Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Honda 3.5L V6 swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2015, 02:37 PM
  #161  
Senior Member
 
Roda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 1,191
Total Cats: 294
Default

Originally Posted by Norm at Superfastmiatas

The rack and pinion is lowered approx .625" and has minimal bump steer in a firm stock height setup. Lowering the car considerably amplifies it somewhat. I have developed a rack offset kit that eliminates bump steer and actually be adjusted to give better steer characteristics in lowered cars. I will eventually add it to the kit."
This cracks me up...
Roda is offline  
Old 04-07-2015, 03:15 PM
  #162  
Newb
 
jakeordie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cordycord
I bet the weight would actually be LESS than a turbo or Rotrex car
I noticed they updated the FAQ on their website.

After converting our 1999 Miata to Honda V6 power using our JV6 Kit, the total car weight gain was 9 pounds.
jakeordie is offline  
Old 04-07-2015, 03:19 PM
  #163  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,951
Total Cats: 1,004
Default

Taking an NB with PS and A/C, then in the end having a J car without PS and AC?

I still just don't get the point. I truly don't understand why one would go with these V6 swaps--J or LFX--instead of an LS V8.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 04-07-2015, 03:23 PM
  #164  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Price, and a penchant for mediocrity.

(Though honestly, the LFX somewhat intrigues me.)
concealer404 is offline  
Old 04-07-2015, 03:25 PM
  #165  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,951
Total Cats: 1,004
Default

Sure the LFX swap is cool. But by the time you get the whole drivetrain and CTS rear, what are you saving? You're buying the same parts, are you not? Subframe, mounts, rear diff, engine and trans.

I can hear the cost argument for the J I guess, the engine is much cheaper.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 04-07-2015, 03:27 PM
  #166  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Default

I think the LFX would be cool because it may be short enough to allow a turbo or two in there, and you know the engine/trans could take it.

Nothing makes sense about a J swap. Nothing.
There is nothing spectacular about the engine. Even if there was a cheap, strong transmission behind it, the power potential is not impressive.
Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline  
Old 04-07-2015, 03:27 PM
  #167  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

Originally Posted by turbofan
Sure the LFX swap is cool. But by the time you get the whole drivetrain and CTS rear, what are you saving? You're buying the same parts, are you not? Subframe, mounts, rear diff, engine and trans.

I can hear the cost argument for the J I guess, the engine is much cheaper.

You're saving weight. Weight is what you're saving.

People are using the T56 behind the LFX? That seems like overkill.

The engine isn't the biggest cost of any of these swaps. The J-swap's real budget darling aspect comes from using a stock trans, driveshaft, and rear end.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 04-07-2015, 04:39 PM
  #168  
Junior Member
 
Voltwings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 57
Total Cats: 4
Default

Weight and balance. As cool as it would be, my miata doesnt "need" 400 whp to be competitive at a few of our local tracks. Quite contrary, i feel it would be putting me at a slight disadvantage if anything.
Voltwings is offline  
Old 04-07-2015, 06:57 PM
  #169  
Senior Member
 
Roda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 1,191
Total Cats: 294
Default

Originally Posted by turbofan
Sure the LFX swap is cool. But by the time you get the whole drivetrain and CTS rear, what are you saving? You're buying the same parts, are you not? Subframe, mounts, rear diff, engine and trans.
LFX motor and trans can be had for around, or less than the cost of a used T-56, so it is quite a bit cheaper than an LS swap. Also, less firewall fab. If you just want a fun street/HPDE car, and are OK with 300hp with stock reliability, it's a viable option. Easier on tires and brake pads as well.
Roda is offline  
Old 04-08-2015, 11:47 AM
  #170  
Elite Member
 
Sparetire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,642
Total Cats: 36
Default

Originally Posted by concealer404
The engine isn't the biggest cost of any of these swaps. The J-swap's real budget darling aspect comes from using a stock trans, driveshaft, and rear end.
Bingo.

LSXs require the whole damned driveline to be changed. Its more cost and more work. Stupid T-56 and TR60606 prices are stupid. Looking at what you pay and what you get, a used C5 starts looking good.

K swaps, J swaps, and Turbo/Supers let you keep the stock driveline (as compromised as it is). And that's cheaper. The K swap is probably about the same cost as a DIY-as-**** LSX with a lot less fab. And you get a lower weight than the LSX. And really quality components. Probably a ton easier to work on in the engine bay too. Your spring rates don't need to be fuxored with much either.

But, your still putting more into the swap than you put into the car.

So the search for the Unicorn cheap path to 300WHP continues for low-ball low-brow schmuks like me.

I honestly suspect that in the end its going to be a Rotrex kit and fueling parts. 5.5Kish for 300WHP, not counting clutch, wheels/tires, torsen, 6 speed, etc.
Sparetire is offline  
Old 04-08-2015, 12:23 PM
  #171  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

I'd say Rotrex is the cheapest and reasonably reliable path to 300whp as well.

Well... the cheapest and reasonably reliable one that makes SENSE, at least. I could put an F2T in a miata and make 300whp for quite a bit less, but nobody actually wants to drive an F2T powered Miata.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 04-08-2015, 12:40 PM
  #172  
Senior Member
 
Roda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 1,191
Total Cats: 294
Default

Originally Posted by Sparetire

I honestly suspect that in the end its going to be a Rotrex kit and fueling parts. 5.5Kish for 300WHP, not counting clutch, wheels/tires, torsen, 6 speed, etc.
Plus a long block that can take it...

Don't get me wrong, if I stick with a Miata motor, it will be a 1.8 Rotrex. But you're still looking at $7-8k on the low end to do it right.

I like the LFX a lot, but I'd like to see a few complete swaps running for a while to get some feedback before I take the leap.
Roda is offline  
Old 04-08-2015, 12:41 PM
  #173  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

I thought we established that a 300whp Rotrex setup on a stock BP might hold together because the torque will be low and come on nicely.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 04-08-2015, 12:45 PM
  #174  
Senior Member
 
Roda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 1,191
Total Cats: 294
Default

I guess it depends on whether 'might' is the level of reliability you're looking for...
Roda is offline  
Old 04-08-2015, 02:25 PM
  #175  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,951
Total Cats: 1,004
Default

^this.

might hold together, but for track use? Not likely, not long term.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 04-08-2015, 02:27 PM
  #176  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
concealer404's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,917
Total Cats: 2,201
Default

I like to live dangerously.
concealer404 is offline  
Old 04-08-2015, 03:05 PM
  #177  
Elite Member
 
Sparetire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,642
Total Cats: 36
Default

I've had a semi-fubared 6 speed sitting on top of a slightly fubared refrigerator in my garage for nearly a year now. Why not a slightly fubared shortblock too? if stock goes boom, I have the other built and ready to go.

But that's a really good point: once you start building a BP and spending 4K on a SC kit, damn, its time to take a look at a K swap. Maybe it has less power, but 8K+ RPM is pretty damned fun. Because you're not going to get into a shortblock and just do rods and pistons, you will give in and do boundary pump, etc. Suddenly you just spent another 2K easy. On an engine that's basically a 1980s refugee. It'd be semi-custom, but Rotrexed K24s make lower-LSX power levels.

Its never simple.
Sparetire is offline  
Old 04-08-2015, 04:58 PM
  #178  
Senior Member
 
Roda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 1,191
Total Cats: 294
Default

I've actually come full circle and am looking at Ford smallblocks again. 350hp is easy, parts are cheap and everywhere (including T-5s). With aluminum heads, you're only giving up ~20-30lbs to an LSx, and you make that back in the transmission. MS has plug/play for the Ford harness. And they sound better than the LSx...

I'm a little biased, 'cause I drag raced a Fox Mustang back in the day (waaay back, actually), so I know the motors/transmissions.

But this is all getting pretty far off-topic of the J swap... just be happy that there are lots of options if you want 300+hp in a Miata. Too bad they're all about $10k by the time you have a reliable, track ready package...
Roda is offline  
Old 04-08-2015, 06:48 PM
  #179  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Leafy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: NH
Posts: 9,479
Total Cats: 104
Default

Damn, its too bad no one makes a mount kit for the MZR/Duratec. The NC2 2.0 and the 2.5 all can make 300+ safely. The 2.5s start at about $350 in the junk yard, and theres a t5 bellhousing that fits the motor.
Leafy is offline  
Old 04-08-2015, 07:00 PM
  #180  
Elite Member
 
Sparetire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,642
Total Cats: 36
Default

Originally Posted by Leafy
Damn, its too bad no one makes a mount kit for the MZR/Duratec. The NC2 2.0 and the 2.5 all can make 300+ safely. The 2.5s start at about $350 in the junk yard, and theres a t5 bellhousing that fits the motor.
The truth is that the NC will end up being the 'easy big power' of all the generations. Which sucks, because its way below an NB for me and jurys out on the ND save for the ***-end looking kinda terrible.
Sparetire is offline  


Quick Reply: Honda 3.5L V6 swap



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:21 PM.