What would you do? EMS
I've listened to everyones advice about rebuilding my 1.6 or swapping to a 1.8. I'm going to go with the advice to swap in a 99 engine.
I have a working LINK. Would you stay with the LINK after the upgrade or switch to a modern EMS (adaptronic, AEM, or MSPNP)? Why? |
I didn't like the non-realtime tuning of the Link. Plus all the extra features of the newer EMS' is a nice thing to have.
|
Would you expound on the "new features"? I only have experience with the link. I'm aware that better resolution will allow more fluid control of timing and fuel. Real time tuning would be nice. I've worked without real time tuning, so it's not that difficult, just more time consuming. What makes the change worth 1k - 2k. That's the real question.
|
If your link is running good and you like it, dont bother.
Part of all those eMS things are about keeping up with being cool too. If something works good and you are happy about it, why change it? It's no like you will make bogs of money by selling the Link either. |
Originally Posted by Skittles
(Post 428071)
If your link is running good and you like it, dont bother.
Part of all those eMS things are about keeping up with being cool too. If something works good and you are happy about it, why change it? It's no like you will make bogs of money by selling the Link either. |
Originally Posted by djp0623
(Post 428054)
Would you expound on the "new features"? I only have experience with the link. I'm aware that better resolution will allow more fluid control of timing and fuel. Real time tuning would be nice. I've worked without real time tuning, so it's not that difficult, just more time consuming. What makes the change worth 1k - 2k. That's the real question.
Did my car start up and drive with the Link? Yep. |
If you don't know why you need new engine management, then you don't need it.
Given your current setup, I don't think it's worth the cost. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:29 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands