2 Attachment(s)
Threads like this are convincing me that overall stress killed my stock rod as well. No one could figure out a definite cause and just trying to start the car one day caused it to bend enough to contact the cylinder wall. It bent on both planes.
Attachment 202995 Attachment 202996 |
What confuses the hell out of me is that there are all these people with bent rods, and yet there are 10 times more people running the same kind of power/boost on stock rods for 10's of thousands of miles with no problems.
Did mazda pick-n-choose which cars got shitty rods and which ones got good ones or what? LOL |
This reminds me of something I read somewhere about R package and SE vehicles got the engines that Mazda deemed the best. I guess the ones that made the most power or were balanced the closest. Is this true? Forget where I saw this.
|
I do not believe that. But if someone shows any proof I'll be happy to retract my statement.
|
I thought our motors were pretty bad ass, and that the 4g63 was shit. I guess Im wrong :dunno:
|
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 473112)
I do not believe that. But if someone shows any proof I'll be happy to retract my statement.
|
Originally Posted by NA6C-Guy
(Post 473110)
This reminds me of something I read somewhere about R package and SE vehicles got the engines that Mazda deemed the best. I guess the ones that made the most power or were balanced the closest.
|
You guys are going to get everyone all paranoid. After 10 months of my noob ass trying to figure out how to tune my rods looked perfect. Turn up the boost!
|
Originally Posted by Joe Perez
(Post 473122)
In order for that to be the case, Mazda would have to run every single engine on a dyno. Lamborghini can afford this luxury. Pretty sure that the first time a BP / B8 gets fired up is after it's had a car installed on it.
|
Fuck it, our motors are cheap. More boost ftw.
|
Originally Posted by kotomile
(Post 473052)
Nice article, very interesting read. Thanks for the link. |
Originally Posted by 18psi
(Post 473109)
What confuses the hell out of me is that there are all these people with bent rods, and yet there are 10 times more people running the same kind of power/boost on stock rods for 10's of thousands of miles with no problems.
Did mazda pick-n-choose which cars got shitty rods and which ones got good ones or what? LOL and part of the "pick n choose" is the higher compression cars. What bugs me now is that I'm probably driving my own car around with rods that look like that. eek. |
As long as they don't bend too much or break I guess the car would be acting normal though, right?
I've been arguing with my dad about this whole "bent rods" issue. He REFUSES TO BELIEVE that you could bend a rod and the engine would still be driving and not knocking or blowing up. This is really helping my argument. |
For all four to bend like that and not break you'd have to be right at the threshold of what those rods can take...AND not see any detonation. Since detonation usual finds the weak link (weakest rod of set) and causes catastrophic failure, and det is often more prevalent in one cylinder more than others.
It appears that the motor saw just a little too much power, the rods bent and work hardened...becoming "stronger" (although more brittle) and the motor was happy...if not running as designed for a while. Kind of a steady state failure that allowed the motor to keep running. If anything this points strongly towards EXCELLENT engine management and det prevention...and suggests a real upper limit on torque capacity for stock rods. y8s: Did either of previous owners ever dyno it? Any idea on peak torque? |
Originally Posted by ZX-Tex
(Post 473157)
http://image.turbomagazine.com/f/854...car+piston.jpg
Nice article, very interesting read. Thanks for the link. |
But if you notice all the people with stock motors and lots of boost are the 1.6 evey time you hear of someone bending a rod it's in a 1.8 or at least the majority
|
Originally Posted by Robbi Laurenson @ m.net
I must be around 225 rwhp at 9 psi, and probably 240+ at 10 psi. That's on an FMII BBB, turbo midpipe and single exhaust with the MoTeC M4 running full sequential, tuned on a WB02 to 0.85 lambda. Timing is FM map from Ken for an '01.
This is probably a low estimate since others are making better power with the same gear. I am adjusting for no dyno tuning. So far no knock registered on the J&S with water injection. Still going after 12k boosted. |
Originally Posted by y8s
(Post 473170)
What bugs me now is that I'm probably driving my own car around with rods that look like that. eek.
|
yea this seems kinda crazy. m-tuned guy road around on 360whp for like 8 months no issues and this one bends up rods at 250? looks like im not putting a stock motor back in my car.
|
Originally Posted by 1slowna
(Post 473254)
yea this seems kinda crazy. m-tuned guy road around on 360whp for like 8 months no issues and this one bends up rods at 250? looks like im not putting a stock motor back in my car.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:07 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands