Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

compression ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2012, 02:43 AM
  #1  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
dandan92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Central Coast, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5
Total Cats: 0
Default compression ratios

So i have a '92 model with a 1.6 that is getting closer and closer to death, ive got a '99 bp motor that is going to replace it. My plan is to build the bp to help support a turbo conversion. I am currently on my p plates in australia so im restricted to no forced induction for another 12 months. my power goals are around the 300hp mark, maybe more, maybe less, ill see what i can get.

From what i can figure, i have several options:

1. Swap the bp in now as is to replace the dying motor and build/turbo in 12 months.

2. Build the motor now to turbo spec i.e.: lower compression forged pistons and rods etc. i do understand that you can run a turbo setup without building the engine, but for safety and a bit of piece of mind im choosing to.

3. Hope the 1.6 lasts for another 12 months while building the 1.8 and put it in with the turbo once i get my full license.

Im leaning towards option 2 because it means i can diagnose problems with the engine swap separately to the conversion to FI and i wont have to rip the motor out again for the foreseeable future. My question is this, will i be able to run the motor without a turbo with the lower compression ratio, probably 9.0:1, by compensating for the lack of compression via ECU tuning?

sorry if this has already been answered or the answer is blatantly obvious.
dandan92 is offline  
Old 10-04-2012, 02:53 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
iTrader: (21)
 
bmxfuel007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 518
Total Cats: 19
Default

prepare for butt rape?

Last edited by bmxfuel007; 10-04-2012 at 04:37 AM.
bmxfuel007 is offline  
Old 10-04-2012, 04:35 AM
  #3  
Newb
 
taocle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 32
Total Cats: 0
Default

yes you can run 9.0:1 but on a n/a lower compression = less power.
i would honestly post this on mx5cartalk instead of here. people dont like noobs here aha.
so how is your 1.6 about to die if you dont mind sharing?? these motors are tough as f#ck maybe its an easy fix
taocle is offline  
Old 10-04-2012, 11:33 AM
  #4  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
MartinezA92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Redwood City, CA
Posts: 1,784
Total Cats: 42
Default

I ran 9:1 naturally aspirated for 2 years before I got my **** together and boosted it. And I'm pretty sure the 94's have 8.8:1 (i think).

You'll be fine.
MartinezA92 is offline  
Old 10-04-2012, 11:55 AM
  #5  
Elite Member
iTrader: (3)
 
skidude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Outside Portland Maine
Posts: 2,023
Total Cats: 19
Default

Build the motor now, drop it in, tune NA, then boost it so hard its mother screams.

Last edited by skidude; 10-04-2012 at 02:17 PM.
skidude is offline  
Old 10-04-2012, 12:12 PM
  #6  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

Originally Posted by skidude
Build the motor now, drop it in, tune NA, then boost it so hard it's mother screams.
+1, don't be a ------ about it.
hustler is offline  
Old 10-04-2012, 10:55 PM
  #7  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
dandan92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Central Coast, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5
Total Cats: 0
Default

thanks guys that answers my question. anyway, previous owner was useless and managed to flatten one side of the keyway on the crank :/ its loc-tited back together now but every now and then it still feels like its slipped out of timing a bit and then comes good again. it just doesn't feel right anymore.
dandan92 is offline  
Old 10-04-2012, 11:56 PM
  #8  
Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
soviet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 3,493
Total Cats: 268
Default

build the motor now to turbo spec.

when my turbo broke my car basically became a N/A intercooled 1.9. even with all the intake restriction (85kpa under WOT, lol) etc etc it was a bit faster than a stock 99 with super-healthy engine.
soviet is offline  
Old 10-05-2012, 12:00 AM
  #9  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Faeflora's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 8,682
Total Cats: 130
Default

Originally Posted by soviet
build the motor now to turbo spec.

when my turbo broke my car basically became a N/A intercooled 1.9. even with all the intake restriction (85kpa under WOT, lol) etc etc it was a bit faster than a stock 99 with super-healthy engine.
Megasquirt FTW!
Faeflora is offline  
Old 10-05-2012, 04:04 AM
  #10  
Newb
Thread Starter
 
dandan92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Central Coast, NSW, Australia
Posts: 5
Total Cats: 0
Default

cheers guys, thanks for the info, megasquirt is the plan too
dandan92 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Full_Tilt_Boogie
Build Threads
84
04-12-2021 04:21 PM
Quinn
Cars for sale/trade
6
10-23-2016 07:58 AM
graexodus
Miata parts for sale/trade
9
10-25-2015 03:34 PM
zephyrusaurai
Meet and Greet
2
09-28-2015 10:59 PM
Motorsport-Electronics
ECUs and Tuning
0
09-05-2015 08:02 AM



Quick Reply: compression ratios



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 AM.