Computer Advice Needed
05-20-2013, 01:12 AM
#385
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Key West
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
None.
What I have: Intel DH67GB mobo, i5-2310 2.9GHz, 1tb hard drive, 16gb ram, LG optical drive and a cooler master exteme 600. That's what I remember, lol.
Does this have to do with my monitor, or is there a setting? Basically, I have no ******* clue.
I've never PC gamed before.
What I have: Intel DH67GB mobo, i5-2310 2.9GHz, 1tb hard drive, 16gb ram, LG optical drive and a cooler master exteme 600. That's what I remember, lol.
I've never PC gamed before.
Reply
0
0
05-20-2013, 03:16 AM
#386
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,022
Total Cats: 6,589
Oh, well, it's easy then.
Buy a Radeon HD7770. End of story. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814127664
Yup, that's all up to snuff.
Don't worry about it, this is too much detail.
The short answer is yes and yes, but it's no biggie.
Buy a Radeon HD7770. End of story. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814127664
What I have: Intel DH67GB mobo, i5-2310 2.9GHz, 1tb hard drive, 16gb ram,
Does this have to do with my monitor, or is there a setting? Basically, I have no ******* clue.
The short answer is yes and yes, but it's no biggie.
Reply
0
0
05-20-2013, 03:34 AM
#387
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Key West
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
Wow, that's pretty cheap. Thanks, Vasquez. Let's Rock!
Should I be concerned about core temps? After an hour of spirited Hawken play, my temps were up between 50-60c.
Should I be concerned about core temps? After an hour of spirited Hawken play, my temps were up between 50-60c.
Last edited by viperormiata; 05-20-2013 at 03:50 AM.
Reply
0
0
05-20-2013, 11:16 AM
#388
More noob questions.
Does running memory in dual-channel mode matter much? IE, is it worth the extra cost of getting 2 matching sticks (and pulling the existing 4 GB stick), or am I fine just getting another 4 GB stick of similar if not identical specs and letting the BIOS adjust to the slower stick?
Does running memory in dual-channel mode matter much? IE, is it worth the extra cost of getting 2 matching sticks (and pulling the existing 4 GB stick), or am I fine just getting another 4 GB stick of similar if not identical specs and letting the BIOS adjust to the slower stick?
Reply
0
0
05-20-2013, 12:03 PM
#389
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,022
Total Cats: 6,589
Yes, it is.
Now, this is not the absolute most powerful card on the market by any means. It was engineered to be inexpensive and have a low power signature. So if you're trying to play Call of Duty 27 across nine monitors with all of the quality settings on "Is this the Matrix, or is it real?" then you'll probably need something beefier.
But I got this as an upgrade to an old GTX280 for the purpose of playing TF2 on a single monitor at 1920x1200, and with most quality settings at maximum, it never drops below 60 FPS (I have Hsync turned on, so the card is inherently locked at 60 FPS. If I unselect it, then FPS increases to 100+, however this is unnecessary.)
I know nothing of Hawken. It looks a bit more visually complex than TF2, so other opinions might be warranted.
60° is nothing for a modern CPU / GPU. Hell, some of the AMD CPUs IDLE at close to that temp. (Another reason why AMD CPUs suck.)
Your CPU isn't going to burn itself out. Modern units will all downscale their clock if things start to get out of hand, but it doesn't sound like you're anywhere near the limit.
At the lab where I work, one of our bigger-brain EE types commonly jokes (with regard to some of the newer, larger BGA-style FPGAs) that until the solder starts melting out from under it, there's no problem.
Now, this is not the absolute most powerful card on the market by any means. It was engineered to be inexpensive and have a low power signature. So if you're trying to play Call of Duty 27 across nine monitors with all of the quality settings on "Is this the Matrix, or is it real?" then you'll probably need something beefier.
But I got this as an upgrade to an old GTX280 for the purpose of playing TF2 on a single monitor at 1920x1200, and with most quality settings at maximum, it never drops below 60 FPS (I have Hsync turned on, so the card is inherently locked at 60 FPS. If I unselect it, then FPS increases to 100+, however this is unnecessary.)
I know nothing of Hawken. It looks a bit more visually complex than TF2, so other opinions might be warranted.
Your CPU isn't going to burn itself out. Modern units will all downscale their clock if things start to get out of hand, but it doesn't sound like you're anywhere near the limit.
At the lab where I work, one of our bigger-brain EE types commonly jokes (with regard to some of the newer, larger BGA-style FPGAs) that until the solder starts melting out from under it, there's no problem.
Reply
0
0
05-23-2013, 01:31 PM
#390
Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Key West
Posts: 6,110
Total Cats: 283
Thanks a lot, Joe. I'll be looking to buy one as soon as I done buying car parts.
In the meantime, I have been playing around with things like Rainmeter. I have to admit, it's really fun. Here's a screen shot of my desktop.
In the meantime, I have been playing around with things like Rainmeter. I have to admit, it's really fun. Here's a screen shot of my desktop.
Reply
0
0
05-24-2013, 12:11 PM
#391
More noob questions.
Does running memory in dual-channel mode matter much? IE, is it worth the extra cost of getting 2 matching sticks (and pulling the existing 4 GB stick), or am I fine just getting another 4 GB stick of similar if not identical specs and letting the BIOS adjust to the slower stick?
Does running memory in dual-channel mode matter much? IE, is it worth the extra cost of getting 2 matching sticks (and pulling the existing 4 GB stick), or am I fine just getting another 4 GB stick of similar if not identical specs and letting the BIOS adjust to the slower stick?
Reply
0
0
05-24-2013, 12:24 PM
#392
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,022
Total Cats: 6,589
The real-world performance penalty from mismatched RAM is likely to be trivial as compared to the performance gains resulting from the increased RAM reducing the amount of swap activity.
The slowest solid-state RAM ever made is still many times faster than the fastest hard drive.
The slowest solid-state RAM ever made is still many times faster than the fastest hard drive.
Reply
0
0
05-24-2013, 12:35 PM
#393
The real-world performance penalty from mismatched RAM is likely to be trivial as compared to the performance gains resulting from the increased RAM reducing the amount of swap activity.
The slowest solid-state RAM ever made is still many times faster than the fastest hard drive.
The slowest solid-state RAM ever made is still many times faster than the fastest hard drive.
That said, I can't help but think that rather than spending a little on a video card or extra RAM, I might be better off getting an SSD first and doing a clean OS install on that. Would cost a bit more, but then I wouldn't have to redo the OS later on down the road.
Reply
0
0
05-24-2013, 01:06 PM
#394
Mgeoffriau what is your most immediate goal with this computer? I'd definately go gpu if you're wanting a better gaming experience. If/when you go ssd, I highly reccommend using it for your OS but keep using the other hdd for storage. I've done that and man is it nice. I had to reload windows one evening, took about an hour on the ssd, and after that I was immediately back up and running since I lost no data.
Reply
0
0
05-24-2013, 01:31 PM
#395
Mgeoffriau what is your most immediate goal with this computer? I'd definately go gpu if you're wanting a better gaming experience. If/when you go ssd, I highly reccommend using it for your OS but keep using the other hdd for storage. I've done that and man is it nice. I had to reload windows one evening, took about an hour on the ssd, and after that I was immediately back up and running since I lost no data.
SSD and RAM are probably more important. I'm just thinking SSD now so that I can avoid redoing the OS later on.
Reply
0
0
05-24-2013, 02:16 PM
#397
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,022
Total Cats: 6,589
I'm just thinking SSD now so that I can avoid redoing the OS later on.
On the other hand, this is another area in which bumping the RAM first will have a huge performance advantage- even with TRIM, the sort of constant write/read/erase behavior which is associated with the heavy use of paging / virtual memory is hugely detrimental to the performance of an SSD.
Reply
0
0
05-24-2013, 03:07 PM
#399
Boost Pope
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago. (The less-murder part.)
Posts: 33,022
Total Cats: 6,589
I speak the truth.
If you are only running 4GB of RAM, then I guarantee you that your system is spending quite a lot of time paging in and out of virtual memory. And even while the write performance of newer MLC drives is getting pretty good, it's still many orders of magnitude slower than the write performance of DRAM.
Eliminating the need for paging will speed up the system quite a great deal more than marginally improving the speed of the device being paged to.
Reply
0
0
