Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. (https://www.miataturbo.net/)
-   Engine Performance (https://www.miataturbo.net/engine-performance-56/)
-   -   DIY: How to tap fuel rail on NB2 for return fuel system (https://www.miataturbo.net/engine-performance-56/diy-how-tap-fuel-rail-nb2-return-fuel-system-88076/)

ajay842 03-07-2016 08:45 PM

DIY: How to tap fuel rail on NB2 for return fuel system
 
7 Attachment(s)
So with my engine swap project, I did not have pump that would now work with the returnless fuel rail.

I also could not take a NA FPR and put it on the fuel rail because the NB fuel rail is different than me NB2.

List of special tools needed:

1/8 NPT tap
21/64 drill bit
Punch
Fuel line disconnect tool(?)
Carb cleaner
Sealant for the fuel rail outlet barb


I won't go into major detail, but I will go over the general process.

You will have to remove the fuel rail, which requires removing the intake manifold.


Each intake runner will have 2 12mm nuts and there are 2 12mm(?) manifold support bolts. Underneath and between the number 3 and 4 runner there is a 10mm bolt holding a pipe for the oil cooler I believe.

After you remove the intake manifold the fuel rail will have to come out. Unplug each injector and there are 3 12mm bolts holding the rail on. Don't loose any of the bushings for the rail.

Okay, time for pics. This is where you will tap the hose barb.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457401533

Secure the rail in a vice (don't crush it!)

Use your punch and try to make a pilot dot right in the center. and drill the hole using a 21/64 drill bit.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457401533


Now take your 1/8" NPT tap and I got about 3 good threads. Grease the end of your tap and it will collect the shavings.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457401533


Thread your hose barb in to make sure it's the right one.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457401533


At this point grab your carb cleaner and really, really clean the rail out. Get every last shaving out of that thing you do not want them clogging your injectors.

Once you clean it I wrapped my barb twice with teflon and tightened until it bottomed out. You can use whatever sealant you prefer.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457401533

Put the rail back on.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457401533

Now you have a return style fuel system!
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457401533

Put your pump before the rail and the regulator after and you're golden!

If I got anything wrong feel free to let me know and I'll fix it.

Braineack 03-09-2016 03:11 PM

1 Attachment(s)
is this what your Engine Hoist looks like?


https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457554314

ajay842 03-09-2016 09:06 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Haha more like this

https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457575578

shuiend 03-10-2016 08:10 AM

What car is that motor in? I cannot fathom why you would have to cut out the firewall for a VVT motor.

Oscar 03-10-2016 08:24 AM

I would have used a liquid sealant instead of tape to seal the threads.

ajay842 03-10-2016 09:42 AM


Originally Posted by shuiend (Post 1314722)
What car is that motor in? I cannot fathom why you would have to cut out the firewall for a VVT motor.

It's going in a 1981 Toyota Starlet






Originally Posted by Oscar (Post 1314723)
I would have used a liquid sealant instead of tape to seal the threads.

Added it to the diy.

Wino 03-10-2016 08:34 PM

6 Attachment(s)
I used a different approach. It required deleting the VTCS, which I wanted gone anyway.
99 fuel rail off eBay, Turbosmart TS-0402-1002 Fuel Rail Adapter for Toyota/Subaru (trust me this is the right one), Russel -6 AN to rail adapter fitting PN:644110, Earl's PN:165056ERL to convert the supply hard line to -6 AN. NPT to -AN elbow. Various -AN hose ends. Ran the high pressure supply side in -6AN braided hose. Return side (downstream of the regulator) is clamped injector hose. This approach did require some clearance grinding on the intake manifold, but not a lot. I have photos of the clearance grinds as well.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457660057


https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457660057


https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457660057

Deathtrap13 03-12-2016 12:12 PM

I know its a little bit more off topic, but does anybody know If a set of NC (2006-15) miata injectors have the same head/nozzle size as the ports for our injectors?

I am thinking about buying a set of grams/skunk2 injectors from a guy. I know the tophats are different, and I can get those, but I dont know if the injector body/nozzle/head will seat into our port

I have a 2005 MSM. And the injector kit he bought was for an NC...but being that they are EV14 injectors i think that the injector body would be the same and the wires and top hats are just different

Sorry I didnt want to make a new thread just for a "yes/no" question, and i cant find anyone chatting about it.

And i saw brain posted here. I feel like he may know

aidandj 03-12-2016 01:10 PM

Those compression fittings you used there are only good to like 50psi

curly 03-12-2016 01:27 PM


Originally Posted by aidandj (Post 1315211)
Those compression fittings you used there are only good to like 50psi

OP or Wino?

The much easier method of this is described in the VVT swap thread, just buy a 99 rail and bolt on a 90-97 fpr. Without an in-line FPR, the OP's method would result in an unregulated fuel pressure. But if you are using an aftermarket FPR, it's a nice use of the dozen or so NB2 fuel rails I have...

aidandj 03-12-2016 01:28 PM

Wino. The Earl's compression fittings to the hard-line.

ajay842 03-12-2016 07:52 PM


Originally Posted by curly (Post 1315214)
OP or Wino?

The much easier method of this is described in the VVT swap thread, just buy a 99 rail and bolt on a 90-97 fpr. Without an in-line FPR, the OP's method would result in an unregulated fuel pressure. But if you are using an aftermarket FPR, it's a nice use of the dozen or so NB2 fuel rails I have...

Doesn't the NA regulator set for a lower psi then what the NB2 engine needs? I do have a regulator right after the new rail outlet.

curly 03-12-2016 08:43 PM

Yes, 43.5psi vs. 60psi. I guess I assumed an aftermarket ECU was being used. In which case you could just tune for the loss of 16.5psi of fuel.

Wino 03-12-2016 09:18 PM


Originally Posted by aidandj (Post 1315215)
Wino. The Earl's compression fittings to the hard-line.

It's rated to 250 psi on aluminum tubing. Now, my hard line isn't aluminum, but it's soft. I don't actually know the hard line material, probably a copper/steel alloy. I actually found this fitting conversion on several user threads in the forum and decided to go with it. Sometimes our needs force us to use less than ideal solutions. The high pressure side of the system, excluding the fuel rail was pressure tested at 125% of operating pressure for four hours with no pressure loss, so I'm reasonably confident in it. Heck, I'm still running hose on barb at the back end, but I plan to upgrade it later.

I went through the VVT swap thread pretty thoroughly before I made my final plan. I went with the adjustable FPR for more future flexibility.

Onyxyth 03-12-2016 10:42 PM


Originally Posted by Wino (Post 1315262)
It's rated to 250 psi on aluminum tubing. Now, my hard line isn't aluminum, but it's soft. I don't actually know the hard line material, probably a copper/steel alloy. I actually found this fitting conversion on several user threads in the forum and decided to go with it. Sometimes our needs force us to use less than ideal solutions. The high pressure side of the system, excluding the fuel rail was pressure tested at 125% of operating pressure for four hours with no pressure loss, so I'm reasonably confident in it. Heck, I'm still running hose on barb at the back end, but I plan to upgrade it later.

I went through the VVT swap thread pretty thoroughly before I made my final plan. I went with the adjustable FPR for more future flexibility.

See this is why I'm not sure what to do with my fuel lines. Our hard lines are steel, and those adapters are only rated for aluminum. Some also only list 50 psi, which is way under what the line would see in boost. It had me a bit worried, so I haven't bought anything yet.

I guess the best thing would be testing the system at pressure like you did.

Wino 03-13-2016 12:25 AM

My chief concern with the entire system is that there's no good way to pre-test it under dynamic load. I'm happy with the pressure test and all, but how will it hold up when things start moving around and vibrating? Mines a prepared class autocross car, so it's going to see <100 miles/year. It's going to see tons of stress during those miles. Only time will tell. I've spent a lot of time fretting over my fuel lines. Are they going to rub? Is there too much strain in this bend? Did I leave enough room for this and that to flex under load? On and on. Being on fire is not on my top 10 list of things I want to do.

Chooofoojoo 03-13-2016 04:48 PM

4 Attachment(s)
I have the same Earl's compression fittings on my lines a la Soviet and Hustler method. I'm torn as Soviet hasn't seemed to have had any issues with his Earl's fittings and IIRC he runs lots of base pressure on ID1000s with ALLOFIT boost reference.

I've been thinking of doing the inverted 37° flare / spacer and B-nut option and AN5 -> AN6 union. Honda guys seem to do this a lot on their steel fuel lines.


https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457902119
+
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457902119
+
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457902119
+
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457902119

aidandj 03-13-2016 04:56 PM


Originally Posted by Chooofoojoo (Post 1315360)
I have the same Earl's compression fittings on my lines a la Soviet and Hustler method. I'm torn as Soviet hasn't seemed to have had any issues with his Earl's fittings and IIRC he runs lots of base pressure on ID1000s with ALLOFIT boost reference.

I've been thinking of doing the inverted 37° flare / spacer and B-nut option and AN5 -> AN6 union. Honda guys seem to do this a lot on their steel fuel lines.


https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457902119
+
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457902119
+
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457902119
+
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1457902119

This is the "correct" way to do it.

swimming108 03-17-2016 05:03 PM

[QUOTE=Wino;1314893]I used a different approach. It required deleting the VTCS, which I wanted gone anyway.
99 fuel rail off eBay, Turbosmart TS-0402-1002 Fuel Rail Adapter for Toyota/Subaru (trust me this is the right one), Russel -6 AN to rail adapter fitting PN:644110, Earl's PN:165056ERL to convert the supply hard line to -6 AN. NPT to -AN elbow. Various -AN hose ends. Ran the high pressure supply side in -6AN braided hose. Return side (downstream of the regulator) is clamped injector hose. This approach did require some clearance grinding on the intake manifold, but not a lot. I have photos of the clearance grinds as well.
QUOTE]

Thank you!
This is exactly what I have been looking for to complete my fuel system!!!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:16 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands