compression ratios
So i have a '92 model with a 1.6 that is getting closer and closer to death, ive got a '99 bp motor that is going to replace it. My plan is to build the bp to help support a turbo conversion. I am currently on my p plates in australia so im restricted to no forced induction for another 12 months. my power goals are around the 300hp mark, maybe more, maybe less, ill see what i can get.
From what i can figure, i have several options:
1. Swap the bp in now as is to replace the dying motor and build/turbo in 12 months.
2. Build the motor now to turbo spec i.e.: lower compression forged pistons and rods etc. i do understand that you can run a turbo setup without building the engine, but for safety and a bit of piece of mind im choosing to.
3. Hope the 1.6 lasts for another 12 months while building the 1.8 and put it in with the turbo once i get my full license.
Im leaning towards option 2 because it means i can diagnose problems with the engine swap separately to the conversion to FI and i wont have to rip the motor out again for the foreseeable future. My question is this, will i be able to run the motor without a turbo with the lower compression ratio, probably 9.0:1, by compensating for the lack of compression via ECU tuning?
sorry if this has already been answered or the answer is blatantly obvious.
From what i can figure, i have several options:
1. Swap the bp in now as is to replace the dying motor and build/turbo in 12 months.
2. Build the motor now to turbo spec i.e.: lower compression forged pistons and rods etc. i do understand that you can run a turbo setup without building the engine, but for safety and a bit of piece of mind im choosing to.
3. Hope the 1.6 lasts for another 12 months while building the 1.8 and put it in with the turbo once i get my full license.
Im leaning towards option 2 because it means i can diagnose problems with the engine swap separately to the conversion to FI and i wont have to rip the motor out again for the foreseeable future. My question is this, will i be able to run the motor without a turbo with the lower compression ratio, probably 9.0:1, by compensating for the lack of compression via ECU tuning?
sorry if this has already been answered or the answer is blatantly obvious.
yes you can run 9.0:1 but on a n/a lower compression = less power.
i would honestly post this on mx5cartalk instead of here. people dont like noobs here aha.
so how is your 1.6 about to die if you dont mind sharing?? these motors are tough as f#ck maybe its an easy fix
i would honestly post this on mx5cartalk instead of here. people dont like noobs here aha.
so how is your 1.6 about to die if you dont mind sharing?? these motors are tough as f#ck maybe its an easy fix
thanks guys that answers my question. anyway, previous owner was useless and managed to flatten one side of the keyway on the crank :/ its loc-tited back together now but every now and then it still feels like its slipped out of timing a bit and then comes good again. it just doesn't feel right anymore.
build the motor now to turbo spec.
when my turbo broke my car basically became a N/A intercooled 1.9. even with all the intake restriction (85kpa under WOT, lol) etc etc it was a bit faster than a stock 99 with super-healthy engine.
when my turbo broke my car basically became a N/A intercooled 1.9. even with all the intake restriction (85kpa under WOT, lol) etc etc it was a bit faster than a stock 99 with super-healthy engine.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
graexodus
Miata parts for sale/trade
9
Oct 25, 2015 03:34 PM
Motorsport-Electronics
ECUs and Tuning
0
Sep 5, 2015 08:02 AM






