Notices
Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Discussion: E85 N/A Performance Gains

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 11:40 AM
  #21  
Petersjohnson's Avatar
Newb
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6
Total Cats: 0
Default

The only extra weight is a couple rubber hoses and the regulator. The rail is aluminum which will be lighter than factory. I have plenty of weight to lose in other areas of the car.
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 11:44 AM
  #22  
Leafy's Avatar
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 9,491
Total Cats: 105
From: NH
Default

The m-tuned aluminum rail weighs more than the stock aluminum rail. You're also missing the weight of the fittings, and hose clamps which all add up. The stock rail and the stock regulator are the lightest setup and will not make any less power than what you want to put in.
Old Dec 9, 2013 | 07:42 PM
  #23  
Lincoln Logs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 530
Total Cats: 64
From: San Diego
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
Yes it is. You can either stay with the stocker or get the DW65 or DW200 if you really want to upgrade. Anything more might be a bit rough on your stock fpr and/or might overwhelm it
OE is more than enough, I know of someone with a 255 Walbro & OE regulator who is getting excess fuel pressure. You can get an OE replacement Bosch fuel pump for $62 on Amazon. I am thinking of replacing mine now as I am having an intermittent hiccup where I can hear the fuel pump relay reset(new-used one ordered too), car goes lean, and then it goes about it's business.

As an aside, I hit the dyno for one last number before I make the switch in a week. Car made 137whp/123tq on 91, however I did notice the duty cycle was showing ~73% near redline. I am starting to question if I need injectors, the most cost efficient would be re-manufactured RX-8 injectors from RockAuto ($130 a set). I may give it a shot without them at first, but it's something to keep my eyes on.
Old Dec 25, 2013 | 05:32 PM
  #24  
Lincoln Logs's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 530
Total Cats: 64
From: San Diego
Default

For those that are interested I took the plunge 2 days ago and made the change to E85. I ordered some GB Manufacturing RX-8 injectors from RockAuto. $155 shipped to my door and they are re-manufactured Denso. Swapped these in, made sure nothing leaked and ran the car nearly dry. Obligatory picture of injectors.


After looking like a moron driving my car endlessly around my neighborhood with fuel jugs in the car I got the car nearly sputtering and shut it off. I filled with 5 gallons of E85 and it fired up. I altered my req fuel by changing the stoich number from 14.7 to 9.76 and everything worked fairly well. I got the car drivable and went straight to the E85 pump 5 minutes away and filled the tank up the rest of the way


For the fuel map I left my AFR targets at 12.8 for my 100kpa rows and left my timing the same. I will be on a dyno within a week or two and from there I'll start playing with a leaner mixture and more timing. I have noticed I need to decrease the cranking pulse in the colder areas, it really sputters at first and doesn't always catch. I attached my map if you care to look at it, I've noticed the injectors are at about 57% duty cycle with the car as it is.
Attached Thumbnails Discussion: E85 N/A Performance Gains-11535670786_cc15ebdd48_b.jpg   Discussion: E85 N/A Performance Gains-11535665546_df0e00ea76_b.jpg  
Attached Files
File Type: msq
e85 basemap.msq (84.2 KB, 141 views)

Last edited by Lincoln Logs; Dec 26, 2013 at 10:30 AM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
emilio700
Wheels and Tires
151
Jun 2, 2017 02:36 PM
Quinn
Cars for sale/trade
6
Oct 23, 2016 07:58 AM
TheNomad
MEGAsquirt
6
Oct 1, 2015 10:47 AM
MiataGarage
Engine Performance
5
Sep 29, 2015 11:04 PM
2000SE
ECUs and Tuning
5
Sep 8, 2015 11:30 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 AM.