I recently bought that intake, so technically it's a spare. I am going to gut my upper plenum and see what happens. If it robs me on the butt dyno, I can simply swap it with my stock one.
|
How much different would my fuel VE table be if I swapped out my upper plenums? If it's gutted, would it need more fuel when VICS is open? I ask this, because once my upper plenum is gutted, I would like to do a dyno pull with my stock plenum, and then swap it with my gutted one.
|
Originally Posted by pdexta
(Post 849833)
The bottom half of the intake manifold was untouched with VICS active. I can only assume that the ported top disrupted flow enough to lose power. I'm putting it back to stock until the whole manifold is ported and I'll try again.
I'm doing some more comparisons today since I'm undoing it anyway, and it's difficult for me to believe it would be THIS bad. I'm doing a log at 19psi, and one with the wastegate disconnected (since my friend is running this setup on his NA car). I'll let you guys know how the numbers come out. Easy way to tell if you're losing airflow is to look at the log of your AFR. If it goes richer by x%, you're flowing that much air. It's not quite that simple, but it is a measurable indicator. Make sure that you log on the same strip of road in the same direction. I used this method when tuning VVT, although VVT is different because it affects the amount of time for combustion.
Originally Posted by thirdgen
(Post 850125)
How much different would my fuel VE table be if I swapped out my upper plenums? If it's gutted, would it need more fuel when VICS is open? I ask this, because once my upper plenum is gutted, I would like to do a dyno pull with my stock plenum, and then swap it with my gutted one.
If you are flowing more or less air, you will indeed need to retune. Should just be a couple of % scaling up or down and take like 5 minute. Also, guys, check your boost levels too. Small changes 1-2 psi because of less or more restricted airflow or better/worse spool will obviously affect the results a lot. Not enough people spend time trying to tune and optimize boost and spool. That's where all our power is too :| |
The law of speed density:
If it does anything, it will require tuning. |
If it drops pressure and leans out, its flowing more.
If it doesn neither of those things and requires no addition in fuel, its failaids. I'm really surprised more people aren't going the OBX/Honda mani route. Its 2-300 bux all said and done, and is in every way more awesome than gutting the stocker.....Just sayin |
18psi novody cares about power here so no interedt.
I mean we only have one vvt cam on the market. Sort of. Suck. |
lol, so you don't care about power either?
cause you're still rocking one with the lamest excuse I've ever heard. |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 850276)
lol, so you don't care about power either?
cause you're still rocking one with the lamest excuse I've ever heard. |
You realize how retarded that is right? With a ginormous turbo it will of course compensate for the restriction by cramming insane pressure through the mani and you most likely won't even see a dropoff at all. Because that turbo is probably bigger than your engine.
Anyways, back on topic. |
Wut???
Me no understand. R u saying that big turbo no need intakemani????? |
I'm saying just because you're not seeing the power plummet up top doesn't mean you wouldn't gain a good chunk of power from switching to the hawnduhh mani. just like the 2.5" vs 3" exhaust argument. Both make power, one just makes more of it.
I really hope thirdgen gets some really good and consistent logs when he hogs out his though. So far the 4 examples I've seen 1 gained 10hp and 3 either didn't gain anything or lost a few. |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 850305)
I'm saying just because you're not seeing the power plummet up top doesn't mean you wouldn't gain a good chunk of power from switching to the hawnduhh mani. just like the 2.5" vs 3" exhaust argument. Both make power, one just makes more of it.
Hmm interesting. I mean honestly, I know that I would be best with a nice 4L dual plenum with medium runners. ARTech may be helping me out with that. Gotta get car on road first |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 850305)
So far the 4 examples I've seen 1 gained 10hp and 3 either didn't gain anything or lost a few.
Virtual dyno may be correct, but I just like to see actual physical properties to give a genuine answer. Another difference between everybody elses results will be my turbo selection, my IC plumbing sizing, my atmospheric conditions, my IAT temp, etc. |
Sav posted up real dyno comparisons of honda mani
So did levnubnin So did leatherface iirc |
|
Played with the plasma cutter and die grinder today...
4 Attachment(s)
Attachment 38730
Attachment 38731 Today I cut the upper plenum out with a plasma cutter, then took a die grinder with a carbie bit and smoothed it all out. The only thing I removed on the lower plenum was the little port between 2&3. I did this just for piece of mind to better evenly distribute airflow to the VICS. This all took me like 2 hours of my Saturday, and I hope it'll make a difference when I eventually put it on the car. I'm just glad I finally actually did some work on performance miata related stuff. |
Originally Posted by pdexta
(Post 849762)
Blue is stock, Red is with the ported top. Both done at 15psi.
https://www.miataturbo.net/attachmen...1&d=1332042554 |
Originally Posted by triple88a
(Post 977393)
This is not valid. Until 5.25k the lines would be the same.
|
Honestly my experience with Virtual dyno has been horrible. I've yet to get 2 similar plots even when ran back to back.
|
Originally Posted by triple88a
(Post 977393)
This is not valid. Until 5.25k the lines would be the same.
I can't remember where I posted the completed results (with top and bottom ported) but my results showed a decent gain up top but still lost a little down low. FWIW. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands