Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Stock ecu AFRs, how bad were yours pre-tuning?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2016, 04:01 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vteckiller2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 824
Total Cats: 64
Default Stock ecu AFRs, how bad were yours pre-tuning?

Just about to wrap up the megasquirt install and I got to thinking, how much worse is my open loop AFR compared to others? I saw Emilio in an older thread quote the worst he has seen is 12.5:1 on stock ecu. I see around 11.5 in the mid range tapering to about 10.2 at redline. Lots of breathing mods, but stock BP5A ecu.

How bad were your AFR's on a stock ecu?
vteckiller2000 is offline  
Old 02-24-2016, 04:11 PM
  #2  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

The last few people that observed oem ecu afr's on an nb seem to have observed the same: pig rich up top, mid 11's to mid 12's midrange, and stoich pre 3k or something

search scenturions posts, he did testing on this and posted plots IIRC
18psi is offline  
Old 02-24-2016, 05:07 PM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (17)
 
pdexta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 2,949
Total Cats: 182
Default

It's been a really long time since I put a wideband on a stock miata but I was remembering it dropping to 11:1 at anything over 4000rpms.

I did a 2hr drive at 90mph with the top down in a stock 10AE and got like 14mpg.
pdexta is offline  
Old 02-24-2016, 05:14 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vteckiller2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 824
Total Cats: 64
Default

Originally Posted by pdexta
It's been a really long time since I put a wideband on a stock miata but I was remembering it dropping to 11:1 at anything over 4000rpms.

I did a 2hr drive at 90mph with the top down in a stock 10AE and got like 14mpg.
Mine is pretty far into the "pig rich" area, and my cruising rpm at 80 is almost 4500 rpm (6 speed and 4.30). I can get in the mid 20's cruising, but it all goes to hell with hard driving.

I am basically just curious if the old "more airflow mods makes it richer on stock ecu" is true or if I made poor choices with modifications.
vteckiller2000 is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 02-24-2016, 05:21 PM
  #5  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

more airflow on stock ecu should cause it to lean out.
if you're richening up, it's more indicative of losing power or not gaining any.
for the most part
18psi is offline  
Old 02-25-2016, 12:07 AM
  #6  
Ben
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Ben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: atlanta-ish
Posts: 12,659
Total Cats: 134
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
more airflow on stock ecu should cause it to lean out.
if you're richening up, it's more indicative of losing power or not gaining any.
for the most part
Or possibly moving to a different, more poorly tuned part of a table(s).

Mazda's never done a good job at tuning. Miata, MSM, and RX8 are all pretty bad, even with a MAF. I'll try not to hate on earlier stuff with AFMs too much as the metering is poor, but I'll just say that the OE system as a whole on the pre MAF leaves a lot to be desired.
__________________
Chief of Floor Sweeping, DIYAutoTune.com & AMP EFI
Crew Chief, Car Owner & Least Valuable Driver, HongNorrthRacing

91 Turbo | 10AE Turbo | 01 Track Rat | #323 Mazda Champcar

Originally Posted by concealer404
Buy an MSPNP Pro, you'll feel better.
Ben is offline  
Old 02-25-2016, 02:11 AM
  #7  
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
curly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 14,181
Total Cats: 1,131
Default

I've got a dyno of my completely stock nb2 making 107hp I can post tomorrow. Only mod was a mazdaspeed muffler.
curly is offline  
Old 02-25-2016, 09:05 AM
  #8  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

with afr plot?
18psi is offline  
Old 02-25-2016, 09:20 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
 
Forrest95M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 452
Total Cats: 21
Default

My bone stock, no breather mods at all, 95 with a BPE9 hit its 14.7 at idle, 15.3 at cruise, and 11-12 up top. Seemed like it kept it running pretty nice
Forrest95M is offline  
Old 02-25-2016, 09:50 AM
  #10  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

I'm curious what the oem ecu triggers around half throttle
anyone try this?
18psi is offline  
Old 02-25-2016, 10:29 AM
  #11  
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
curly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 14,181
Total Cats: 1,131
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
with afr plot?
Of course.

Here's three engines.

Green: Dopples 170k VVT rebuilt by me running in an NA, MS3
Red: My Smurf post-turbo 1.6, MS2
Blue: 187k '01, again bone stock beyond a MSM axle back.

Attached Thumbnails Stock ecu AFRs, how bad were yours pre-tuning?-stock%2520vvt_zpsice9phfi.jpg  
curly is offline  
Old 02-25-2016, 11:07 AM
  #12  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

is that afr plot legit? that looks crazy (terrible)
18psi is offline  
Old 02-25-2016, 11:37 AM
  #13  
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
curly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 14,181
Total Cats: 1,131
Default

I have 2 more runs, although looks like we lost the WB signal on the blue line, but yeah, it's terrible.

Attached Thumbnails Stock ecu AFRs, how bad were yours pre-tuning?-stock%2520vvt_zpsae6ju8q6.jpg  
curly is offline  
Old 02-25-2016, 11:39 AM
  #14  
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
curly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 14,181
Total Cats: 1,131
Default

Just for comparison, this is the same car a few thousand miles later after I installed an Rev MS3. Made 10hp more and obviously had a much better fuel curve. Still a little rich but no WB yet, so I erred on the safe side for fueling.

Attached Thumbnails Stock ecu AFRs, how bad were yours pre-tuning?-stock%2520vs%2520ms_zpsqqrt22pw.png  
curly is offline  
Old 02-25-2016, 11:50 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
vteckiller2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dallas
Posts: 824
Total Cats: 64
Default

Originally Posted by 18psi
I'm curious what the oem ecu triggers around half throttle
anyone try this?
Mine goes into low 11's at anything over about 40% throttle. It goes into open loop admirably well for a miata ecu (BP5A ecu from japanland), but is equally terrible when it comes to the AFR.
vteckiller2000 is offline  
Old 02-25-2016, 11:55 AM
  #16  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by curly
Just for comparison, this is the same car a few thousand miles later after I installed an Rev MS3. Made 10hp more and obviously had a much better fuel curve. Still a little rich but no WB yet, so I erred on the safe side for fueling.
13afr is safe?
in that case I tune my cars way too safe

Originally Posted by vteckiller2000
Mine goes into low 11's at anything over about 40% throttle. It goes into open loop admirably well for a miata ecu (BP5A ecu from japanland), but is equally terrible when it comes to the AFR.
thanks for the feedback. it's impressive that these cars still get the mpg they do if that's how they react to part throttle
18psi is offline  
Old 02-25-2016, 12:09 PM
  #17  
Cpt. Slow
iTrader: (25)
 
curly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 14,181
Total Cats: 1,131
Default

It occasionally hits 13.0, but it's in the 12s most of the time...13.5 is where it's at for N/A.
curly is offline  
Old 02-25-2016, 12:22 PM
  #18  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
emilio700's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,325
Total Cats: 2,377
Default

Originally Posted by vteckiller2000
Just about to wrap up the megasquirt install and I got to thinking, how much worse is my open loop AFR compared to others? I saw Emilio in an older thread quote the worst he has seen is 12.5:1 on stock ecu. I see around 11.5 in the mid range tapering to about 10.2 at redline. Lots of breathing mods, but stock BP5A ecu.

How bad were your AFR's on a stock ecu?
Misquoted a bit. Leanest I have seen at WOT with a 100% stock NB is 12.5. On the rich side, the stock ECU can get down to low 11's. I have seen high 10's on bone stock NA's. Any stock ECU with a modified engine can quickly run way leaner than stoich at WOT though. Bottom line is, if it is modified, either verify you are safe with a WBO2 or stop being cheap and find some way to trim fuel via a standalone, AFPR, piggy back or whatever your budget will allow.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR
emilio700 is offline  
Old 02-25-2016, 12:26 PM
  #19  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by curly
It occasionally hits 13.0, but it's in the 12s most of the time...13.5 is where it's at for N/A.
hmm, I usually trigger 12.5
18psi is offline  
Old 02-25-2016, 01:18 PM
  #20  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Arca_ex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 1,628
Total Cats: 427
Default

When my 1994 was bone stock the AFR would stay 14.5 until 3k, then would drop to 13 fast, by 5500 it was dipped down to 10.5 then at Redline it had worked its way back up to 12.0. Looked like a big "V" shape. Pretty terrible.
Arca_ex is offline  


Quick Reply: Stock ecu AFRs, how bad were yours pre-tuning?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13 AM.