N/A is best (weight loss)
4 Attachment(s)
|
So you saved 11 pounds and gave up only a few hundred hp? Sweet.
edit- please don't ban me |
No, I'm building a very lightweight tube chassis car. Target 1500lbs wet with cage. It was always going to be n/a. 11 lbs savings up front is huge.
I don't want the 40+ lbs that a turbo would add. May do a K24 swap later... |
Originally Posted by Ben
(Post 1279416)
No, I'm building a very lightweight tube chassis car. Target 1500lbs wet with cage. It was always going to be n/a. 11 lbs savings up front is huge.
I don't want the 40+ lbs that a turbo would add. May do a K24 swap later... |
So why not a rotary swap? It would be a bunch lighter. The only downsides are crappy fuel efficiency and other practical concerns.
|
Originally Posted by AlwaysBroken
(Post 1279437)
So why not a rotary swap? It would be a bunch lighter. The only downsides are crappy fuel efficiency and other practical concerns.
Originally Posted by AlwaysBroken
So why not a rotary swap?
Originally Posted by AlwaysBroken
|
:likecat:
|
Originally Posted by Dunning Kruger Affect
(Post 1279477)
.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:57 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands