Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Honda 3.5L V6 swap

Old 07-06-2014, 12:55 PM
  #1  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
 
JasonC SBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,420
Total Cats: 84
Default Honda 3.5L V6 swap

No discussion yet of this?:

https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/fo...e/88114/page1/

I really like the concept.
JasonC SBB is offline  
Old 07-06-2014, 06:09 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

What does the J35 do thats worth the extra weight over the K series?
Leafy is offline  
Old 07-06-2014, 07:07 PM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
gearhead_318's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,966
Total Cats: 21
Default

Whats the advantage of this? The LS1 is lighter then the J35 series by at least 150 lbs. It weighs in at 5550-575 according to Honda Tuning.
J35/J37 Engine Weight - Honda-Tech
gearhead_318 is offline  
Old 07-06-2014, 07:24 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
asmasm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: durham NC
Posts: 792
Total Cats: 143
Default

Originally Posted by gearhead_318
Whats the advantage of this? The LS1 is lighter then the J35 series by at least 150 lbs. It weighs in at 5550-575 according to Honda Tuning.
J35/J37 Engine Weight - Honda-Tech
Ouch- I'll take a 240 whp k24 over that engine any day.
asmasm is offline  
Old 07-06-2014, 07:46 PM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Default

Originally Posted by gearhead_318
Whats the advantage of this?[/URL]
It sticks out of the hood of a civic and "makes so much power and torque stock, no need for mods bro, its stock, ****** stock and ****** fast, bro."

Attached Thumbnails Honda 3.5L V6 swap-4399465385_a17ca6d73e_b.jpg  
Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline  
Old 07-06-2014, 09:08 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
glade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: albion, mi
Posts: 319
Total Cats: 17
Default

Originally Posted by gearhead_318
Whats the advantage of this? The LS1 is lighter then the J35 series by at least 150 lbs. It weighs in at 5550-575 according to Honda Tuning.
J35/J37 Engine Weight - Honda-Tech
And in that article it said that the weight includes transmission, drive axles, all accessories, ect.

Even cast iron v6's with superchargers (l67) are under 500 pounds
glade is offline  
Old 07-06-2014, 09:48 PM
  #7  
Elite Member
 
codrus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 5,165
Total Cats: 855
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
What does the J35 do thats worth the extra weight over the K series?
My understanding is that the vendor says:

- More tq/power than NA K series. 50-100 pounds more weight, but that's similar to what you'd gain with a turbo on the K series.
- Much cheaper and more available than K24 in junkyard. (claim is sub $500 for complete motor)

Compared to moderate turbo BP (2560 with FM kit or the like):

- Similar power/torque
- Uses factory tranny, so no expense/hassle with the tranny, PPF, etc.
- Supposedly more reliable on track (no backing out studs, fewer cooling issues, etc).

Basically it's an alternative to a moderate turbo BP that costs less and delivers NA power rather than boost for less cost than an FM2. Harder to smog if you live in a **** state like CA, though.

Kits aren't shipping yet, so this could all be vaporware.

--Ian
codrus is offline  
Old 07-06-2014, 11:32 PM
  #8  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

I thought the J35 only made like 10 more hp than a the good stock K24, and the k24 can hit 300hp N/A pretty easily. I'm still not seeing it.
Leafy is offline  
Old 07-07-2014, 03:29 AM
  #9  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,947
Total Cats: 1,002
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
I thought the J35 only made like 10 more hp than a the good stock K24, and the k24 can hit 300hp N/A pretty easily. I'm still not seeing it.
Seriously? I mean are you even trying here?

WHICH k24? WHICH J35? The work you'd do to the K24 to get to 300 whp would get you a long ways on a J motor.

Not that i'm interested in the swap. But come on.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 07-07-2014, 07:19 AM
  #10  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,490
Total Cats: 4,079
Default

needs more h22!
Braineack is offline  
Old 07-07-2014, 07:31 AM
  #11  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Originally Posted by turbofan
Seriously? I mean are you even trying here?

WHICH k24? WHICH J35? The work you'd do to the K24 to get to 300 whp would get you a long ways on a J motor.

Not that i'm interested in the swap. But come on.
The normal K24A2 once its swapped into a car should be around 240hp (200 stock) The common J35Ax seems to make about 255 with bolt ons like a swap would have and has about 210hp stock. Now there are some J35Zs that make 271hp stock but they are only 08+ and arent in minivans so they're going to cost a bunch more money to get and you're going to have to do more work to deal with the drive by wire.
Leafy is offline  
Old 07-07-2014, 10:14 AM
  #12  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

the comment "get you a long ways on a J motor" is silly, because the J is a turd not worth polishing. its not revvy, its not high flowing, its not uber reliable, its not light.....its not........anything
this swap is probably for those that want to be different

Maybe I'm missing something.

Last edited by 18psi; 07-07-2014 at 10:36 AM.
18psi is offline  
Old 07-07-2014, 10:22 AM
  #13  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Efini~FC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,309
Total Cats: 98
Default

J35 at 7200 rpms with a proper exhaust is teh secks...

Behind k powered cars, the other cars I've raced the most are/were j-powered. The TL-S I raced made 260whp on NASA's dyno with an intake, exhaust, and reflash. 100% internally stocked, revved to 7500rpm for literally years. The motor currently in the car (and still being raced) has done two NASA 25 hours, three or four VIR 13 hour races , plus ~ 6 years of sprint racing. And I zinged the sh*t out of it more than once.

I think this swap could be amaze ballz
Efini~FC3S is offline  
Old 07-07-2014, 10:29 AM
  #14  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Someone bought this out of the junkyard on Friday for $175. Just sayin'.

Attached Thumbnails Honda 3.5L V6 swap-20140704_094254.jpg  
concealer404 is offline  
Old 07-07-2014, 11:43 AM
  #15  
Supporting Vendor
 
KMiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 635
Total Cats: 322
Default

Cool idea for a swap, obviously I’m a big fan of Honda engines. We’re biased to the K series obviously, but more options are always good

Can anyone point me to some details about the trans and diff they used?
__________________
KPower Industries
Home of the original KMiata Swap




K24 NC swap is coming in 2024! Learn more

info@kpower.industries
Follow us on Facebook and Instagram







KMiata is offline  
Old 07-07-2014, 11:45 AM
  #16  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

They're using Miata stuff like you are.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 07-07-2014, 11:53 AM
  #17  
Elite Member
 
Sparetire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,642
Total Cats: 36
Default

Originally Posted by gearhead_318
Whats the advantage of this? The LS1 is lighter then the J35 series by at least 150 lbs. It weighs in at 5550-575 according to Honda Tuning.
J35/J37 Engine Weight - Honda-Tech
Except that it does not make near the TQ, so it does not need a massive T-56 or 4L80/4L60 and a Ford 8.8, which is why it ends up about 100 LBs lighter than an LS1 and costs a ton less to do. The LSX is god, but it requires a ton of relatively heavy, relatively expensive stuff to work in a Miata. T-56s are fricken expensive and probably always will be.

If I was pricing this out and I was not fabbing my own parts, I think I could live with ~100LbFt less TQ if it saved me many thousands and a lot of work. If I wanted a 450WHP car on the other hand, yeah, I would not be going with this.

tl;dr Swaps like this make sense if you don't want to replace the whole driveline because they are lighter and they cost many thousands less. Personally I think for me the only ways I would go would be turbo BP , LSX, or maybe K. But a 3.5L making mid to high 200s HP for 6 grand or so is far from the worst value proposition I have seen with these cars. Frankly an LSX Miata makes less and less sense as C5s in good shape get more and more attainable.
Sparetire is offline  
Old 07-07-2014, 11:58 AM
  #18  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Originally Posted by Sparetire
Except that it does not make near the TQ, so it does not need a massive T-56 or 4L80/4L60 and a Ford 8.8, which is why it ends up about 100 LBs lighter than an LS1 and costs a ton less to do. The LSX is god, but it requires a ton of relatively heavy, relatively expensive stuff to work in a Miata. T-56s are fricken expensive and probably always will be.

If I was pricing this out and I was not fabbing my own parts, I think I could live with ~100LbFt less TQ if it saved me many thousands and a lot of work. If I wanted a 450WHP car on the other hand, yeah, I would not be going with this.

tl;dr Swaps like this make sense if you don't want to replace the whole driveline because they are lighter and they cost many thousands less. Personally I think for me the only ways I would go would be turbo BP , LSX, or maybe K. But a 3.5L making mid to high 200s HP for 6 grand or so is far from the worst value proposition I have seen with these cars. Frankly an LSX Miata makes less and less sense as C5s in good shape get more and more attainable.
I still dont understand the OMG NEED for super crazy diff with the LSx how many of them are really making more torque than soviet's EFR setup or bundy? I'm willing to bet that 90% of the LS swaps would be perfectly fine with an MSM diff and axles. And if you really want to be a weight weenie there's always the gforce geasets for the T5 that should handle the power that most LS swaps put out, sure it ends up costing a grand more than the T56, but you are saving that much by not running an 8.8 or 7.5 rear end.
Leafy is offline  
Old 07-07-2014, 12:01 PM
  #19  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

soviet and bundy are not popping diffs cause they're popping transmissions. at least bundy is, as is anyone else driving like a man in a 350+ car
18psi is offline  
Old 07-07-2014, 12:06 PM
  #20  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
thenuge26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,267
Total Cats: 239
Default

Once TurboTim gets into serious boost we'll see, he's got a T5 with the stock diff IIRC.
thenuge26 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Honda 3.5L V6 swap



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07 PM.