all this turbo ----, I'd have a 10-11:1 bottom end, VVT head, and probably 180whp rather than another $5000 in turbo stuff so I can turn the boost down to ~210whp.
|
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 833770)
This thread burns my ass. If we had the knowledge we had today when I bought all this turbo ----, I'd have a 10-11:1 bottom end, VVT head, and probably 180whp rather than another $5000 in turbo stuff so I can turn the boost down to ~210whp.
|
Originally Posted by Midtenn
(Post 833776)
The[redacted] reduced thermal load of a NA car is very tempting given what my track budget may end up being.
|
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 833781)
I'm not so sure a 200hp NA car makes less heat than a 200whp turbo car.
|
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 833781)
I'm not so sure a 200hp NA car makes less heat than a 200whp turbo car.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands