Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats.

Miata Turbo Forum - Boost cars, acquire cats. (https://www.miataturbo.net/)
-   Engine Performance (https://www.miataturbo.net/engine-performance-56/)
-   -   Oil dipstick and tube (https://www.miataturbo.net/engine-performance-56/oil-dipstick-tube-54519/)

curly 12-25-2010 12:22 AM

I was going to say, you either found your oil problem or created one. You are having issues with oil blowing out, aren't you? That's what I remember.

hustler 12-25-2010 12:35 AM


Originally Posted by curly (Post 672814)
I was going to say, you either found your oil problem or created one. You are having issues with oil blowing out, aren't you? That's what I remember.

I did but it was a problem with the baffle on the passenger side. I killed that port and all is well.

mazda311 01-03-2011 11:57 PM

I wondered about this as well just did a 1.8 swap with mazdaspeed turbo parts. The top plastic part of the 1.8's dipstick was broken off, I must of been too cold to compare the two. But the tube fit with a little caressing. Did the mazdaspeed cars have a seperate part #?

hornetball 01-17-2014 07:49 PM

NECRO!!!!

But, I'm currently struggling with this so I'm going the post the data I've found so far for posterity.

In my case, I just bought a 1995. The oil dipstick handle was, of course, broken. But in fine TX style, the handle had been replaced with epoxy and a 9mm shell casing. I'm not into that, so I purchased the correct dipstick for a 1995 1.8 -- part number BPE8-10-450.

Now, the engine in this car had been rebuilt about 3K miles ago with the PO complaining of excessive oil consumption. The engine is a 1995 block (has oil ports on driver's side) with 1999 head and IM (VICS). I "ASSUMED" that the 1995 block retained its dipstick tube and dipstick. But when I match up the new dipstick to the old, the new one is longer. "F" on the new one lines up with "E" on the old one. If the tube is the 1995 version, that means the PO ran severely overfilled. Could this be the reason for the oil consumption?

These are the part numbers from the Mazda part books:

Oil Dipsticks:
90-93: B61P-10-450C (Tube is B61P-10-440) (DIP STICK (B61P-10-450C) - $10.92 - B61P10450C)
94-97: BPE8-10-450 (Tube is BPE8-10-440) (DIP STICK (BPE8-10-450) - $18.24 - BPE810450)
99-05: BP4W-10-450 (Tube is BP4W-10-440A) (DIP STICK (BP4W-10-450) - $19.99 - BP4W10450)

Oil Pans:
90-93 (1.6)
94-00 (1.8 w/o MBSP)
01-05 (1.8 w/ MBSP)

So . . . anyone know how to visually identify the difference between the 94-97 vs. 99-05 tubes?

Incidentally, the 94-97 dipstick ("BPE8" on handle) is nearly a perfect match to the 90-93 dipstick ("B61P" on handle) on my 90. You could safely swap those in a pinch.

rleete 01-18-2014 09:25 AM


Originally Posted by hornetball (Post 1093151)
Could this be the reason for the oil consumption?

Assuming that wasn't rhetorical, yes, it certainly is. You'll burn it off until it reaches about the correct level.


I know the newer dipsticks are longer; is it safe to assume the tubes are as well?

sixshooter 01-18-2014 10:23 AM

The one from my '96 is longer than the one reading BP4W. Therefore the one for the BP4W requires more oil in the pan to read full. Yes, the full mark of the longer one is even with the low mark of the other.

hornetball 01-18-2014 06:49 PM


Originally Posted by rleete (Post 1093254)
I know the newer dipsticks are longer; is it safe to assume the tubes are as well?

Like sixshooter said, other way around. The 1.6 and early-1.8 dipsticks are longer. Late 1.8 dipsticks are shorter.

Since the 1.8 used the same oil pan until the '01 MBSP pans, I'm almost sure that the late 1.8 disptick tubes would need to be shorter to match the dipstick. My wild guess is that this might have been an "attempt" to keep the handles from breaking so often.

Gryff 01-18-2014 11:04 PM

Just stumbled on this for the first time today... Im kind of concerned. I have a bp4w with an NA8 oil pan, and a NA6 dipstick tube and dipstick. Im not sure whether that would read high or low at this point...

Anyone have some insight? It always seemed to read high, but with the NA8 pan im not so sure what to think.

sixshooter 01-18-2014 11:38 PM

Put 4 quarts in an empty engine. Note level. Use that as your full level.

I usually put 5 quarts in mine for the track, but I'm not telling you to do it.

Gryff 01-19-2014 12:54 AM

Thats what I was going to do. Works out well since im changing oil tomorrow anyways.

hornetball 01-19-2014 08:31 PM

Gryff, I would expect the combination of parts you have to read just about perfectly. Sixshooter's 4 qt. test should confirm.

jacob300zx 01-20-2014 03:58 PM

Isn't it 4.5 quarts with a filter change?

EO2K 01-20-2014 04:51 PM

Fabulous, I just noticed last night the pan on the spare engine I picked is a BPE8 but it has the "California" braided wire dipstick. No clue on the tube, and its a mutt for parts :facepalm:

Any chance we can use this thread to start confirming and consolidating this info? Confirm the tube and stick PNs and measure the lengths? It would be nice to know what exactly is interchangeable.

hornetball 01-20-2014 06:41 PM


Originally Posted by jacob300zx (Post 1093773)
Isn't it 4.5 quarts with a filter change?

On my 1.6, it usually takes just shy of 4 quarts to get to full, including the filter change. Don't know about the 1.8. Works out pretty well, the gallon jug of Rotella usually gives me enough to keep proper levels until the next oil change.

sixshooter 01-20-2014 06:44 PM

1. Empty oil pan
2. Add 4 quarts (Preferably motor oil)
3. Mark level on dipstick
4. Stop whining (lol)

Savington 01-21-2014 03:42 PM

I drain and dump 4 quarts and monitor level from there.

I do actually have a bunch of dipsticks from various motors in the shop right now. I have a 1.6, a BP4W, and several BP6D sticks and tubes. Maybe if I'm feeling benevolent I'll measure a few of them this week.

thasac 01-21-2014 07:02 PM


Originally Posted by hornetball (Post 1093813)
On my 1.6, it usually takes just shy of 4 quarts to get to full, including the filter change. Don't know about the 1.8. Works out pretty well, the gallon jug of Rotella usually gives me enough to keep proper levels until the next oil change.

^ The Gallon/3.XX quart jug of Rotella T6 adequately fills both my 1.6 and 1.8. Sometimes I have top off the 1.8, but I believe that's due to a leaky cam cover seal and/or CAS seal.

Just order cases of the stuff when its on sale on Amazon (since I refuse to Walmart). The correct answer is Rotella T6.

-Zach

ridethecliche 06-14-2018 12:44 PM


Originally Posted by Savington (Post 1094149)
I drain and dump 4 quarts and monitor level from there.

I do actually have a bunch of dipsticks from various motors in the shop right now. I have a 1.6, a BP4W, and several BP6D sticks and tubes. Maybe if I'm feeling benevolent I'll measure a few of them this week.

Did you ever end up playing with your sticks and seeing how they fit in all the holes?

dglb99 06-14-2018 03:47 PM

When I got my 94 I put my dipstick from my 92 in it since that handle wasn't broken. From what I remember I compared them and they were the same. I never noticed anything out of the ordinary on the dipstick reading when I'd change the oil w/ filter and put in 4 qts.

StanTheMan 06-15-2018 07:36 AM

My NA6 dipstick is different to the BP4W dipstick.
If i'm ok with the NA6 dipstifck in the BP4W
I'm totally overfilled with the BP4W dipostick in the BP4W.

1.6 is definitely different to the 1.8
they both fasten at the same spot on the gearbox metal thingy
dipsticks are different lenths.
Full reference points are in different positions.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:27 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands