Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

New Miata Junk 2 Intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-2017, 04:19 PM
  #281  
Junior Member
 
Zsanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Derpsville
Posts: 163
Total Cats: -11
Default

Is it safe to presume that the as pictured manifold was the one recorded and it did not have the Plenum Spacer?
Are gains negligible with FI?
Zsanz is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -5 Leave a negcat
Old 12-17-2017, 04:21 PM
  #282  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,951
Total Cats: 1,004
Default

Did you read the thread? Derpsville indeed.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 12-17-2017, 04:34 PM
  #283  
Junior Member
 
Zsanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Derpsville
Posts: 163
Total Cats: -11
Default

Originally Posted by turbofan
Did you read the thread? Derpsville indeed.
no, JUST HERE 4 DA PIX
Zsanz is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -5 Leave a negcat
Old 12-17-2017, 04:50 PM
  #284  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

say something stupid again
18psi is offline  
Old 12-17-2017, 05:41 PM
  #285  
Junior Member
 
Zsanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Derpsville
Posts: 163
Total Cats: -11
Default

It was more sarcasm, I was being genuine though towards not seeing mention of gains with use of the plenum spacer on FI applications. Guess I’ll just have to get one of my guys to CFD flow characteristics
Zsanz is offline  
Reply
Leave a poscat -1 Leave a negcat
Old 12-17-2017, 05:46 PM
  #286  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (1)
 
turbofan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Forest, CA
Posts: 7,951
Total Cats: 1,004
Default

RTFT.
__________________
Ed@949Racing/Supermiata
www.949racing.com
www.supermiata.com
turbofan is offline  
Old 12-17-2017, 05:54 PM
  #287  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by Zsanz
It was more sarcasm, I was being genuine though towards not seeing mention of gains with use of the plenum spacer on FI applications. Guess I’ll just have to get one of my guys to CFD flow characteristics
Everyone and their mother is "planning" to do all sorts of testing and post all sorts of results.

So far, less than a handful of people posted anything even close to data, and of those only two showed some semi-decent a/b comparo's.

So you're more than welcome to contribute.
18psi is offline  
Old 12-17-2017, 07:37 PM
  #288  
Supporting Vendor
iTrader: (3)
 
emilio700's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,325
Total Cats: 2,376
Default

Originally Posted by Zsanz
It was more sarcasm, I was being genuine though towards not seeing mention of gains with use of the plenum spacer on FI applications. Guess I’ll just have to get one of my guys to CFD flow characteristics
CFD doesn't tell you squat about power potential in a manifold unless your engineer can model the harmonics and complex interactions between each cylinder pressure waves and how they take turns pulsing through the throttle body.

Just like a a shiny hogged out intake port might show wacky CFM gains but make less power everywhere than a lumpy, tiny, OEM port full of sharp edges.

That the S2 appears to only make a tiny bit more power in a very narrow band is testament to this. Looks like it should make more power everywhere. Doesn't.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR
emilio700 is online now  
Old 12-17-2017, 07:37 PM
  #289  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
viperormiata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Key West
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
Default

I'm just upset the developer of the product didn't perform the testing.
viperormiata is offline  
Old 12-17-2017, 08:11 PM
  #290  
All-round "Good Guy"
 
Lokiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 993
Total Cats: 245
Default

Originally Posted by viperormiata
I'm just upset the developer of the product didn't perform the testing.
Maybe they did!
Lokiel is offline  
Old 12-17-2017, 08:19 PM
  #291  
Junior Member
 
Zsanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Derpsville
Posts: 163
Total Cats: -11
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
CFD doesn't tell you squat about power potential in a manifold unless your engineer can model the harmonics and complex interactions between each cylinder pressure waves and how they take turns pulsing through the throttle body.

Just like a a shiny hogged out intake port might show wacky CFM gains but make less power everywhere than a lumpy, tiny, OEM port full of sharp edges.

That the S2 appears to only make a tiny bit more power in a very narrow band is testament to this. Looks like it should make more power everywhere. Doesn't.

Appreciate the reply,
Was curious if S2 released the spacer "because they can" aligned with the aformetnioend results for if its truly a band-aid that fixes some aspect of the volumetric distribution/efficiency.
Maybe ansys will know, maybe Ill have to wait to dyno back to back for closure.
Zsanz is offline  
Old 12-17-2017, 10:05 PM
  #292  
Former Vendor
iTrader: (31)
 
Savington's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 15,442
Total Cats: 2,099
Default

Originally Posted by Schroedinger
So I wouldn't be misinterpreting that graph if I observed that the VTCS is the better manifold everywhere except >6000rpm?
I am highly incredulous of any chart which shows a stock 01-05 manifold holding a flat torque peak to 6,000rpm. Use FM's comparison to judge between the two, but forget about the scales. Neither is accurate to what you would see at sea level.
Savington is offline  
Old 12-17-2017, 11:33 PM
  #293  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

Originally Posted by viperormiata
I'm just upset the developer of the product didn't perform the testing.
this implies that the product was actually developed.

vs you know.....chopping off a honda flange, welding on a miata flange, making mold, and casting.

Originally Posted by Lokiel
Maybe they did!
I bet. And when it didn't perform, they left out the data .


But despite all this, It's still a cool new product, esp for the money.
Which shows just how low our IM standards are
18psi is offline  
Old 12-17-2017, 11:44 PM
  #294  
Senior Member
 
AlwaysBroken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: TAMPA, FL
Posts: 817
Total Cats: 20
Default

Taken alone, this seems like a pretty cool alternative to hunting down a flattop... but you have to also buy the skunk throttle as well. So it's really more like an 800 dollar flattop than a direct alternative. *googles current price of flattop manifold* Oh well nevermind, this actually appears to be a great deal.

I'm still kinda of amazed at how no one has come up with a manifold that makes better power than a mazda factory manifold. Did the old mazda engineers really have better tools for modeling intake manifolds than we have today? Or does the miata's head just suck so bad that it's impossible to fix by improving the intake?
AlwaysBroken is offline  
Old 12-18-2017, 12:05 AM
  #295  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

the latter
18psi is offline  
Old 12-18-2017, 08:35 AM
  #296  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
swimming108's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Seven Valleys, PA
Posts: 638
Total Cats: 11
Default

Originally Posted by AlwaysBroken
Taken alone, this seems like a pretty cool alternative to hunting down a flattop... but you have to also buy the skunk throttle as well. So it's really more like an 800 dollar flattop than a direct alternative. *googles current price of flattop manifold* Oh well nevermind, this actually appears to be a great deal.

I'm still kinda of amazed at how no one has come up with a manifold that makes better power than a mazda factory manifold. Did the old mazda engineers really have better tools for modeling intake manifolds than we have today? Or does the miata's head just suck so bad that it's impossible to fix by improving the intake?
Kinda makes you wish that someone would develop an aftermarket head for the BP block, doesn't it... That will never happen though. Even the CNC machined heads that 949 offered were too expensive for majority of the cheapskate miata owners.

I may not get rid of my VICS manifold, since my primary use of the car is autox, but i am glad that S2 decided to expand our options with this manifold. They didn't have to release this manifold for us and it probably isn't even that profitable of a market expansion for them. A big "Thank you" to 949 and FM for giving us some legitimate data to understand how it will perform on our motors.
swimming108 is offline  
Old 12-18-2017, 12:14 PM
  #297  
Senior Member
 
Mazdaspeeder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 916
Total Cats: 70
Default

I'm glad well get to see S2 vs SQ numbers on the same dyno. I was amazed at just how much less power the FM car made overall compared to what I do here at sea level. That car had a 3071 (or 76) with 27psi and made WITH the S2 manifold what i make on 20psi out of a 6258 here.

I guess its safe to say there will be more gains to be had at sea level?
Mazdaspeeder is offline  
Old 12-18-2017, 12:37 PM
  #298  
Junior Member
 
The Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lakewood (Green Mountain) CO.
Posts: 250
Total Cats: -63
Default

^ In Colorado (and parts of New Mexico) power wise, is like loosing a cylinder ot two. Is the price we pay to live in this wonderful place.
The Driver is offline  
Old 12-18-2017, 01:26 PM
  #299  
Junior Member
 
04orangecrush's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 74
Total Cats: 4
Default

^^^ It’s awesome. I lost 95hp in my cobra moving to New Mexico from Florida(500hp vs 405 hp) It’s terrible, my car felt soooo slow. I at least upgraded the blower now. 20lb pulley only makes about 15lb up here. Car feels 10000x faster on 17lb pulley at sea level than it does on the 20lb pulley where I live. Anyways, back to topic at hand.
04orangecrush is offline  
Old 12-18-2017, 02:13 PM
  #300  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
hornetball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 696
Default

An F/A-18 at 50,000' is an absolute dog!
hornetball is offline  



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:19 PM.