Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. (https://www.miataturbo.net/)
-   Engine Performance (https://www.miataturbo.net/engine-performance-56/)
-   -   OEM Head/Main bolts vs ARP Studs (https://www.miataturbo.net/engine-performance-56/oem-head-main-bolts-vs-arp-studs-92496/)

Gn0m4 03-14-2017 04:52 AM

OEM Head/Main bolts vs ARP Studs
 
Morning,

Iīm working on my 250/300bhp engine and i would like to know safety power for OEM bolts.
I donīt know if ARP would be a must to use under 300. I didnīt read anything about crushed OEM bolts.

Same for healthy OEM oil pump vs Boundary one.
I still have a 5v gearbox so i would be under 250 for a time and will jump to 300 next year. Maybe could keep OEM pump and change it next year, with 6v gearbox...

Thanks !

ryansmoneypit 03-14-2017 10:50 AM

They are cheap insurance. Same with the pump. Imo.

18psi 03-14-2017 11:21 AM

You should be ok on stock ones for now, but most would replace anyway just so you don't have to tear it apart later to do that.

Savington 03-14-2017 12:15 PM

OEM main bolt + 300whp = https://www.miataturbo.net/engine-pe...n-motor-57653/

18psi 03-14-2017 12:38 PM

250-300bhp is what, 220-270whp?
Either way, seems like a waste to build an engine without em only to go back in later and tear it apart to replace.
Subtract cost of labor/gaskets/fluids/etc. and it's just silly not to do it.

codrus 03-14-2017 04:32 PM

There are those who claim that you can't install ARP main studs without line boring the block. I dunno, I've done it twice and didn't line bore and had no problems, but maybe I just got lucky.

--Ian

Gn0m4 03-14-2017 04:36 PM

Thanks for all answer and advices.
I think iīll go with ARP Head and Main studs but keep with OEM oil pump. I canīt pay for all items and OEM will be "ok" before 5v gearbox crush... so i will change gearbox, clutch and oil pump at time (I hope this happens later 250bhp).

codrus 03-14-2017 04:43 PM

You know that changing the oil pump requires pulling the oil pan off, right? And that pulling the oil pan is best done by pulling the motor out of the car? It's basically the first thing that goes on the engine after you've installed the rods, pistons & crankshaft. It's easier to install head studs later than it is the oil pump.

No way would I put a motor back together without replacing the oil pump unless it's got very, very few miles on it. And if I'm buying a pump anyway, I'd buy a boundary one, not an OEM one.

--Ian

albumleaf 03-14-2017 04:50 PM

Technically you can do it under the car by taking the subframe off.. but it's a fucking terrible idea.

Gn0m4 03-14-2017 04:53 PM

Yes i know that but pulling gearbox and change clutch / flywheel with out pull out the engine would be madness so i think would be easier to pull the engine out and to change oil pump without remove engine head, just the oil pan.
My actual OEM oil pump is healthy (check it with gauges) and i can rise up the pressure little more just putting a washer in the damper... in other way BF is so expensive.

Is there any problem with oil pan (1.6 1991) clearance and ARP studs?

bahurd 03-14-2017 05:02 PM


Originally Posted by Gn0m4 (Post 1398668)
Yes i know that but pulling gearbox and change clutch / flywheel with out pull out the engine would be madness so i think would be easier to pull the engine out and to change oil pump without remove engine head, just the oil pan.
My actual OEM oil pump is healthy (check it with gauges) and i can rise up the pressure little more just putting a washer in the damper... in other way BF is so expensive.

Is there any problem with oil pan (1.6 1991) clearance and ARP studs?

I think everyone made an assumption when you said 250/300 HP it was a 1.8L... Now, you say 1.6L?

nbfather 03-14-2017 06:02 PM

Has anybody ever broken a main cap when running studs?
I just got my first look at a set op BP main caps...Not very inspiring!

codrus 03-14-2017 07:06 PM


Originally Posted by Gn0m4 (Post 1398668)
Yes i know that but pulling gearbox and change clutch / flywheel with out pull out the engine would be madness so i think would be easier to pull the engine out and to change oil pump without remove engine head, just the oil pan.
My actual OEM oil pump is healthy (check it with gauges) and i can rise up the pressure little more just putting a washer in the damper... in other way BF is so expensive.

Huh? If you're just doing the clutch & flywheel then it's a lot easier to just pull the tranny out and do it there. There's less than half as much stuff required to get the tranny out by itself as to get the whole motor out.

...you're not building a 1.6, are you?

--Ian

Gn0m4 03-15-2017 05:37 AM

I'm building my 1.6 without forged pistons (i think not necessary under 300 bhp).
Iīll mount OEM pistons, new rings, forged rods, ACL race bearings in all parts, ARP rod bolts and full head / block work.

You can check photos here: https://www.instagram.com/gn0m4/

Just thinking about ARP Head studs vs ARP Main studs vs BF Oil pump... the money the problem. Just want to create best engine "upgrade stages" for the money and for the other parts of the car.
My OEM Oil pump healthy is perfect and BF is sooo expensive, so in my opinion to mount ARP studs in all engine would be best option.
I never changed gearbox without pulled engine... so i donīt know how harder is.

Next year could change clutch, flywheel, gearbox, oilpump... all at same time.

Gn0m4 03-16-2017 04:37 AM

What about re-use main bolts? would be possible with safety? and... re-use head bolts?
I see a lot of people with 250whp with stock internals and pumps.

Thatīs my goal so has any sense to build a forged 1.6 engine with oem pistons, oem head bolts / main bolts and oem oil pump?
has more sense to build it with oem pistons, ARP head bolts / main bolts and oem oil pump with ATI damper?
or to build it with oem pistons, ARP head bolts / main bolts and BF oil pump?

Just thinking about throwing cash to finish my 1.6 project with oem pistons (to rise 300 bhp) vs to forget it and keep with my actual items (forged rods, ACL race bearings in all parts, ARP rod bolts and full head / block work).

nbfather 03-16-2017 08:19 AM

First off, on a project that you are going to spend a lot of good money....I would toss that 1.6 in the dumpster (OK sell it to some sap) and get a 1.8.
Once you start a project it is hard to stop...and then you have a bunch o money in a crap engine.
Maybe that is just me.

So you are going to rebuild an engine? You want to put a 30 year old oil pump back in service? Those pumps came with fragile cast gears (utter shite for high performance) from the factory?
Now it is 30 or however many years old.
You are under the impression this pump is somehow OK? If the pump was a proven design...the best there was....and it had 30 years on it? In the Fking dumpster!
The oil pump is the heart of the motor...it has a jammer and all you have spent is gone. It wont warn you either!
Good pistons and rods...What are they $750.00 now? No you don't "have" to used forged goodies, but you have to pay for the other factory hardparts..I bet they are more money!
You weren't going to rebuild with 30 year old pistons right?
Dude the gaskets are near $250.00!

Building these things is expensive. Do it once, do it right, and with any luck you wont have the grief of a blown motor.
You can turn up the boost when you get your 6 speed without fear of popping a rod. From there octane and tires (you are going to burn them off) will be your only concern
Everybody has to stack up parts and wait until they have enough money.
Save a few extra months, sell the running 1.6 to offset costs.

What I would do...What my son Is doing right now.

How do you have a 1.6 in a 99 miata?
Did you get another car since you made your profile 2 days ago? :)

Savington 03-16-2017 12:21 PM

So worried about your budget that you're willing to ignore all the advice you asked for. Nothing breaks the budget like building your motor twice because you were willing to delude yourself into thinking you didn't have to do it right the first time.

Gotta love it.

Gn0m4 03-16-2017 02:05 PM

Thanks for your advices dudes.

patsmx5 03-16-2017 02:19 PM


Originally Posted by Gn0m4 (Post 1398743)
I'm building my 1.6 without forged pistons (i think not necessary under 300 bhp).
Iīll mount OEM pistons, new rings, forged rods, ACL race bearings in all parts, ARP rod bolts and full head / block work.

You can check photos here: https://www.instagram.com/gn0m4/

Just thinking about ARP Head studs vs ARP Main studs vs BF Oil pump... the money the problem. Just want to create best engine "upgrade stages" for the money and for the other parts of the car.
My OEM Oil pump healthy is perfect and BF is sooo expensive, so in my opinion to mount ARP studs in all engine would be best option.
I never changed gearbox without pulled engine... so i donīt know how harder is.

Next year could change clutch, flywheel, gearbox, oilpump... all at same time.

If I were building a budget motor, and I could only afford to change a few things, I would do a stock motor + forged rods, hone + new rings, new quality gaskets, plastigauge the bearings. If any extra money, new bearings. If any more money, ATI Harmonic damper. After that, forged pistons and ARP head studs would be my upgrades going in the motor. My current motor is all of this and nothing more. I run a stock oil pump and have never had a failure, but apparently I'm the luckiest guy in the world because the forums say the stock pumps are fragile. Mine have seen a lot of RPM and power and been fine, but I do run an ATI damper and I think that is probably the reason my stock pump lives. People boost stock 20 year old stock 100K+ mile engines to 230-250whp all the time, you don't need to spend thousands of dollars to make 250-300bhp. But if you have money to burn, sure it's nice to have everything built to hold 600+.

EDIT: oh yeah, I have the ARP mains studs too. Not sure those are needed, but I did them.

patsmx5 03-16-2017 02:22 PM


Originally Posted by nbfather (Post 1398683)
Has anybody ever broken a main cap when running studs?
I just got my first look at a set op BP main caps...Not very inspiring!

If I ever break my current motor, the next one will have steel caps, probably build a custom girdle for them as well.

nbfather 03-16-2017 06:59 PM


Originally Posted by patsmx5 (Post 1399144)
If I ever break my current motor, the next one will have steel caps, probably build a custom girdle for them as well.

We bought a wrecked '99 and stripped it for the engine and spare parts....Nice to have backup parts...especially that engine!
Once the engine was on a stand I started having a look at the thing....The idea of sticking near 4 times the original power through those cast caps.....I got zero sense of security!
I am shocked that I have not heard of failures? A 6L 1300hp LS is the same force per cc as a 400hp Bp...when you compare the caps...One of these is so not like the other! :)
Not to mention the V8 has more caps to spread the load.

I am torn between the cost of the steel caps plus an align hone, and putting that money into the build of the second engine...I am leaning toward the latter.
On a high rpm high dollar NA build I would not hesitate...Not for one second.

Interesting to hear you question the caps!

Jamie

patsmx5 03-16-2017 07:03 PM

I almost put steel caps in this motor. Didn't like the cost (add 1000 easy after parts + machine work) and I wanted a girdle as well if I was paying that much. I don't remember exact numbers, but off the top of my head, steel is twice the stiffness of cast iron, so not only would they be stronger, they would be stiffer as well which would be good for bottom end life at high loading.

codrus 03-16-2017 08:41 PM


Originally Posted by nbfather (Post 1399196)
A 6L 1300hp LS is the same force per cc as a 400hp Bp...when you compare the caps...One of these is so not like the other! :)
Not to mention the V8 has more caps to spread the load.

V8s have a lot more side load on the caps than inline engines do.

--Ian

nbfather 03-17-2017 04:12 AM


Originally Posted by codrus (Post 1399209)
V8s have a lot more side load on the caps than inline engines do.

--Ian

True!
A lot more weight whirling around too

Gn0m4 03-17-2017 04:45 AM


Originally Posted by patsmx5 (Post 1399143)
If I were building a budget motor, and I could only afford to change a few things, I would do a stock motor + forged rods, hone + new rings, new quality gaskets, plastigauge the bearings. If any extra money, new bearings. If any more money, ATI Harmonic damper. After that, forged pistons and ARP head studs would be my upgrades going in the motor. My current motor is all of this and nothing more. I run a stock oil pump and have never had a failure, but apparently I'm the luckiest guy in the world because the forums say the stock pumps are fragile. Mine have seen a lot of RPM and power and been fine, but I do run an ATI damper and I think that is probably the reason my stock pump lives. People boost stock 20 year old stock 100K+ mile engines to 230-250whp all the time, you don't need to spend thousands of dollars to make 250-300bhp. But if you have money to burn, sure it's nice to have everything built to hold 600+.

EDIT: oh yeah, I have the ARP mains studs too. Not sure those are needed, but I did them.


Thanks !

Definitely iīll go with ARP stus (head, main and rods), ACL bearings (main, rods and thrust), EAGLE rods, OEM STD pistons with SEALED POWER rings and bottom end rebuild (honed and skimmed), top end rebuild (ported, polished and skimmed), SUPERTECH valve seals and COMETIC head gasket.

I would like to build a fully forged engine but my bottom / top end are finished so i donīt want to sell it and loose money and donīt want to pay again for bored and honed to build a fully forged 1.6 engine (that will cost to me plus 600$). I donīt want to go up 300 bhp, for that reason donīt want to waste so much money and to buy a perfect forged engine machine. Thoseīre the reasons why i didnīt swap to 1.8

Iīm going to create 3 stages: 200bhp at the beginning, 250bhp in 2018 (ATI damper), 300bhp in 2019 (6v gearbox, WALBRO fuel pump, TOYOTA coil pack).

Iīm not track/heavy user (probably just 2/3 tracks/year) so i think iīll be fine.

DaWaN 03-17-2017 05:06 AM


Originally Posted by patsmx5 (Post 1399143)
If I were building a budget motor, and I could only afford to change a few things, I would do a stock motor + forged rods, hone + new rings, new quality gaskets, plastigauge the bearings. If any extra money, new bearings. If any more money, ATI Harmonic damper. After that, forged pistons and ARP head studs would be my upgrades going in the motor. My current motor is all of this and nothing more. I run a stock oil pump and have never had a failure, but apparently I'm the luckiest guy in the world because the forums say the stock pumps are fragile. Mine have seen a lot of RPM and power and been fine, but I do run an ATI damper and I think that is probably the reason my stock pump lives. People boost stock 20 year old stock 100K+ mile engines to 230-250whp all the time, you don't need to spend thousands of dollars to make 250-300bhp. But if you have money to burn, sure it's nice to have everything built to hold 600+.
EDIT: oh yeah, I have the ARP mains studs too. Not sure those are needed, but I did them.

What oil pump did you run? From what I understand, the oil pump failures some have seen is due to lack of flow in the relief valve channel. This combined with the somewhat loose fitting of the pump drive probably causes the oil pump failures. I think the VVT pump has an improved design and will probably not fail. Porting the relief valve channel or fitting an external relief valve probably solves it too. If the boundary pump has a better tolerance on the fitting with the crank that also helps.

Originally Posted by Gn0m4 (Post 1399264)
Definitely iīll go with ARP stus (head, main and rods), ACL bearings (main, rods and thrust), EAGLE rods, OEM STD pistons with SEALED POWER rings and bottom end rebuild (honed and skimmed), top end rebuild (ported, polished and skimmed), SUPERTECH valve seals and COMETIC head gasket.
Iīm going to do 3 stages: 200bhp at the beginning, 250bhp in 2018 (ATI damper), 300bhp in 2019 (6v gearbox, WALBRO fuel pump, TOYOTA coil pack).

You might want to throw in forged pistons too, makes the motor stand up better in case you have some detonation.
Also I have read some bad experience with Supertech valve stem seals, so I would suggest to stick to OEM valve seals.

Gn0m4 03-17-2017 05:32 AM


Originally Posted by DaWaN (Post 1399265)
What oil pump did you run? From what I understand, the oil pump failures some have seen is due to lack of flow in the relief valve channel. This combined with the somewhat loose fitting of the pump drive probably causes the oil pump failures. I think the VVT pump has an improved design and will probably not fail. Porting the relief valve channel or fitting an external relief valve probably solves it too. If the boundary pump has a better tolerance on the fitting with the crank that also helps.

You might want to throw in forged pistons too, makes the motor stand up better in case you have some detonation.
Also I have read some bad experience with Supertech valve stem seals, so I would suggest to stick to OEM valve seals.

Hi DaWan,

Top end is assembled so all supertech stuff is already in. Hope iīll not problem with that.
Anyway, my OEM oil pump is healthy (cheked with gauges). Oil out is ported and polished to help the flow and i increased pressure by putting a little washer with the relief valve spring.
I donīt know if i could port relief valve hole too, what do you think?

adryargument 03-17-2017 06:00 AM

Should of asked questions and did research before building the 1.6.
Instead of coming here half way through your build.

Then again hind sight is 20/20.

Either way you will enjoy the car. If not the 1.6 revs lololl

DaWaN 03-17-2017 07:21 AM


Originally Posted by Gn0m4 (Post 1399266)
Anyway, my OEM oil pump is healthy (cheked with gauges). Oil out is ported and polished to help the flow and i increased pressure by putting a little washer with the relief valve spring.
I donīt know if i could port relief valve hole too, what do you think?

Increasing the flow potential for the relief would not hurt. Looking from pictures I can find on the web you can see the relief flow of the later SVT pump is much bigger:
Old pump:
http://imageshack.com/a/img905/1307/mEGcAc.jpg
SVT pump:
http://imageshack.com/a/img910/8950/VH78lH.jpg
Now unfortunately I have never taken a BP pump apart myself yet (although I do have both a BP-4W and BP-Z3 in my garage both waiting for a rebuild and I will for sure check out the differences between the pumps).
So not sure where the bottleneck is with the factory relief flow, it could also be a dynamic thing. I think the shape of the vent holes determines the dynamic behavior and is also vastly different between the pumps. I am not a mechanical engineer with lots of hydrodynamic knowledge, so not exactly sure what is happening in these pumps and what exactly makes them break and whether you can fix it by porting. Shutting the factory relief valve and fitting an external relief valve has worked for others though. So fitting a boundary pump is not the only thing you can do to prevent the stock pump from breaking.

I think your old pump will do fine as long as you do not rev higher than stock redline.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands