I wonder how much more it would have put down if it had spark plugs :party:
|
Wire tuck bro.
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1302659)
I wonder how much more it would have put down if it had spark plugs :party:
|
I hope those afr's aren't 12.5-13 like the graph shows
|
Originally Posted by mmmjesse
(Post 1302661)
While it could have given more power, we opted for the weight reduction and improved chassis balance that omitting the spark plugs allowed.
--Ian |
I put about 30k miles on a stock '95 pistons with eagle rods daily driven at 332whp. Currently around 370whp on stock '99 pistons, but they haven't been in there long enough to claim any kind of longevity. I think the pistons will handle than people give them credit for.
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1302662)
I hope those afr's aren't 12.5-13 like the graph shows
|
Originally Posted by Girz0r
(Post 1302696)
Isn't 11.8 more suitable?
|
Originally Posted by aidandj
(Post 1302533)
Revs faster means better spool
|
knife edge a 1.6 crank.
|
touche
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands