Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Honda intake manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-25-2010, 02:56 PM
  #101  
Elite Member
iTrader: (51)
 
gospeed81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 7,257
Total Cats: 26
Default

^I was thinking about that exact same spot.

Going out to garage now to see if there is a point in the blox manifold where the spacing matches up.

Do you think the 10" runners will hit the powerband we're looking for?
gospeed81 is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 03:04 PM
  #102  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

honestly, no clue. there's a crazy math formula on honda-tech.com if you search.

here's what newbsauce's did for him:



lost a little spool, but everything past 5600RPM was better. I think we lost a little due to wastegate control, I'm pretty sure we can get it back, he was using a very small 7psi wastegate can that kept wanting to spike so we bleed off with the boost solenoid; since been replaced.

This was with his BEGi IM, IIRC 3x12" plenum, 9" runners, and 70mm TB.




We had ot remove his charcoal canister due to the runner length...intake plumb got interesting too:




lovely S-shape.
Braineack is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 03:10 PM
  #103  
Elite Member
iTrader: (51)
 
gospeed81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 7,257
Total Cats: 26
Default

Pretty much exactly what I plan on doing powerwise.

Looks like this manifold will set the throttlebody BACK...making it easier to make smooth coldside bends.

Good to see the 70mm throttle body isn't too much.

Any idea what the cheap hookup is on those that fit a honda mani?

I'd heard somebody say something about Mustang TBs, and wanted to check before I pulled the trigger on a stupid TB that cost as much as I spent on the stinkin' mani...
gospeed81 is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 03:20 PM
  #104  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

mustang TBs suck, the clockspring is WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY too light.

You have so many options with your honda flange...a B series TB can be had for $10 with the tps, iac, and map sensor and that's 60mm. For $59 it can be bore out to 68mm at maxbore.com and the linkage should work, the mustang linkage needs to be modded.
Braineack is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 03:22 PM
  #105  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
levnubhin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
Default

What size is the inlet on the Blox mani?
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
levnubhin is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 03:33 PM
  #106  
Elite Member
iTrader: (51)
 
gospeed81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 7,257
Total Cats: 26
Default

Looks like the Blox is 62mm, but I'm using tape and not calipers today. Will bring them home from work tomorrow.
gospeed81 is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 05:51 PM
  #107  
Guest
iTrader: (6)
 
M-Tuned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vaughan, On, Canada
Posts: 1,085
Total Cats: 1
Default

This is sooooo 2001 for me..

I used a bored out Honda T-Body when I did this. I beleieve it was 67.5mm when we were finished with it. I used the Honda TPS and no IAC.
M-Tuned is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 05:52 PM
  #108  
Guest
iTrader: (6)
 
M-Tuned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vaughan, On, Canada
Posts: 1,085
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
mustang TBs suck, the clockspring is WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY too light.
Yeah, they suck! When I used one on my BEGI manifold I ended up adding an extra spring to add some tension..
M-Tuned is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 05:59 PM
  #109  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
dc2696's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Edmonton Ab, Canada
Posts: 1,202
Total Cats: 21
Default

Originally Posted by Marc@M-Tuned.com
This is sooooo 2001 for me..

I used a bored out Honda T-Body when I did this. I beleieve it was 67.5mm when we were finished with it. I used the Honda TPS and no IAC.
Like I said, spill the beans on the old school set-up man lol
dc2696 is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 08:03 PM
  #110  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Fireindc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Taos, New mexico
Posts: 6,599
Total Cats: 561
Default

Originally Posted by dc2696
Like I said, spill the beans on the old school set-up man lol
+1, this thread needs more pics. Especially since its been done before!

Someone make these and sell them for a reasonable price with proven gains.
Fireindc is offline  
Old 01-25-2010, 08:06 PM
  #111  
Guest
iTrader: (6)
 
M-Tuned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vaughan, On, Canada
Posts: 1,085
Total Cats: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Fireindc
+1, this thread needs more pics. Especially since its been done before!

Someone make these and sell them for a reasonable price with proven gains.
That is the problem.. Making them for a reasonable price. Aluminum welding is not cheap, never mind you would need to have a flange made to weld them to.

I will try and find some old pictures of my setup.
M-Tuned is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 10:52 AM
  #112  
Elite Member
iTrader: (51)
 
gospeed81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 7,257
Total Cats: 26
Default

Speaking of price. If anybody else is thinking about this let me know.

I've got a line on a genuine Skunk2 that I found in my search. Guy got back to me and said $150. I could pick it up, and either ship it straight to you, or cut it and get it welded at the same time I do mine.


I'm waiting on Marc's pic before I start cutting runners. Will probably go his route pending review.
gospeed81 is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 12:55 PM
  #113  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

yes, I believe he does.
Braineack is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 01:47 PM
  #114  
Senior Member
 
apariah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NHR, TX
Posts: 538
Total Cats: -2
Default

What type of gains are you expecting to see on street driven miata? Is this something more for the track car than the daily driven.
apariah is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 02:02 PM
  #115  
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
levnubhin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Va Beach
Posts: 7,329
Total Cats: 12
Default

Originally Posted by apariah
What type of gains are you expecting to see on street driven miata? Is this something more for the track car than the daily driven.
More torque and power from 5-7,000 rpms.
__________________
Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
levnubhin is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 03:27 PM
  #116  
Elite Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Rafa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sunny Spanish speaking Non US Caribbean
Posts: 3,224
Total Cats: 3
Default

Originally Posted by Braineack
honestly, no clue. there's a crazy math formula on honda-tech.com if you search.

here's what newbsauce's did for him:



lost a little spool, but everything past 5600RPM was better. I think we lost a little due to wastegate control, I'm pretty sure we can get it back, he was using a very small 7psi wastegate can that kept wanting to spike so we bleed off with the boost solenoid; since been replaced.

This was with his BEGi IM, IIRC 3x12" plenum, 9" runners, and 70mm TB.




.

Originally Posted by levnubhin
More torque and power from 5-7,000 rpms.
Actually; when I look at newbsauce's dyno plot, it looks like the torque es lower.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Can someone explain it?

Thanks
Rafa is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 03:32 PM
  #117  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
miataspeed2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Connect-I-Cut
Posts: 1,404
Total Cats: 0
Default

Holds torque for longer instead of droping towards redline
miataspeed2005 is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 03:40 PM
  #118  
Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
johnmatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jax, Fl
Posts: 896
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by levnubhin
More torque and power from 5-7,000 rpms.
Nice new avatar
johnmatt is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 03:41 PM
  #119  
Elite Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Full_Tilt_Boogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 5,155
Total Cats: 406
Default

Originally Posted by Rafa
Actually; when I look at newbsauce's dyno plot, it looks like the torque es lower.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Can someone explain it?

Thanks
Terminology failure on youre part.

It does exactly what he said "more torque from 5-7k"

Youre using the word 'torque' to decribe torque only in the low RPM range, which is wrong and the result of a muscle car culture.
Full_Tilt_Boogie is offline  
Old 01-26-2010, 03:42 PM
  #120  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,493
Total Cats: 4,080
Default

Originally Posted by miataspeed2005
Holds torque for longer instead of droping towards redline

^^ this. It's not about peak TQ in his case, but the extra top end HP from incresed tq after 5K. Yes, he lost 10 peak TQ during spool, but gained about 20 ft-lbs at redline, increasing his HP 30 points at 7000RPM.

and we did it with less timing, and less averaged boost.
Braineack is offline  


Quick Reply: Honda intake manifold



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 PM.