E85 and boost, what compression ratio could I run?
I've run 38 PSI boost on my 9:1 motor without any detonation on E85.
My previous motor was 10.5:1 compression, and had a lot more low end, and I swear even more top end at a given boost level. Admittedly, I never ran that motor past 22-23 PSI though. Just wondering, I have a spare motor and was curious how much higher I could go on compression with E85 and the same high boost? 11:1? 12:1? more? |
Hahah, you are NUTS dude. Nuts.
|
9:1 static at 38psi is 32.27:1
11:1 static at 38psi is 39.44:1 12:1 static at 38psi is 43.02I was trying to find information on the flash point and other info on E85 to help you further, but I suck. I could only find anecdotal evidence for static compression ratios used succesfully on E85. |
12.5 or more if you can find the pistons
|
There was a guy selling some 13:1 pistons here a while ago. Idk if they ever sold.
|
Ive got 2 builds at just under 12:1 at over 25psi.
Both are awesome and not even close to knock. Dann |
I could even share timing tables if anyone wanted.
Dann |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1351976)
12.5 or more if you can find the pistons
--Ian |
Originally Posted by nitrodann
(Post 1351996)
I could even share timing tables if anyone wanted.
Dann |
10:1 and 25psi is 20 degrees safe as houses.
|
Could you post a screen shot of your timing table
|
When I get to work.
|
Ok thank you sir
|
I'd love seeing some spark tables you guys are running. I had no idea you could get away with those kind of compression ratios with that much boost on E85.
|
corn loves compression. and there's rarely any knock, if ever. and you can run astronomical boost and timing.
but you really have to keep in mind that despite not being det limited, there is such a thing as too much timing, and that you are putting crazy stress on your engine when you're well past MBT. But yeah, this might be a good place to discuss/share spark maps on e85 |
I feel sad that I am sitting here with an 8.6:1 motor with dreams of e85/flex
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1352194)
you really have to keep in mind that despite not being det limited, there is such a thing as too much timing, and that you are putting crazy stress on your engine when you're well past MBT.
--Ian |
Ok here is my map currently. This is by no means a good or great map, it is not dyno tuned and it needs work in several places and needs smoothing out I'm sure. I am not a tuning expert but trying my best to learn. It's what I've come up with based on other e85 maps and also driving around with electronic det cans and monitoring knock via MS3. I have not seen or heard any knock at all and I think that this timing map is still somewhat conservative and has plenty of room for improvement, thus why I'd like to see what others are running with high compression, high boost and e85. I'll get it to a dyno someday. But for now I'd just like to see if I'm somewhat close to what others are running. Any help and feedback is welcome. This is with 84mm 10.5:1 wiseco pistons, diy ported and polished 99 bp4w head and a relatively big turbo that hits late.
https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mia...366c844589.png |
Can't speek on the boosted cells, but that is less agressive in the 100KPa and under cells than I am running on my 1.6 with 87 octane....
|
Yeah, you can run way more.
19kpa cruise should be 40* taper to 100kpa should be at least 27-30* taper to 230kpa 16* is ok but should not be dropping, should be ramping up to redline, to at least 20* Assuming built engine, competent setup, and at least e70 actual in tank, preferably 80+ |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1351976)
12.5 or more if you can find the pistons
Originally Posted by nitrodann
(Post 1351995)
Ive got 2 builds at just under 12:1 at over 25psi.
Both are awesome and not even close to knock. Dann Dann, how much over 25psi? 26, 30, more? |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1352254)
Yeah, you can run way more.
19kpa cruise should be 40* taper to 100kpa should be at least 27-30* taper to 230kpa 16* is ok but should not be dropping, should be ramping up to redline, to at least 20* Assuming built engine, competent setup, and at least e70 actual in tank, preferably 80+ https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mia...b7c32f415b.png |
Much better.
|
Originally Posted by patsmx5
(Post 1352291)
Thanks. I was thinking around 12:1 or so if I make the switch.
Dann, how much over 25psi? 26, 30, more? I didnt get to the tuning laptop today also guys |
Originally Posted by nitrodann
(Post 1352415)
Yeah 26-27
I didnt get to the tuning laptop today also guys |
Maybe, Im just picking numbers by memory.
Ill show you the exact map. Dann |
Yep better, and make sure your AFR's aren't dipping below 11.8 or you might get misfires from that too. You've still room for more advance too, this is on the conservative side
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1352437)
Yep better, and make sure your AFR's aren't dipping below 11.8 or you might get misfires from that too. You've still room for more advance too, this is on the conservative side
|
nah it's probably fine at 11.8, but once you start dippin lower by too much, you'll start losing spark. you're pumping ~30% more of the stuff into your cylinders, it overwhelms the spark
|
Even while running boss d585 coils and a reasonable spark plug gap?
|
with those you're likely fine, but I'd still run 12:1 on the dot cause it should be a wee bit faster and waste less fuel.
On Ryan's built 1.6 we could only go up to 21-22psi due to weak spark, but we still ran 20* midrange tapering up to 30* up top. that car put down 360whp on a 1.6 and a log manifold and a chinacharger. we've done BP4W's similarly and it was over 400whp. the stuff is pretty nuts |
Pat I think you're capable enough that I can remind you to disregard static, and focus on dynamic compression ratio. If you fuck up and end up with too much static, so you have to pull so much spark it makes less power fix it is just a cam timing adjustment away.
|
Originally Posted by Leafy
(Post 1352674)
Pat I think you're capable enough that I can remind you to disregard static, and focus on dynamic compression ratio. If you fuck up and end up with too much static, so you have to pull so much spark it makes less power fix it is just a cam timing adjustment away.
I run 17* @ 38 PSI with no knock. Not going higher till I get it on a dyno. |
Year long bump. I searched the forum to see if anyone is running high compression + boost, and found my own thread discussing this...
Getting bored, thinking of putting together a new shortblock to experiment with some things. One being high compression. Current thought is to try AT LEAST 12:1 with E85/Boost. Actually thinking about going to 13:1 or even 14:1 and see what happens. Would have to get custom pistons made to do this, looking into that now. :eek3: |
YES!! do it for science.
Although a local buddy of mine is running 12:1 already on a miata that traps 132mph currently. So you gotta go higher to blaze new trails :likecat: |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1437840)
YES!! do it for science.
Although a local buddy of mine is running 12:1 already on a miata that traps 132mph currently. So you gotta go higher to blaze new trails :likecat: I am tempted to go higher. |
Yes, Yes, cornjuice of course. It's been at least a year and I wann say a couple dozen passes? I'll ask him to chime in or at least fwd me the details. but he beats on it like a redheaded stepchild very very often. this is by no means a garage queen
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1437844)
Yes, Yes, cornjuice of course. It's been at least a year and I wann say a couple dozen passes? I'll ask him to chime in or at least fwd me the details. but he beats on it like a redheaded stepchild very very often. this is by no means a garage queen
|
I run 11:1 with 9psi with a Rotrex on E85. The cams have shorter seat timing than stock further bumping static compression, Not extreme but it is a track car that gets flogged hard!
I suggest you start from the top and work your way backwards. Determine whatever you plan to run (15-20-25psi) to meet your HP goals and then fill in the compression that keeps your dynamic numbers sane. Somewhere around 18:1 is what I shoot for. I have another marque I build using the same formula. Been running 10+ years strong on the street with some track days sprinkled in. This is a pretty good tool to help you play with some numbers. Wallace Racing: Dynamic Compression Ratio Calculator The extra compression buys you more HP per PSI of boost. The motor tends to be much more lively in transient phases and just rips WOT. Good Luck Pat! |
Originally Posted by k24madness
(Post 1437936)
I run 11:1 with 9psi with a Rotrex on E85. The cams have shorter seat timing than stock further bumping static compression, Not extreme but it is a track car that gets flogged hard!
I suggest you start from the top and work your way backwards. Determine whatever you plan to run (15-20-25psi) to meet your HP goals and then fill in the compression that keeps your dynamic numbers sane. Somewhere around 18:1 is what I shoot for. I have another marque I build using the same formula. Been running 10+ years strong on the street with some track days sprinkled in. This is a pretty good tool to help you play with some numbers. Wallace Racing: Dynamic Compression Ratio Calculator The extra compression buys you more HP per PSI of boost. The motor tends to be much more lively in transient phases and just rips WOT. Good Luck Pat! 7.96 dynamic compression ratio 29.62 effective boost compression ratio. That is already significantly over your 18:1 sane numbers. If I ran 12:1 and 35 PSI boost: 10.57:1 dynamic compression ratio 35.74:1 effective boost compression ratio. |
run 15:1 and 30psi. For science
|
I genuinely wonder how high you can go on a dinky BP head before you run into serious issues
|
1 Attachment(s)
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1437999)
I genuinely wonder how high you can go on a dinky BP head before you run into serious issues
LOL on the rods! |
e85 does knock/detonate with enough craziness thrown at it, so there's that.
and then there are the physical load limits you mentioned |
Originally Posted by patsmx5
(Post 1437995)
Using your calculator, my current setup with 84mm bore, 85mm stroke, 5.233" rods, 9:1 compression, 50* ABDC inlet valve timing, and 40 PSI boost, I get
7.96 dynamic compression ratio 29.62 effective boost compression ratio. That is already significantly over your 18:1 sane numbers. If I ran 12:1 and 35 PSI boost: 10.57:1 dynamic compression ratio 35.74:1 effective boost compression ratio. At 20 psi you're at 18.77 dynamic with the same above info. Again just my target on race gas or E85 in a highly stressed environment. YMMV. In for results. |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1438010)
e85 does knock/detonate with enough craziness thrown at it, so there's that.
and then there are the physical load limits you mentioned
Originally Posted by k24madness
(Post 1438057)
That's beyond where I would be comfortable. Kudos for boosting "All of it".
At 20 psi you're at 18.77 dynamic with the same above info. Again just my target on race gas or E85 in a highly stressed environment. YMMV. In for results. So if you consider 18:1 safe for track, and I have gotten away with 29.62:1 effective compression ratio, that is quite a difference. Do you think you could run more boost, or more compression on your setup? |
I know this thread is about high comp and e85 but there is also some good info about high(er) boost levels and e85. I want to add some timing to my map but a lot of timing tables that Ive found are all for lower boost numbers.
I hit 22psi at ~4700rpm and it tapers up to 25-26psi by 7250. E85, stock 9.5:1 pistons, stock rings, stock head. My current WOT, full boost timing numbers are highlighted in the picture. Could I safely add 4-5 degrees in all the cells? https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.mia...daeb1fac9a.png |
no such thing as a definitive answer to that. assuming you don't start knocking, and don't stop picking up significant power per degree of timing, you might. I have on several cars in the past
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands