Virgin Head...Friday night engine porn NSFW :)
10 Attachment(s)
I came home tonight to find this box on my doorstep. It contains what is supposed to be one of the two final 1999-2000 virgin heads that came from the Mazda Japan warehouse. After this, no new production, no NOS unless you can find it collecting dust on a dealer's shelf.
Who's got the other last head? This guy. :) |
That's beautiful.
Now hack it up :giggle: |
Needs to get dirty, or put in glass on the wall
|
|
Since they're the last heads from Japan, I feel it's my duty to get as much friggin' horsepower out of them as possible, while still being street-able of course. We're nearing the end of any type of "new" development of the Miata mill, so it's incumbent on me to use the knowledge of those who have come before to tune the shit outta these heads.
There's a road map planned to take me to 180whp NA, and beyond. :) |
Guess why?
|
Cause I have 3 of these in my garage...that's why.
|
Originally Posted by thirdgen
(Post 1039726)
Cause I have 3 of these in my garage...that's why.
|
They say whore-ders have mental issues...I say that might be true.
|
That's an MSM head, not a 99-00 head. Just FYI.
Why aren't you using a VVT head? |
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1039805)
That's an MSM head, not a 99-00 head. Just FYI.
Why aren't you using a VVT head?
Originally Posted by cordycord
(Post 1039705)
one of the two final 1999-2000 virgin heads that came from the Mazda Japan warehouse.
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1039805)
That's an MSM head, not a 99-00 head. Just FYI.
Why aren't you using a VVT head? As for no VVT, mainly to keep it simple. This is an old skool engine and I'm treating it that way. |
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1039805)
That's an MSM head, not a 99-00 head. Just FYI.
|
It will cost you a 150% more for only 10% performance increase.
|
Originally Posted by k24madness
(Post 1040110)
How do you tell em apart?
|
Originally Posted by Oscar
(Post 1040118)
It will cost you a 150% more for only 10% performance increase.
|
nothing wrong with you preferring to molest virgin heads
they're so much tighter :party: |
Originally Posted by cordycord
(Post 1040312)
Have you not seen my other projects?! No one has ever accused me of my Spock-like logic. |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 1040315)
nothing wrong with you preferring to molest virgin heads
they're so much tighter :party: |
4 Attachment(s)
I got one of these a few months ago too. I thought they were unavailable, but have a good connection in the dealership circle.
I think it was around $1000 bare though. |
Originally Posted by slmhofy
(Post 1040472)
I got one of these a few months ago too. I thought they were unavailable, but have a good connection in the dealership circle.
I think it was around $1000 bare though. By "nothing fancy" I still mean 180-200whp on pump gas, NA. |
Originally Posted by cordycord
(Post 1040942)
By "nothing fancy" I still mean 180-200whp on pump gas, NA.
|
After reading Quinn's build over on cr.net, its had me thinking about building the BP4W head I have sitting on the shelf and skipping VVT, but I'd hate to give up the low/mid range torque.
|
Originally Posted by z31maniac
(Post 1041028)
*impatiently waits for build thread*
|
Originally Posted by Midtenn
(Post 1041182)
After reading Quinn's build over on cr.net, its had me thinking about building the BP4W head I have sitting on the shelf and skipping VVT, but I'd hate to give up the low/mid range torque.
|
Originally Posted by cordycord
(Post 1041312)
I like Emilio's method of building, confirming and then telling. My bench-racing skills are legendary for their inflation factor. :)
|
Originally Posted by cordycord
(Post 1041314)
I've heard that as an excuse for not installing a larger turbo (don't want the lag of a bigger unit) except that on the track or during spirited driving yours rpm's will already have negated that point. BTW, I'm not advocating a position but just making an observation. |
Originally Posted by cordycord
(Post 1041314)
on the track or during spirited driving yours rpm's will already have negated that point. BTW, I'm not advocating a position but just making an observation.
|
Originally Posted by Savington
(Post 1042250)
Ah, no. The idea that VVT engines only make additional torque below the lowest RPM seen on track is quite fallacious. Especially with a 5-speed, ~4500rpm is not an unreasonable minimum RPM to expect on a road course. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands