Modding the Air Intake for MAF delete / IAT install
1 Attachment(s)
Getting ready to install my DIYPNP and I'm curious what the preferred method is these days for modifying the stock intake to accommodate an IAT sensor. I came across this post and that seemed like a good way to handle it.
Does anyone make a straight pipe with an IAT bung to bypass the MAF and go to the stock airbox? Assuming that would work. Or is the cone style a better option? Attachment 233331 |
add a turbo.
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1233384)
add a turbo.
|
I'd want the AIT within the airflow, not just near it.
|
silicone intakes?
http://www.siliconeintakes.com/holse...er/-p-500.html though you'd need 3/8NPT for a GM IAT |
I'd want that same thing but as an aluminium pipe. Clamp the stock crossover to one side, and the cone filter to the other.
|
are you talking long term or short term?
*edit: I type slow. just put it into the airbox. Works fine short term |
1 Attachment(s)
|
yeah that.
|
I literally stuck mine into the snorkel and let it sit on the filter, that's about as much "in the airflow" as you need
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1233419)
just put it into the airbox. Works fine short term |
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1233417)
I'd want that same thing but as an aluminium pipe. Clamp the stock crossover to one side, and the cone filter to the other.
I really like this solution
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1233425)
I like this solution too. Dont use a cone filter and just tape/screw it--prefilter-- inside the airbox.
|
if nb then 2.75
don't remember na size the other up-side to my solution is that the whole sensor is inside the airbox, and in the path of airflow, thus significantly helping reduce or prevent ait heat soak |
If you know someone with a 3D printer I can send you this file. I have one with the proper IACV port location for the 1.6 and the 1.8
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1427427981 https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...ine=1427427981 |
that's properly the worst possible spot for an AIT.
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1233459)
that the worse possible spot for an AIT.
|
Originally Posted by Braineack
(Post 1233459)
that the worse possible spot for an AIT.
Placing an IAT sensor directly behind the radiator exposes it to a hell of a lot of hot air, and even though the fancy GM-style "open element" IAT sensors aren't supposed to heat-soak externally, they always seem to. The result is artificially elevated IAT readings. I had reasonably good success drilling and tapping the cold-side end tank of my intercooler, and placing the sensor there. It would obviously heak-soak just a tad after you parked the car hot, but once you re-started it and got moving, the sensor seemed to cool off and give believable readings while in off-boost cruise. |
|
I'll revist my IAT location and try to figure out a better solution.
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 1233465)
Changing topic slightly, I find this extremely interesting, and am curious as to both the material from which that part is made as well as its long-term durability.
I design aftermarket intake for a living and we run 3D printed prototypes for 2-3 months on vehicle while the production tooling is being made. I have not seen any failure or degradation in the 3D printed ABS parts. We usually use 0.15" wall thickness. However, these are street vehicles that don't see the extreme abuse of track cars. I've run that intake at 1 track event so far without any issues. I'll be keeping a close eye on it and always take the spare stock tube with me. |
ShmoozerJoe has one of those things (one of those cobra looking intake tubes), and (correc me if I'm wrong, Joe) it's ABS plastic.
And his cracked last wednesday. Right down the middle |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands