The definitive "How do I catch can?" thread.
04-08-2015, 04:55 PM
#81
You have to pull vacuum on the can, so the fuel vapor is pulled out of the block. The only thing you (and pat) get in your can right now is from blowby forcing oil vapor out the breather. Any other time it is doing nothing.
You aren't in boost for long, so the total time your block is being cleaned is nil. A catch can is meant to catch oil and garbage, to keep that garbage from going to cause detonation. After you run a stupid rich pull you'll be coasting in vac, scrubbing 99.9% of the time.
The other side needs to be vented with a breather, so the vacuum isn't pulling against a plugged block, there must be airflow. If you don't like fuel/oil smell leaking out with blowby under boost, you install a catch can between the breather on the exhaust side in addition to the one you already installed on the intake side. It only functions in boost, when the PCV is closed by positive pressure.
The valve cover has a setup like this built in, but it is tiny and weak. I don't know how this is all so confusing to you all...
You aren't in boost for long, so the total time your block is being cleaned is nil. A catch can is meant to catch oil and garbage, to keep that garbage from going to cause detonation. After you run a stupid rich pull you'll be coasting in vac, scrubbing 99.9% of the time.
The other side needs to be vented with a breather, so the vacuum isn't pulling against a plugged block, there must be airflow. If you don't like fuel/oil smell leaking out with blowby under boost, you install a catch can between the breather on the exhaust side in addition to the one you already installed on the intake side. It only functions in boost, when the PCV is closed by positive pressure.
The valve cover has a setup like this built in, but it is tiny and weak. I don't know how this is all so confusing to you all...
I don't know if PCV is actually better for your oil or not (maybe?) but it definitely lets 10,000 more oil into the engine than the breather does. Even if you put a catch can on the PCV side still some is going to go in the engine, and then you have a catch can to drain/clean. I've run without PCV for 8 years so far and have not had a problem that I know of, never had blowby problems, I run all the boost.
If your oil strongly smells like fuel I'm guessing you have a mechanical problem.
Reply
0
0
04-08-2015, 04:55 PM
#82
You have the two lines on your valve cover going to one catch can with a breather, am I right? Look at that setup, look at it long and hard. How it it ever supposed to do anything, air does not move on it's own.
Any time you are not in boost, the PCV is sucking air out of your block and into the intake manifold. It gets this air through a breather on the exhaust side. We don't like this garbage being burned, so we install a catch can between the PCV valve and intake manifold. We don't use fine steel wool, because that's dumb and kills the airflow that actually rids our oil of fuel.
I can't explain any better than this. Auto manufacturers have known since the beginning of time that even brand new rings leak and that ridding the block or even pulling a slight vacuum to help them seal is a good idea. The only reason PCV exists is because the epa won't let them dump straight to the air with drag vac tubes any more, and they don't care enough to buy a catch can when they can turn the timing down.
Any time you are not in boost, the PCV is sucking air out of your block and into the intake manifold. It gets this air through a breather on the exhaust side. We don't like this garbage being burned, so we install a catch can between the PCV valve and intake manifold. We don't use fine steel wool, because that's dumb and kills the airflow that actually rids our oil of fuel.
I can't explain any better than this. Auto manufacturers have known since the beginning of time that even brand new rings leak and that ridding the block or even pulling a slight vacuum to help them seal is a good idea. The only reason PCV exists is because the epa won't let them dump straight to the air with drag vac tubes any more, and they don't care enough to buy a catch can when they can turn the timing down.
Reply
-1
-1
04-08-2015, 04:59 PM
#83
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 916
Total Cats: 70
You have the two lines on your valve cover going to one catch can with a breather, am I right? Look at that setup, look at it long and hard. How it it ever supposed to do anything, air does not move on it's own.
Any time you are not in boost, the PCV is sucking air out of your block and into the intake manifold. It gets this air through a breather on the exhaust side. We don't like this garbage being burned, so we install a catch can between the PCV valve and intake manifold. We don't use fine steel wool, because that's dumb and kills the airflow that actually rids our oil of fuel.
I can't explain any better than this. Auto manufacturers have known since the beginning of time that even brand new rings leak and that ridding the block or even pulling a slight vacuum to help them seal is a good idea.
Any time you are not in boost, the PCV is sucking air out of your block and into the intake manifold. It gets this air through a breather on the exhaust side. We don't like this garbage being burned, so we install a catch can between the PCV valve and intake manifold. We don't use fine steel wool, because that's dumb and kills the airflow that actually rids our oil of fuel.
I can't explain any better than this. Auto manufacturers have known since the beginning of time that even brand new rings leak and that ridding the block or even pulling a slight vacuum to help them seal is a good idea.
Reply
0
0
04-08-2015, 05:03 PM
#85
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 916
Total Cats: 70
Motor is at 2000 miles on the build and runs good. Should I check leakdown?
What do I need to modify about the valve cover? It's confusing because on page 2 of this people said that the setup I had was fine.
What do I need to modify about the valve cover? It's confusing because on page 2 of this people said that the setup I had was fine.
Reply
0
0
04-08-2015, 05:03 PM
#86
Auto manufacturers have known since the beginning of time that even brand new rings leak and that ridding the block or even pulling a slight vacuum to help them seal is a good idea. The only reason PCV exists is because the epa won't let them dump straight to the air with drag vac tubes any more, and they don't care enough to buy a catch can when they can turn the timing down.
Reply
0
0
04-08-2015, 05:05 PM
#87
I have not modified my 99' or 01 valve covers, and never had problems but again, I don't run PCV.
My setup:
Block PCV valve/don't use it.
Pipe breather tube upstream of turbo/sc/air filter. Install catch can here if you wish, but not required in my experience.
Done.
Reply
0
0
04-08-2015, 05:10 PM
#88
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 916
Total Cats: 70
So if I was to run a can between the intake manifold and the intake side of the valve cover, would I use a PCV or drill it out and make it just a tube?
this is another setup I had. Why did this fill with oil so fast? Was it because we were pulling from the wrong side of the cover?
This is the difference I am seeing so far. Everyone else has it between the intake side of the motor and the intake manifold, not the exhaust and intake manifold.
The one thing I thought was happening is that the pressure in the manifold was actually causing enough suction to just suck air out of the valve cover and into the can. That's why I disconnected the can from the intake manifold completely. I didn't know the different sides of the cover had different functions.
this is another setup I had. Why did this fill with oil so fast? Was it because we were pulling from the wrong side of the cover?
This is the difference I am seeing so far. Everyone else has it between the intake side of the motor and the intake manifold, not the exhaust and intake manifold.
The one thing I thought was happening is that the pressure in the manifold was actually causing enough suction to just suck air out of the valve cover and into the can. That's why I disconnected the can from the intake manifold completely. I didn't know the different sides of the cover had different functions.
Reply
0
0
04-08-2015, 05:35 PM
#89
If you turn right hard, like with slicks, you gonna pool oil right where the pcv picks up and suck a whole bunch out. I blocked mine with a cutoff wheel stud shoved into the rubber grommet. My air/oil separator does what its name implies and I dont get any oil into my intake unless I fill the drain up and siphon it out of the separator. I dont mean "like no oil" I mean, you touch the inside of the intake tube and the inside of the turbo and your finger doesnt come back greasy feeling. And no you cant buy my a/o separator, too much of a pain in the *** to make the first one to make it worth making a 2nd.
If you have gas smelling oil you've either got toasted rings or you're running way too rich.
If you have gas smelling oil you've either got toasted rings or you're running way too rich.
Reply
0
0
04-08-2015, 05:40 PM
#91
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 916
Total Cats: 70
If you turn right hard, like with slicks, you gonna pool oil right where the pcv picks up and suck a whole bunch out. I blocked mine with a cutoff wheel stud shoved into the rubber grommet. My air/oil separator does what its name implies and I dont get any oil into my intake unless I fill the drain up and siphon it out of the separator. I dont mean "like no oil" I mean, you touch the inside of the intake tube and the inside of the turbo and your finger doesnt come back greasy feeling. And no you cant buy my a/o separator, too much of a pain in the *** to make the first one to make it worth making a 2nd.
If you have gas smelling oil you've either got toasted rings or you're running way to rich.
If you have gas smelling oil you've either got toasted rings or you're running way to rich.
Rich is a concern. I do want to get my can setup in order as well. As I said, I get black clouds if I do a hard pull to redline, and I am using SOME oil, but as my tuner said, a high power turbo car will use oil. I am not adding enough to be concerned about it, had to add .5qt after my tuner had it for 3 weeks but since then its been pretty solid level (till we just changed it). Rich I mean I am running 11.5:1 at WOT.
I am not shitting any bricks until Blackstone tells me to but when my mechanic said that it would lead to much quicker bearing wear, I pooped a little.
Reply
0
0
04-08-2015, 05:40 PM
#92
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,650
Total Cats: 3,010
Running 17psi from an EFR and making 311whp is more than the tiny volume of the crankcase, the chambers of the valve cover, and the little lines going to your little catch can can handle. You are at roughly three times the stock power with the same size expansion volume in your crankcase and wee tiny openings to let it out. The velocity of the gasses trying to get through those little ports is going to be in excess of the design parameters of the system.
It would be advantageous to do any or all of the following:
1. increase crankcase volume
2. increase the opening sizes that the vapors pass through in the valve cover
3. increase the diameter of the evacuation lines
4. increase the volume of the catch can
The #1 above would decrease the pressure rise with each pulse by allowing a larger expansion volume. The #2 above would allow the gasses to travel more slowly and allow the oil to settle out of the gasses better. #3 is the same as #2 in that slower moving gasses aren't going to carry as much liquid to the catch can. #4 allows the vapor to slow and the liquids to fall out of suspension. If the can has too small a volume then the filter will puke oil regularly. A large set of lines hooked to large passages and a large can will emulate a larger crankcase volume as well.
It would be advantageous to do any or all of the following:
1. increase crankcase volume
2. increase the opening sizes that the vapors pass through in the valve cover
3. increase the diameter of the evacuation lines
4. increase the volume of the catch can
The #1 above would decrease the pressure rise with each pulse by allowing a larger expansion volume. The #2 above would allow the gasses to travel more slowly and allow the oil to settle out of the gasses better. #3 is the same as #2 in that slower moving gasses aren't going to carry as much liquid to the catch can. #4 allows the vapor to slow and the liquids to fall out of suspension. If the can has too small a volume then the filter will puke oil regularly. A large set of lines hooked to large passages and a large can will emulate a larger crankcase volume as well.
Reply
0
0
04-08-2015, 05:43 PM
#93
Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 20,650
Total Cats: 3,010
If you can see black smoke in your rear view mirror under acceleration and you aren't running diesel, you have a shitty tune and a shitty tuner.
Running excessively rich will wash down the cylinders and cause excess ring wear which means more blowby. 2000 miles of **** tune is more than enough to junk a set of rings and necessitate a rehone/rering.
Running excessively rich will wash down the cylinders and cause excess ring wear which means more blowby. 2000 miles of **** tune is more than enough to junk a set of rings and necessitate a rehone/rering.
Reply
0
0
04-08-2015, 05:44 PM
#94
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 916
Total Cats: 70
Running 17psi from an EFR and making 311whp is more than the tiny volume of the crankcase, the chambers of the valve cover, and the little lines going to your little catch can can handle. You are at roughly three times the stock power with the same size expansion volume in your crankcase and wee tiny openings to let it out. The velocity of the gasses trying to get through those little ports is going to be in excess of the design parameters of the system.
It would be advantageous to do any or all of the following:
1. increase crankcase volume
2. increase the opening sizes that the vapors pass through in the valve cover
3. increase the diameter of the evacuation lines
4. increase the volume of the catch can
The #1 above would decrease the pressure rise with each pulse by allowing a larger expansion volume. The #2 above would allow the gasses to travel more slowly and allow the oil to settle out of the gasses better. #3 is the same as #2 in that slower moving gasses aren't going to carry as much liquid to the catch can. #4 allows the vapor to slow and the liquids to fall out of suspension. If the can has too small a volume then the filter will puke oil regularly. A large set of lines hooked to large passages and a large can will emulate a larger crankcase volume as well.
It would be advantageous to do any or all of the following:
1. increase crankcase volume
2. increase the opening sizes that the vapors pass through in the valve cover
3. increase the diameter of the evacuation lines
4. increase the volume of the catch can
The #1 above would decrease the pressure rise with each pulse by allowing a larger expansion volume. The #2 above would allow the gasses to travel more slowly and allow the oil to settle out of the gasses better. #3 is the same as #2 in that slower moving gasses aren't going to carry as much liquid to the catch can. #4 allows the vapor to slow and the liquids to fall out of suspension. If the can has too small a volume then the filter will puke oil regularly. A large set of lines hooked to large passages and a large can will emulate a larger crankcase volume as well.
Thanks again Sixshooter!
If you can see black smoke in your rear view mirror under acceleration and you aren't running diesel, you have a shitty tune and a shitty tuner.
Running excessively rich will wash down the cylinders and cause excess ring wear which means more blowby. 2000 miles of **** tune is more than enough to junk a set of rings and necessitate a rehone/rering.
Running excessively rich will wash down the cylinders and cause excess ring wear which means more blowby. 2000 miles of **** tune is more than enough to junk a set of rings and necessitate a rehone/rering.
Reply
0
0
04-08-2015, 05:55 PM
#96
Hell the motor in my car now I ran in the high 9's (racing with bad intercooler setup, 170F* AITs) and no cat and it didn't smoke! But it's 10.5:1 comp and was a new motor. My lower comp motors of the past smoked at that AFR. Both were obviously down on power/too rich/not good for motor but too rich is better than detonation for that night of drag racing. Now maybe soviet can tell me 9:1 is rich again.
Reply
0
0
04-08-2015, 06:28 PM
#97
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 916
Total Cats: 70
I will work on the rich issues with my tuner, it is quite possible that my WBo2 sensor is out of wack, its pretty old.
However, on the catch-can, does it make sense that the can would be collecting oil at a rapid rate because I had the hose hooked to the wrong side of the valve cover, or should it not be collecting oil that fast no matter which side of the valve cover I am connected to? I do not understand how the baffles there work but I do remember that the OEM configuration is from the intake side of the engine right to the manifold (with pcv), and then the stock catch-can was connected to the exhaust side of the valve cover and then eventually went back to the pre-turbo intake and had a return line to the oil pan for overflow. The setup I had that collected excess oil was a can between the exhaust side of the cover and to the intake manifold
I will try to change the setup and run the can between the intake and intake manifold, vs the exhaust side and intake manifold like before, and see if anything changes. Does it matter if I have a PCV in the intake side of the valve cover?
However, on the catch-can, does it make sense that the can would be collecting oil at a rapid rate because I had the hose hooked to the wrong side of the valve cover, or should it not be collecting oil that fast no matter which side of the valve cover I am connected to? I do not understand how the baffles there work but I do remember that the OEM configuration is from the intake side of the engine right to the manifold (with pcv), and then the stock catch-can was connected to the exhaust side of the valve cover and then eventually went back to the pre-turbo intake and had a return line to the oil pan for overflow. The setup I had that collected excess oil was a can between the exhaust side of the cover and to the intake manifold
I will try to change the setup and run the can between the intake and intake manifold, vs the exhaust side and intake manifold like before, and see if anything changes. Does it matter if I have a PCV in the intake side of the valve cover?
Reply
0
0
04-08-2015, 06:43 PM
#99
On a street car I would certainly want a pcv valve on the passengers side and maybe have a catch can on it. The main purpose of the PCV valve is to regulate the amount of vacuum being pulled on the crank case so that you dont pull the full 20inHG ish manifold vacuum that you do in overrun, or even pull the full vacuum of idle. On a racecar with slicks I'd pass on it.
Reply
0
0
04-08-2015, 06:54 PM
#100
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 916
Total Cats: 70
On a street car I would certainly want a pcv valve on the passengers side and maybe have a catch can on it. The main purpose of the PCV valve is to regulate the amount of vacuum being pulled on the crank case so that you dont pull the full 20inHG ish manifold vacuum that you do in overrun, or even pull the full vacuum of idle. On a racecar with slicks I'd pass on it.
Seems simple, and what we had before, except pulling from the wrong cover side.
Reply
0
0
