![]() |
I know some who really despise total seal rings...more than like it. I vote you talk to the machinist and find out.
|
Total Seal never went anywhere. But you'll see lots of opinions for and against them everywhere.
|
I know at least one person who despises the rings that came with the wiseco's--me. I have more blowby than I really should have. In reality, it's probably less the fault of the rings and more the fault of the machinist. Northwest Connecting Rod in Seattle FTL. :cry:
I wouldn't use the top rings. Just use the seconds, and find a machinist who's worked with them before. Cylinder wall finish is important with any rings, but some say it is particularly important with the TS rings. |
You are going to have more blowby with aftermarket pistons. You run bigger gaps. Who cares....just run more boost.
|
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 426336)
I've heard this as well, and I wonder if there is any actual documentation to back it up, or whether it is marketing hype? If true, then it is certain a strong argument in favor of the Supertechs.
OK, I'm bored, fuck it I'll check it out... According to Belfab they use 4032. According to Wiseco they use 2618. Looking up the CTEs for both materials, using the T6 condition: Aluminum 4032-T6 has a CTE of 10.8 µin/in-°F Aluminum 2618-T6 has a CTE of 12.4 µin/in-°F (properties taken from Matweb) Therefore, the Wiseco piston will expand about 23% more than the Belfab piston for a given temperature rise. CTE is a function of temperature, so I used the same temp range for both alloys. |
The less expansion, the longer the motor is going to last.
|
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 426719)
you need to tune your shit off boost.
|
Originally Posted by neogenesis2004
(Post 426820)
You are going to have more blowby with aftermarket pistons. You run bigger gaps. Who cares....just run more boost.
|
Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
(Post 426823)
Therefore, the Wiseco piston will expand about 23% more than the Belfab piston for a given temperature rise. CTE is a function of temperature, so I used the same temp range for both alloys.
Originally Posted by neogenesis2004
(Post 426820)
You are going to have more blowby with aftermarket pistons. You run bigger gaps. Who cares....just run more boost.
|
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 426936)
I don't have much of any...but my oil turns black fast. I need to do an UOA to see if its fuel contamination.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by y8s
(Post 426334)
I'd probably get the 85.5's for the 1.8...1951cc without a stroker! so what if the cylinder walls are foil thin? :)
Attachment 204924 |
Your cylinder walls are not what you need to be concerned with. The thickness of the remaining sleeves is. At the bore they are getting radically thin for boost.
|
Originally Posted by hustler
(Post 426936)
I've heard many suggest that after a few hundred heat cycles, they expand at the same rate. I went with a "loose" bore and I have no problems or excessive noise.
|
Originally Posted by neogenesis2004
(Post 426938)
You are now on to what I am refering to here. My point is that the additional blowby is not a big issue. The motor is going to be more loose than a stock motor. This is not a bad thing. Plus more frequent oil changes are to expected with a built motor.
|
Sorry to butt into the piston thread, but I also just bought MTuned rods and am looking at pistons. My machinist said he could get me JE Pistons 9.0:1 83.5mm for $510 including the pistons,wrist pins,and rings. This sounded like a pretty good price to me, but wondering what the consensus is on the JE vs. others being discussed in this thread? Thanks
|
I'm in the market for pistons as well. I vote we all decide on one brand of piston and try to get a group buy going from one of the sponsoring vendors or whoever can get a good deal.
|
Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
(Post 426823)
Just compare the thermal expansion coefficients (CTE) of the two alloys.
OK, I'm bored, fuck it I'll check it out... According to Belfab they use 4032. According to Wiseco they use 2618. Looking up the CTEs for both materials, using the T6 condition: Aluminum 4032-T6 has a CTE of 10.8 µin/in-°F Aluminum 2618-T6 has a CTE of 12.4 µin/in-°F (properties taken from Matweb) Therefore, the Wiseco piston will expand about 23% more than the Belfab piston for a given temperature rise. CTE is a function of temperature, so I used the same temp range for both alloys. |
Originally Posted by y8s
(Post 426334)
had I not picked my pistons up 2nd hand, I'd probably get the 85.5's for the 1.8...1951cc without a stroker! so what if the cylinder walls are foil thin? :) 1. I worry about thin cylinder walls at 400whp+ 2. The only HG available that will do a 2.5mm overbore is the Maruha copper gasket, at $160. Seeing as how I went through two OEMs before one sealed up, that would have cost me a fortune. |
Originally Posted by iWeasel410
(Post 429023)
You also need to look at fatigue life of 4032 vs 2618 at elevated temperatures...
Lots of ink has been used on discussions of aluminum piston material. Forged 2618 was used for piston material in Second World War aircraft engines. In certain piston engine applications, forged 4032 was preferred because of its lower coefficient of expansion. Alloy 2618 is often described as having higher strength than 4032, but at elevated temperatures (where pistons tend to operate), the strength distinction becomes quite small (Table 3). In fact, at 400°F, the 32 ksi YS of 4032 alloy is 18% higher than that of 2618 (27 ksi) at the same temperature. However, 2618 has an impressive resistance to weakening with prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures. 2618 is a copper-magnesium alloy with low silicon, but it expands with temperature about 15% faster than the high-silicon 4032 alloy. Currently, piston manufacturers seem to prefer the 2618 alloy, and many have done slight modifications either to the chemistry or to the tolerances to produce "proprietary" alloys. (source: EPI Inc. Advanced Engine Materials) Decisions, decisions... One would expect either piston to massively out-perform a stock unit under extreme abnormal aspiration. I tend to gravitate in the direction of the Supertechs on the basis of their lower thermal expansion and consequently tighter bore tolerance. |
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 429035)
Decisions, decisions...
One would expect either piston to massively out-perform a stock unit under extreme abnormal aspiration. I tend to gravitate in the direction of the Supertechs on the basis of their lower thermal expansion and consequently tighter bore tolerance. I had the benefit of using a builder who's done so many FI miatas that tolerance and bore decisions, which varied by piston material, were chosen from experience and not some general text-book rule. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:13 AM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands