Engine Performance This section is for discussion on all engine building related questions.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: KPower

Skunk2 BP intake manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-07-2017, 03:28 PM
  #101  
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
emilio700's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,325
Total Cats: 2,377
Default

On dyno today with Taxi. Preliminary results are that the spacers made no difference on this high hp N/A build. Made 182whp regardless of no, one or two spacers. Minor fluctuations in midrange power were just noise. Nothing repeatable. We did notice that the first pull after swapping parts with everything cold would give us a nice Dyno Queen number 3-5whp higher.

Stopping for lunch then we'll put the squaretop on. Plots will be posted tomorrow probably.
__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR
emilio700 is offline  
Leave a poscat 12 Leave a negcat
Old 11-07-2017, 04:34 PM
  #102  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

18psi is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-07-2017, 08:19 PM
  #103  
Newb
 
ScratchNSniff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 13
Total Cats: 1
Default

Looking good so far!!! Good info for sure!!!
ScratchNSniff is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-07-2017, 09:43 PM
  #104  
Supporting Vendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
emilio700's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7,325
Total Cats: 2,377
Default Built N/A manifold test results

A few more hp between 7000-8000 just like the stock engine. The difference was the S2 lost a bunch of midrange in the process. That surprised us.
The plot line you see above the rest in the midrange is the square top. We repeated it a few times heat soaked and it stayed within 2whp. Of note was the way the S2 died at 7700. We had the fuel cut set at 8100 for the S2. The square top kept pulling past where the S2 nosed over so we bumped the limiter to 8300. This again, surprised us. While the S2 clearly flows more at peak, it does so only in a narrow rpm band then chokes. Perhaps that is the result of careful 2nd order resonance optimization but lower average velocity? That's the same type of thing with intake ports with big CFM numbers but low velocity. One big dyno peak but nothing before or after.

We saw the S2 gain about 6whp for an 800rpm window up high but lost the same 6whp over 1400rpm in the midrange. For a 6 spd car, it could be personal preference either way. For a 5 spd car with the wider ratios, the square top would be faster.
No gains form the spacers. We're putting the square top back on for Super Lap this week. So N/A at least, we're not seeing much to get excited about. How about those used square top price fluctuations?

It will be a few weeks before we get it on Bullet with the TSE EFR6258 kit. Based on these results though, I'm not expecting any gains there either.


__________________


www.facebook.com/SuperMiata

949RACING.COM Home of the 6UL wheel

.31 SNR
emilio700 is offline  
Leave a poscat 11 Leave a negcat
Old 11-07-2017, 09:58 PM
  #105  
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
ysleem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Mount Pleasant, SC
Posts: 567
Total Cats: 7
Default

Wow! Betcha sales won't continue on those skunk2s...thanks for all that Emilio!
ysleem is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-07-2017, 10:46 PM
  #106  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

They will. But now when some n00b starts spamming every other thread with "you should get the s2, you'll pick up power" I'll have more basis of slapping them.

I've nothing against the s2 at all, I'm glad it was made, but unless it's drastically different on a boosted car vs n/a, we now know why s2 didn't post any plots.

Last edited by 18psi; 11-07-2017 at 11:23 PM.
18psi is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-07-2017, 11:12 PM
  #107  
Junior Member
 
ManiacLachy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 126
Total Cats: 38
Default

Emilio and crew have proven the S2 matches the Flattop, right. So this is just an alternative (not an improvement), one that's available to purchase NIB from vendors. Still delivers the same gains over USDM manifolds, and probably a decent pick up for people with the cash to burn. If it's worth getting a flattop, it's worth considering the S2.

I'll be sticking to stock for sometime yet myself.
ManiacLachy is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017, 01:14 AM
  #108  
Junior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Goingnowherefast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 397
Total Cats: 36
Default

Originally Posted by ysleem
Wow! Betcha sales won't continue on those skunk2s...thanks for all that Emilio!
Betcha they will.

Emilio proved (thank you so much btw), that the S2 holds up well to the Square top manifold as far as power numbers go. Bit lost in midrange for a bit gained in top-end. Given that the S2 weighs less, can be purchased brand new (not used off a 10 year old car with 100,000 miles from some guy on ebay named Steve), I say there's definitely still a place for them here. Also from personal experience, those doing VVT swaps will benefit greatly from the S2 manifold as they do not have to do any bending of fuel lines or shaving of the intake manifold to run the fuel lines. In addition, they grant much more room in to access fuel injectors and wiring.
Goingnowherefast is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017, 01:29 AM
  #109  
Elite Member
 
nitrodann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 2,826
Total Cats: 67
Default

I agree, those are all great points.

Dann
nitrodann is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017, 01:53 AM
  #110  
All-round "Good Guy"
 
Lokiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 993
Total Cats: 245
Default

... you also get a decent place to source your boost pressure from at the rear of the manifold - the square/flat-top requires tapping the rear of the manifold or sharing the brake booster barb).
Lokiel is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017, 09:32 AM
  #111  
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
SamS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,269
Total Cats: 7
Default

I'd definitely consider it if it makes changing injectors easier. Man that was probably one of the hardest parts of my turbo install and I'm not looking forward to changing them every time I have to get emissions tested. Speaking of emissions, does eliminating the VTCS butterflies trigger a CEL on the stock ECU?
SamS is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017, 10:23 AM
  #112  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
psyber_0ptix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,648
Total Cats: 544
Default

It would be cool not to have to split the square top to access the injectors. But I'm still not turned on by how difficult it seems to be to install an s2. Either way, less what-if's and conjecture. I'll wait for boosted results.
psyber_0ptix is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017, 11:40 AM
  #113  
Elite Member
iTrader: (4)
 
hornetball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Granbury, TX
Posts: 6,301
Total Cats: 696
Default

Originally Posted by emilio700
How about those used square top price fluctuations?
LOL. "Blue Horseshoe loves Anacott Steel." -Wall Street

Last edited by hornetball; 11-08-2017 at 05:13 PM.
hornetball is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017, 01:05 PM
  #114  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

it's a buyers market
the bubble has burst
18psi is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017, 01:23 PM
  #115  
Elite Member
iTrader: (16)
 
99mx5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 1,647
Total Cats: 524
Default

Thanks for posting this Emilio. Real data and not conjecture is what makes this forum. Props!
99mx5 is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017, 01:48 PM
  #116  
Senior Member
 
andyfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Louisville,KY
Posts: 1,129
Total Cats: 97
Default

Surprising results, curious about it on a turbo car still however. Squaretop for the win so far it seems.
andyfloyd is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017, 04:52 PM
  #117  
Elite Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Mobius's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,468
Total Cats: 365
Default

Originally Posted by Goingnowherefast
Betcha they will.

Given that the S2 weighs less, can be purchased brand new (not used off a 10 year old car with 100,000 miles from some guy on ebay named Steve), I say there's definitely still a place for them here.
Yes, you can buy it new as opposed to a used Squaretop from a guy named Steve. The thing is ... there's literally nothing to fail on a squaretop intake manifold. There are no moving parts. At most you might need to have it washed in a parts cleaner, unless the thing has been physically damaged in some way. So, as far as used parts go, a squaretop purchase is about as low-risk as they get. And, the squaretop actually fits correctly without modification, which is somewhat inexcusable for Skunk2 to have done.

Originally Posted by SamS
I'd definitely consider it if it makes changing injectors easier. Man that was probably one of the hardest parts of my turbo install and I'm not looking forward to changing them every time I have to get emissions tested. Speaking of emissions, does eliminating the VTCS butterflies trigger a CEL on the stock ECU?
Yes, that is my understanding, that it throws a code. Perhaps @curly can chime in, I discussed this briefly with him at one point. @SamS if you need to meet obd2 emissions, you could consider using an Xede piggyback with the stock ecu. I happen to have one I could sell you. Easier (still a PITA, but easier) and less messy than swapping injectors.

Thanks Emilio for sharing this data with the community.
Mobius is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017, 05:02 PM
  #118  
Junior Member
 
Steve Dallas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Republic of Texas
Posts: 421
Total Cats: 70
Default

I will have you all know that buying a square top off eBay from a guy named Steve is perfectly safe, and is a desirable thing to do. Furthermore, Steve is both an Analyist and a Therapist, also known as an Analrapist, so you would be in very good hands.
Steve Dallas is offline  
Leave a poscat 6 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017, 05:03 PM
  #119  
VladiTuned
iTrader: (76)
 
18psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 35,821
Total Cats: 3,481
Default

And if you need further proof, you can check out his build thread on this very forum.

Does his license plate say "anustart"?

Last edited by 18psi; 11-08-2017 at 05:27 PM.
18psi is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat
Old 11-08-2017, 05:24 PM
  #120  
All-round "Good Guy"
 
Lokiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 993
Total Cats: 245
Default

Originally Posted by SamS
I'd definitely consider it if it makes changing injectors easier. Man that was probably one of the hardest parts of my turbo install and I'm not looking forward to changing them every time I have to get emissions tested. Speaking of emissions, does eliminating the VTCS butterflies trigger a CEL on the stock ECU?
You'll need to swap back the OEM intake manifold for the emissions testing too and re-install all the plumbing since VTCS-related CEL errors wont be the only CEL errors you'll get with the Skunk2 manifold (eg. emissions control errors).

If you think unbolting the top half of the OEM intake manifold to access your injectors is a hassle, you're in for a real world of pain swapping the lower half of the intake manifold.
Lokiel is offline  
Leave a poscat 0 Leave a negcat



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:24 AM.