General Miata Chat A place to talk about anything Miata

remote turbos. ha

Old 03-07-2007, 11:40 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
savior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 215
Total Cats: 0
Default remote turbos. ha

what is everyone's opinion on remote turbos. They remind me of those "electric superchargers" but they seem to work fairly well (not great, but not terrible either).
savior is offline  
Old 03-07-2007, 11:50 PM
  #2  
Elite Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Trent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,651
Total Cats: 39
Default

are you talking about the STS systems? On v8's they seem to work well. I'm leery of the oil lines and having the turbos more susceptible to environmental damage (think road salt), but if you have a super crowded engine bay, hey, it's a solution.
Trent is offline  
Old 03-07-2007, 11:51 PM
  #3  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
cjernigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
Default

There was a big talk about this on .net i think. They would be good for a vehicle that didnt' have the engine bay space, but otherwise I don't see the benefits or reason for doing it.
cjernigan is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 12:11 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
boostinsteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 563
Total Cats: 0
Default

My LT1 camaro has nor room under the hood at all. Just an example of when the sts remote mount system works really well. On a miata with the room that is avaible, I would just mont under the hood.
boostinsteve is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 12:19 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Fritch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Holiday, FL
Posts: 563
Total Cats: 0
Default

if I had a cheap beater miata and nothing else to do... I'd do it in a heartbeat, just to say I've done it.

Hell it can't be that bad at all, people WAY over-exaggerate what they don't already know about these setups.
Fritch is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 12:47 AM
  #6  
Elite Member
iTrader: (13)
 
cjernigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 8,091
Total Cats: 7
Default

It would be cool I suppose. Could make for a super clean engine bay, I like the look of the big snail under my hood.
cjernigan is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 01:03 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
 
ApexOnYou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South Eastern Wisconsin
Posts: 1,274
Total Cats: 0
Default

It would make a killer sleeper, but I just couldn't live with the turbo being under the car. I bottom out alot..
ApexOnYou is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 07:59 AM
  #8  
Tour de Franzia
iTrader: (6)
 
hustler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Republic of Dallas
Posts: 29,085
Total Cats: 375
Default

it works on v8's, but I believe people bitch about 500rpm-later spool in hondas.
hustler is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 08:03 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
UofACATS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tucson "it's 110º" Arizona
Posts: 1,017
Total Cats: 0
Default

The V-8 setups are sick. And it's a great idea if they wouldn't fit otherwise. Wonder what the spool sounds like?
UofACATS is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 08:35 AM
  #10  
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
magnamx-5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: nowhere
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
Default

that one guy kurt rohmer is doing one i think
magnamx-5 is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 08:43 AM
  #11  
Boost Czar
iTrader: (62)
 
Braineack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Posts: 79,484
Total Cats: 4,076
Default

it would work, but it's easier to build a normal system. besides who really want to have the oil lines so low and have to use a scavenger pump for the return.
Braineack is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 08:47 AM
  #12  
:(
iTrader: (7)
 
magnamx-5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: nowhere
Posts: 8,255
Total Cats: 4
Default

not me that is my main reason for not doing it.
magnamx-5 is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 12:29 PM
  #13  
mxv
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
mxv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 582
Total Cats: 0
Default

the heat retention in the turbo manifold/exhaust would have to be amazing to spool any decent size turbo i would think after seeing a few they deffinetly do work but i still wonder exactly how. they seem like every single thing you try to keep from when designing a turbo setup they have done. i understand trying to stay out the bay but damn.
mxv is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 12:37 PM
  #14  
Elite Member
iTrader: (24)
 
kotomile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Monterey, CA
Posts: 7,537
Total Cats: 42
Default

I'm with him^. Spool would SUCK. All that volume...
kotomile is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 12:45 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
RicanmiataRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,167
Total Cats: -1
Default

I actually started a discussion on m.net about this a while back....lol pretty intreasting responses from the m folk , seems like just a waste of time and effort from a performance standard on a miata.
RicanmiataRacer is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 01:10 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Al Hounos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Knoxville
Posts: 1,168
Total Cats: 0
Default

They seem like such a compromised version of a turbo that I'd rather just go with nitrous, if I had a V8 car with limited space.
Al Hounos is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 01:29 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
getsidewaysd1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NAS Oceana/VA
Posts: 759
Total Cats: 0
Default

I think there stupid.
getsidewaysd1 is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 01:58 PM
  #18  
Elite Member
iTrader: (9)
 
TurboTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chesterfield, NJ
Posts: 6,891
Total Cats: 398
Default

I think they're smart.
TurboTim is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 03:04 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
VRTSid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 531
Total Cats: 0
Default

I think they are made of magic.

well actually I think they work so well on v8's because of the volume of air they can move through the exhaust. small i4 seems a little weezy for that much air to move, but I guess kurt will be the proof. either its very similar to a standard install/better, or its not and worse
VRTSid is offline  
Old 03-08-2007, 07:12 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Fritch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Holiday, FL
Posts: 563
Total Cats: 0
Default

Originally Posted by kotomile
I'm with him^. Spool would SUCK. All that volume...


all that volume huh? yeah there wouldn't really be any more piping than with traditional IC routing. And honestly, there isn't that much volume when you consider how fast the turbo is pumping and how much the engine can flow/consume

Its way over exaggerated.
Fritch is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: remote turbos. ha



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:03 PM.